Ummmmm.... yeah. Oops! Sorry about that!2m in your equations isn't mass?

In any event there nothing special about the mass. The derivation of the equations is perfectly general and has nothing to do with holographic mass.

-Dan

- Thread starter new-branch
- Start date

Ummmmm.... yeah. Oops! Sorry about that!2m in your equations isn't mass?

In any event there nothing special about the mass. The derivation of the equations is perfectly general and has nothing to do with holographic mass.

-Dan

What is a "decohered condensed wave packet?" Are you still trying to talk about entanglement? No, the process of any action at a distance will not be a wave behavior. But your question about the tunneling does not involve entanglement. Coherent waves, as I mentioned, will act like a single wave.Do we have proof decohered condenced wave packets are still waves?

Does a matter wave travel like a corkscrew? File:Zirkularpolarisation.gif - Wikimedia Commons

I'm not going to join them to download the paper. In the abscense of any forces matter waves travel just like any other transverse wave.

Like I said, get off the internet and read a textbook.

-Dan

Look, I screwed up on the mass part of the problem but there are no forces involved in tunneling! Will you get off of it?It does in that forces are not acting on holographic mass

You keep talking about topics that are over your head. Learn the basics, then come back.

-Dan

Right, no forces involved unless the particle is physical and prevents it from tunneling.

Duality at all stages of a particle's life is a misconception.

It is either a particle Or a wave, not both at the same time. The quantum field does still have the power to make it ageless and wobble when a particle. Duality is dead.

or is duality a Density Matrix? (mixed states)

Put the random videos away.

Force yourself to rigorously go through a series of lectures such as

Find and force yourself to solve associated problem sets so that you develop the mathematical tools necessary to do further work.

Only after you have absorbed the basic framework of QM and have the math skills to back it up should you come on here and declare you've got new paradigms that will upend everything.

Maybe you do! Maybe somehow you were genetically developed with an innate feel for quantum field theory and all your assertions are correct and us infantile humans here at mymathforum just aren't able to comprehend your new physics. Well if you ever want to prove this to anyone's satisfaction you're going to need to demonstrate a mastery of most all that has gone before.

Unless you are able to directly apply your results to engineering and give us all fusion in a keychain and antigrav shoes, that's just how it works.

The math is in this https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-6596/67/1/012041/pdf

Similar Math Discussions | Math Forum | Date |
---|---|---|

Show M not diagonalizable | Linear Algebra | |

I can't show why x->0 of sin(x)/x is 1!!! | Calculus | |

Show these point form a square | Geometry | |

Show that a triangle is right angled | Geometry |