My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum


Thanks Tree7Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
July 9th, 2018, 10:00 AM   #71
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 498
Thanks: 164

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
Induction as a means to specify and count all "infinite" place decimals (binaries, radixes). Points on a line.
Induction (recursion actually) will end you up with all finite decimals, but of arbitrary length. This way you'll never end up with infinite decimals.
Micrm@ss is offline  
 
July 9th, 2018, 10:10 AM   #72
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 106

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
$\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} .33333 = .333333....... = 3\bar{n}$

$\displaystyle \lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} .33333 = 1/3$

The first limit is a representation limit (point).

The second lim is a sum limit which gives the distance of the point from the origin.


I can count ALL n-place binaries (or any radix), ie, for n through "infinity."
Induction is how you specify all members of these limits. You can't write them all out.

Skipjack. If you don't like 1,2,3,4,.... as a primary counting mechanism, perhaps you prefer sticks and stones

\
\\
\\\
\\\\
.
.
or
0
00
000
0000
.
.
zylo is offline  
July 9th, 2018, 10:22 AM   #73
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 19,542
Thanks: 1752

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
1,2,3,4,.... are the count.
That doesn't work because

(a) 1, 2, 3, 4, ... (continued without end) doesn't contain the answer for the entire list;

(b) your method doesn't satisfy the criterion "without a number system" ("counting mechanism" seems to be just an alternative phrase for "number system");

and

(c) using a symbol such as "\" or "0" seems to be equivalent to "scratches on a rock".
skipjack is offline  
July 9th, 2018, 10:32 AM   #74
Senior Member
 
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,462
Thanks: 106

a) Induction specifies all elements of a list.
If I specify every element of an infinite sequence (calculus), have I specified every element of the sequence?
b) 1,2,3,4,... IS the number system. You can't count something with itself.

Note that the INFINITE harmonic series is specified by 1/1+1/2+1/3+...... Do you have a problem with that?

Last edited by zylo; July 9th, 2018 at 10:46 AM.
zylo is offline  
July 9th, 2018, 11:15 AM   #75
Senior Member
 
Joined: Oct 2009

Posts: 498
Thanks: 164

Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
a) Induction specifies all elements of a list.
If I specify every element of an infinite sequence (calculus), have I specified every element of the sequence?
b) 1,2,3,4,... IS the number system. You can't count something with itself.

Note that the INFINITE harmonic series is specified by 1/1+1/2+1/3+...... Do you have a problem with that?
OK, this is annoying, please learn the difference between recursion and induction. Cause right now you're just confusing me.
Micrm@ss is offline  
July 9th, 2018, 11:26 AM   #76
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 19,542
Thanks: 1752

Your response, zylo, to (a) relates to the elements only. Specifying the elements isn't the same as counting the entire endless list.

Your response to (b) is inapplicable, as I didn't ask you to count something with itself. I asked how you would count 1, 2, 3, 4, ... (continued without end) without a number system.

As you didn't respond to (c), I assume you now accept that your suggestions that used repetitions of "\" and "0" violate the criterion that you don't use sticks, stones and the like, because you've already withdrawn that type of response.
skipjack is offline  
July 9th, 2018, 05:30 PM   #77
Math Team
 
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,403
Thanks: 2477

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
Originally Posted by zylo View Post
Note that the INFINITE harmonic series is specified by 1/1+1/2+1/3+...... Do you have a problem with that?
Note that the infinite harmonic series has a infinite number of terms but does not have a term $\frac1\infty$.

It's not convergent either.
v8archie is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

Tags
anomaly, decimal, representation



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Decimal Representation and Expansion zylo Real Analysis 14 October 22nd, 2016 11:19 AM
Decimal representation is unique zylo Real Analysis 87 October 19th, 2016 08:55 PM
quadratic representation mhhojati Linear Algebra 0 November 1st, 2015 11:37 PM
Conjecture: Decimal Representation of root John Creighton Number Theory 2 March 14th, 2011 10:03 AM
Decimal To Fraction To Decimal demipaul Linear Algebra 2 November 19th, 2009 05:42 AM





Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.