March 7th, 2018, 08:31 AM  #71  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,010 Thanks: 574  Quote:
You also seem confused about the difference between a sequence and a series. The above is a sequence.  
March 7th, 2018, 08:47 AM  #72 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,403 Thanks: 2477 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Zylo also doesn't understand the difference between "unbounded" and "infinite". I don't understand how someone who is so obviously motivated to investigate mathematics can be comfortable being so ignorant about so many basic facts and definitions. Last edited by v8archie; March 7th, 2018 at 08:59 AM. 
March 7th, 2018, 08:53 AM  #73  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,010 Thanks: 574  Quote:
I would only say that when you write, "If you can make a rationalsounding argument that they are just sequences for which we can always get another element when we need it, the job will be done," you're only restating the problem, not outlining an approach to a solution. But perhaps you've described Goodstein's idea. I have no way to know  
March 7th, 2018, 09:07 AM  #74  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,403 Thanks: 2477 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
I certainly wouldn't suggest that I path to a watertight solution. It really would be restating the existing construction in finitist language. As I say, though, it's interesting how little we appeal to the infinite to create the reals.  
March 7th, 2018, 09:45 AM  #75  
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,462 Thanks: 106  Quote:
Quote:
ZFC Axiom of regularity  
March 7th, 2018, 09:46 AM  #76 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,010 Thanks: 574  That sequence doesn't end. The only kind of sequence that ends is a finite one.

March 7th, 2018, 09:52 AM  #77 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,462 Thanks: 106  
March 7th, 2018, 10:28 AM  #78 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,403 Thanks: 2477 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  You don't seem able to tell the difference, unless your unbounded/infinite sequence is a third option that terminates after an infinite number of terms. (That third option is nonsense, by the way  I thought I'd better say so to avoid confusing you.)

March 8th, 2018, 02:15 AM  #79 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 19,542 Thanks: 1752  By that reasoning, if S_n is defined to be n for all n, and "finite length" is replaced by "finite", you would be asserting that though some values of n are finite, n isn't finite for every n. For what value of n wouldn't n be finite?


Tags 
limit, number 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
upper limit = lower limit implies convergence  zylo  Calculus  13  May 31st, 2017 12:53 PM 
natural number multiple of another number if its digit sum equal to that number  Shen  Elementary Math  2  June 5th, 2014 07:50 AM 
Evaluation of error in limit of number e  date  Calculus  3  June 12th, 2012 11:51 AM 
LIMIT ANALYTHIC OR ROTATION NUMBER?  kiv864  Applied Math  0  November 2nd, 2010 05:38 PM 
how to proof sequence limit for complex number  Anson  Complex Analysis  1  February 16th, 2010 04:25 PM 