User Name Remember Me? Password

 Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum

 February 21st, 2013, 05:44 PM #1 Member   Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 31 Thanks: 0 intermediate value theorem For the following proof of the intermediate value theorem ,which i found in wikipedia: Proof: Let S be the set of all x in [a, b] such that f(x) ? u. Then S is non-empty since a is an element of S, and S is bounded above by b. Hence, by completeness, the supremum c = sup S exists. That is, c is the lowest number that is greater than or equal to every member of S. We claim that f(c) = u. Suppose first that f(c) > u, then f(c) ? u > 0. Since f is continuous, there is a ? > 0 such that |?f(x) ? f(c)?| < ? whenever |?x ? c?| < ?. Pick ? = f(c) ? u, then |?f(x) ? f(c)?| < f(c) ? u. But then, f(x) > f(c) ? (f(c) ? u) = u whenever |?x ? c?| < ? (that is, f(x) > u for x in (c ? ?, c + ?)). This requires that c ? ? be an upper bound for S (since no point in the interval (c ? ?, c] for which f > u, can be contained in S, and c was defined as the least upper bound for S), an upper bound less than c. The contradiction nullifies this paragraph's opening assumption. Suppose instead that f(c) < u. Again, by continuity, there is a ? > 0 such that |?f(x) ? f(c)?| < u ? f(c) whenever |?x ? c?| < ?. Then f(x) < f(c) + (u ? f(c)) = u for x in (c ? ?, c + ?). Since x=c + ?/2 is contained in (c ? ?, c + ?), it also satisfies f(x) < u, so it must be contained in S. However, it also exceeds the least upper bound c of S. The contradiction nullifies this paragraph's opening assumption, as well. We deduce that f(c) = u as stated. I have the folowing questions: 1)How does the author come to the conclusion that ,c-? is an upper bound for S ,in this part of the proof: "This requires that c ? ? be an upper bound for S (since no point in the interval (c ? ?, c] for which f > u, can be contained in S, and c was defined as the least upper bound for S), an upper bound less than c. The contradiction nullifies this paragraph's opening assumption" 2) How does the author conclude that ,x = c+?/2 is contained in S ,since he has not proved that in the following part of the proof: "Suppose instead that f(c) < u. Again, by continuity, there is a ? > 0 such that |?f(x) ? f(c)?| < u ? f(c) whenever |?x ? c?| < ?. Then f(x) < f(c) + (u ? f(c)) = u for x in (c ? ?, c + ?). Since x=c + ?/2 is contained in (c ? ?, c + ?), it also satisfies f(x) < u, so it must be contained in S" 3) Nowhere in the proof proves that : a

 Tags intermediate, theorem Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post nubshat Calculus 1 October 23rd, 2013 12:32 AM hooperoo Real Analysis 2 April 16th, 2013 12:40 AM frankpupu Real Analysis 1 February 7th, 2012 10:16 PM frankpupu Calculus 4 January 31st, 2012 01:56 AM Twoxsmart Calculus 1 January 28th, 2009 09:55 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top      