February 2nd, 2016, 10:03 AM  #11 
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 2,159 Thanks: 878 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff. 
I'm just being curious here... zylo: Have you looked up a proof that claims the real numbers are uncountable? What's so wrong with the Cantor proof? Dan 
February 2nd, 2016, 11:38 AM  #12 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,657 Thanks: 2635 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
A decimal with $m \in \mathbb N$ decimal places terminates after $m$ decimal places (otherwise it doesn't have $m$ decimal places). An infinite decimal does not terminate, by definition. So you claim to have decimals that do not terminate that also terminate after $m$ decimal places for some $m \in \mathbb N$. How does that work? You even agreed the other day that all natural numbers are finite. Last edited by skipjack; February 2nd, 2016 at 12:34 PM. 
February 2nd, 2016, 02:54 PM  #13 
Math Team Joined: Nov 2014 From: Australia Posts: 689 Thanks: 244  This is a common misconception about mathematical induction. You can only conclude the result for all finite $n$. Induction gives no information about the infinite case.

February 2nd, 2016, 03:16 PM  #14  
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,633 Thanks: 2080  Quote:
You weren't originally counting the number of decimal places; you were considering the decimals of length $n$, where $n$ is a whole number. Your proposition was that these are countable, which was proved by induction to be correct. However, no such real is irrational, so you didn't prove anything about the irrational reals. In claiming to have done so, you effectively changed the definition of the proposition you were considering.  
February 4th, 2016, 05:20 PM  #15  
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 125  Quote:
p(n) > p(n+!): The number of n+1place decimals is countable. P(n) true for all n (to infinity): All decimals are countable, ie, the reals are countable. I didn't change the proposition Last edited by skipjack; February 4th, 2016 at 05:47 PM.  
February 4th, 2016, 05:35 PM  #16 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,657 Thanks: 2635 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
Yet again: THERE ARE NO INFINITE NATURAL NUMBERS SO YOUR PROOF DOES NOT REFER TO ANY INFINITE DECIMALS ONLY FINITE ONES No proof by induction on $n$ proves anything for infinite $n$, because proofs by induction use the natural numbers, which are all finite. Repeating your error over and over again will never correct it. It just shows how little you understand about what you are talking about. 
February 4th, 2016, 06:58 PM  #17 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,633 Thanks: 2080 
A proof by induction of a proposition P($n$) must establish that P($n$) holds for all finite $n$ because there is no such thing as an infinite value of $n$ (every integer is finite). Such a proof can deal with infinitely many values of $n$, but not any infinite value of $n$, because no such value exists. Although the word "countable" was used in the proof, the number of $n$place decimals for a given value of $n$ is finite, but increases without bound as $n$ increases indefinitely (the sequence obviously couldn't have a finite upper bound). Hence the proof establishes that the set of all terminating decimals (by definition, every $n$place decimal terminates at its $n$th place) is infinite, but countable. The reference to "all decimals", as distinct from all terminating decimals, effectively changed the proposition to include nonterminating decimals that hadn't previously been considered in the proof. Do you now understand, zylo, that you changed the proposition? If not, which of my above five sentences do you fail to understand? 
February 4th, 2016, 07:12 PM  #18 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,720 Thanks: 125 
Induction applies for all n from 1 to infinity. I acknowledge that you don't accept that. "Mathematical induction is a mathematical proof technique, most commonly used to establish a given statement* for all natural numbers" quoted from (* added): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction *The n place decimals are countable. What do you think an nplace decimal is? Last edited by zylo; February 4th, 2016 at 07:15 PM. Reason: reference added 
February 4th, 2016, 07:25 PM  #19 
Math Team Joined: Nov 2014 From: Australia Posts: 689 Thanks: 244  
February 4th, 2016, 07:35 PM  #20 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,657 Thanks: 2635 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  There is no number "infinity". You obviously don't know what the mathematical meaning of the phrase "to infinity" is. Induction is a method of proving a propositions for the natural numbers. All natural numbers are finite. "Infinity" is not a number and it is not a natural number. A proof by induction proves a proposition for finite $n$. An $n$place decimal is one that terminates after $n$ decimal places. In infinite decimal does not terminate at all. 

Tags 
counting, irrational, numbers 
Search tags for this page 
set of all terminating decimals countable?,irrational number count?,Can you count to an irrational number
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Exercises on irrational numbers  AspiringPhysicist  Abstract Algebra  1  October 12th, 2014 04:15 AM 
irrational numbers  Albert.Teng  Algebra  4  February 12th, 2014 04:55 PM 
Irrational numbers  niki500  Number Theory  5  October 7th, 2012 09:10 PM 
Problem on irrational numbers  Deb_D  Number Theory  12  February 20th, 2011 11:50 AM 
Irrational Numbers  Mighty Mouse Jr  Algebra  1  October 16th, 2010 07:46 PM 