Contractible & Deformation Retracts to a point....

Math help on sequences, numerical series, computation of limits, Cauchy sequences, the Real Numbers properties, the Least Upper Bound axiom, Dedekind cuts, completion, convergence and divergence of integrals, multiple integrals, Riemann Integrals, Measure Theory, Lebesgue integrals, Fourier Analysis, Harmonic Analysis, Open sets, Closed sets; Quasicompact, Compact, Paracompact, Connected, path-connected, Hausdorff, Regular, Normal, Baire, Polish spaces; limits, continuity, connectedness, continuous maps, open maps, continuum, homotopy theory, homology theory, torus, spheres on My Math Forum.
Math problems in Real Analysis Integration Functional Analysis Topology Differential Calculus

Contractible & Deformation Retracts to a point....

Postby TTB3 » Sun Feb 07, 2010 3:46 am

Hi all,

I'm just going through Hatcher, in which he stresses there is a difference between a space being contractible & it deformation retracting to a point - but I cannot figure out what the difference is! :?

I realise that he gives an example of when they are different at the end of chapter 0, but I cant work out why we have a difference by just looking at the definitions.

Near the bottom of page 3, he says that a deformation retraction is "a homotopy from the identity map of X to a retraction from X onto a subspace A". In his second sentance of page 4 he says that a contractible space is one where "the identity map is homotopy to the constant map".

But surely the constant map is a retraction, and so therefore such a homotopy is always a deformation retraction. So then ANY contractible space would also deformation retract onto a point. :?

It seems to me that these 2 definitions are basically equivalent.

But am I wrong?

Please don't give me a counterexample - instead explain to me why these 2 definitions [contractible and deformation retracts to a point] are different.

Thank you x :)
TTB3
King of Diamonds
King of Diamonds
 
Posts: 78
Joined: Tue Dec 09, 2008 3:48 am

Re: Contractible & Deformation Retracts to a point....

Postby pseudonym » Sun Feb 07, 2010 8:23 am

It's been a while since I did this stuff so I may be off, but I believe being deformation retractible to a point is a stronger property than being contractible. A space is contractible when the identity map is homotopy equivalent to some constant map, however, that constant map may not be a retraction. I suppose a constant map may fail to be a retraction by not having a fix point. My guess is the example in Hatcher illustrates this.
pseudonym
King of Diamonds
King of Diamonds
 
Posts: 197
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 3:54 pm


Return to Real Analysis & Topology

Who is online

Registered users: Baidu [Spider], CRGreathouse, Google [Bot], Yahoo [Bot]