
Topology Topology Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 28th, 2015, 10:04 AM  #11  
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  Quote:
You could look at the curvature of each circle, for example, and find that it is 1 for the first, 1/2 for the second, 1/3 for the third, and so on. You could then note that the curvature of the sequence tends toward a limit, which is 0. This is what is means (formally) when a person says that as the radius increases without bound ("tends to $\infty$") that the curvature tends to 0. What claim are you making about this sequence of circles? If you're defining a function f(C) is 1 if C is a curve and 0 otherwise, then f of the first circle is 1, f of the second circle is 1, and so on; the limit is, of course, 1.  
May 28th, 2015, 12:15 PM  #12 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2014 From: Brazil Posts: 203 Thanks: 1 
I say what the function when radius tends to ∞, not be defined in this point, that's all. Lucio 
May 28th, 2015, 01:09 PM  #13 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
It doesn't have to be defined at the limit point for the limit to exist.

May 28th, 2015, 01:26 PM  #14 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2014 From: Brazil Posts: 203 Thanks: 1 
Forgiveme the error , I would to say the function not be defined when the radius tends to infinite, I wanna say it's limit doesn't exists what this occurs. What I say about the point, do not exist such thing like infinite point. Lucio Last edited by lemgruber; May 28th, 2015 at 01:28 PM. 
May 28th, 2015, 02:13 PM  #15 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
Well clearly the function is well defined for all finite radius. And in these cases the curvature is nonzero (positive, in fact). In the limit the curvature is zero, but the function is clearly 1. It doesn't work to claim that the limit doesn't exist just because it doesn't say what you want it to say. 
May 28th, 2015, 02:20 PM  #16 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2014 From: Brazil Posts: 203 Thanks: 1 
I agree. Lucio 

Tags 
circumference, depends, euclides, infinite, postulates 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
postulates/theorems  Chanoch  Geometry  2  April 29th, 2014 11:18 AM 
Geometry postulates: confusion.  rabbit  Geometry  1  February 17th, 2012 10:06 PM 
Probability of B if it depends on A happening or not  peaceofmind  Probability and Statistics  9  June 4th, 2011 06:40 PM 
Postulates behind algebra?  epson1  Algebra  13  February 21st, 2011 10:46 AM 