February 22nd, 2018, 03:56 AM  #21 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 916 Thanks: 366 
@Maschke I do not think that I suffer from ZDS. I am trying to figure out what zylo's vocabulary means. Apparently, he IMPLICITLY considers zero to be a natural number, which is not a universally accepted definition, but is certainly a definition acceptable to me and many others. I think he means a sequence of nonnegative integers less than 10, but that is not clear and may not be a stipulation necessary to his argument. And I as yet do not see how an infinite sequence of digits representing 100 differs from an infinite sequence of digits representing 1000: in each case, the sequence presumably starts with 1 and is followed by an infinite number of zeroes. If I am wrong in that presumption, Zylo needs to explain how those two real numbers are distinguished. Finally, I doubt it is feasible for humans to forget history and past interactions completely. The decision to close the topic was understandable. The decision to reopen it was likewise understandable. And the warning to try to keep things civil was also understandable. But to ask people to ignore repeated experience is not feasible. I strongly suspect that Archie and others are correct that we are about to get a rehash of arguments made numerous times before. 
February 22nd, 2018, 03:59 AM  #22 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2015 From: England Posts: 758 Thanks: 217 
In England every financial advisor has to provide a government warning to the effect "Past results are not a guide to future performance" 
February 22nd, 2018, 04:02 AM  #23 
Senior Member Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 916 Thanks: 366  But I personally would avoid a financial advisor who has repeatedly gone through bankruptcy. I am not convinced that the wisdom of the state is invariable.

February 22nd, 2018, 04:14 AM  #24  
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,533 Thanks: 513 Math Focus: Yet to find out.  Quote:
But then I was thinking, these are questions pertaining to mathematics. Questions that have clear and rigorous answers. And certainly these are answers that have been given by many of you here, over and over. And they can keep on being given, like a broken record. Heck, even write some tricky software to respond instead.. However I fail to see why, in discussions of mathematics, any thought should be given to history or reputation. A lot of mathematicians take the viewpoint that they are discovering rather than inventing. An archeologist may become well known for successfully discovering and documenting multiple artifacts, but what’s really more important here, the archeologist or the artefact? What does the succcessfulnes of the archeologist have to do with it? This would all be much easier if we weren’t .. human.  
February 22nd, 2018, 04:20 AM  #25  
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,533 Thanks: 513 Math Focus: Yet to find out.  Quote:
The problem is that blocking a user here doesn’t make things dissapear completely, and you end up getting curious about what’s being said anyway.. If the feature removed all threads started by the user for you only, that would be better.  
February 22nd, 2018, 04:28 AM  #26 
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,533 Thanks: 513 Math Focus: Yet to find out. 
I wonder if Zylo is sitting back watching all this and having a real good laugh. The chaos ensues. Alright I’m done. Goodnight.

February 22nd, 2018, 07:20 AM  #27  
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 1,686 Thanks: 666 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff.  Quote:
Dan  
February 22nd, 2018, 07:22 AM  #28 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,282 Thanks: 93 
I meant to elaborate on "Limit". Limit 1) Calculus. $\displaystyle \varepsilon, \delta$ $\displaystyle \lim_{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}}$ .499999 = 1/2. property 2) Limit of nplace decimal as n $\displaystyle \rightarrow \infty$ $\displaystyle \lim_{\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty}}$ .499999 = .4999999..... $\displaystyle \rightarrow$, definition Last edited by skipjack; February 23rd, 2018 at 10:10 AM. 
February 22nd, 2018, 07:53 AM  #29 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 18,686 Thanks: 1522 
Would that point still apply if each "9" were replaced by "0" and the "4" were replaced by 5?

February 22nd, 2018, 08:16 AM  #30 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2015 From: England Posts: 758 Thanks: 217  

Tags 
limits, numbers, real 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Real Numbers and Natural Numbers  zylo  Topology  14  May 10th, 2017 01:57 AM 
Dimensions, and numbers beyond real numbers  Elektron  Math  4  May 7th, 2017 11:47 AM 
Real Analysis: Numerical Sequences (limits)  Luiz  Real Analysis  3  March 23rd, 2015 07:08 AM 
Real Analysis: Numerical Sequences (limits)  Luiz  Real Analysis  1  March 18th, 2015 08:39 AM 
Let a,b be real numbers such that....  thehurtlooker  Algebra  3  April 9th, 2013 12:58 AM 