My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Topology

Topology Topology Math Forum


Thanks Tree9Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
June 4th, 2016, 06:26 AM   #21
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,660
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
Why won't you answer it?
Why have you not answered any of the questions and points that have been put to you? Why should anyone answer your question when you refuse to answer those of others.
v8archie is offline  
 
June 4th, 2016, 07:35 AM   #22
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 125

Quote:
Originally Posted by v8archie View Post
Why have you not answered any of the questions and points that have been put to you? Why should anyone answer your question when you refuse to answer those of others.
Your and skipjack's replies are mathematically vaque, ambiguous, and rambling. I can't find any specific questions. My question is mathematically precise and requires only a yes or no answer:

1) Is 3333.. to n places a natural number for all n? Yes or no please.

You use the term "infinite" to describe the sequence of 3's in .333333.....
2) What is your definition of infinite?

3) What is your question?
zylo is offline  
June 4th, 2016, 09:47 AM   #23
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,660
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
I can't find any specific questions.
Do you not know what a question looks like then? There are loads of questions directed at you, mostly from skipjack. I have asked some questions and given mathematical demonstrations as to why your ideas are incorrect which you have made no attempt to refute.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
1) [U]Is 3333.. to n places a natural number for all n?
I answered this earlier today. But the answer doesn't mean what you want it to, because of your misunderstanding of the term "for all $n$". Your question is rendered imprecise by your usage of "for all $n$".

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
2) What is your definition of infinite?
I have given precise mathematical definitions of finite and infinite in terms of sets and sequences. It's easy to formulate a similar definition for decimals, but I'm not going to waste my effort doing it here. Informally, you may take it as a synonym for "non-terminating".

Your suggestion that skipjack and I have been vague and ambiguous shows that you don't understand the posts. Rather than writing them off, you should seek clarification. The reason you don't do that is because you know that they show your own ideas to be worthless nonsense.
Thanks from manus

Last edited by skipjack; June 4th, 2016 at 09:53 PM.
v8archie is offline  
June 4th, 2016, 11:59 AM   #24
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,720
Thanks: 125

Is 3333.. to n places a natural number for ALL n?

Quote:
Originally Posted by v8archie View Post
...., as you have been told many, many, many times before "for all $n$" includes only finite values of $n$......
My apologies. You did answer my question: yes.
Thanks

A finite set of natural numbers has an upper bound. The set of all natural numbers, though consisting only of finite numbers, has no upper bound, and is countable, just like 333...to n places is a natural number for all n.

So you are relying on your past definition of infinite,
non-finite and non-countably infinite?
A cow is infinite.
zylo is offline  
June 4th, 2016, 12:12 PM   #25
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,660
Thanks: 2635

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
A finite set of natural numbers has an upper bound. The set of all natural numbers, though consisting only of finite numbers, has no upper bound, and is countable
All of this is true. There exist arbitrarily large natural numbers, but all of them are finite.

Quote:
just like 333...to n places is a natural number for all n.
This also is true for finite $n$.

However, the infinite (non-terminating) sequence of 3s 333... is not a natural number as I demonstrated previously.

Quote:
A cow is infinite.
Don't be stupid. If you don't understand, say so and I might try to help... if you haven't exhausted my patience.
Thanks from manus
v8archie is offline  
June 4th, 2016, 11:55 PM   #26
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,644
Thanks: 2084

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
. . . I can't find any specific questions.
I have asked you specific questions in your other threads. In this thread, I have drawn your attention to specific flaws in your posts, but not asked you questions.

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
1) Is 3333.. to n places a natural number for all n?
Yes, for each n, but each natural number is finite, so 3333... (non-terminating) isn't a natural number and there is no natural number n that gives how many digits 3333... has.

Hence it doesn't follow that the reals are countable.
Thanks from manus
skipjack is online now  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Topology

Tags
decimal, infinite, natural, number



Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
natural number multiple of another number if its digit sum equal to that number Shen Elementary Math 2 June 5th, 2014 07:50 AM
Find the infinite sum accurate to three decimal places mathdisciple Calculus 3 April 3rd, 2014 10:57 AM
Infinite set contains an infinite number of subsets durky Abstract Algebra 1 March 15th, 2012 11:28 AM
Difference between a negative number and decimal number? zain Elementary Math 2 April 26th, 2008 01:07 PM
infinite decimal to fraction problem johnny Elementary Math 1 July 19th, 2007 03:27 AM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.