My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum

Thanks Tree3Thanks
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
April 3rd, 2017, 07:40 AM   #51
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,364
Thanks: 100

Some insight into previous post can be gained from:

Volume paradox -- Banach–Tarski

especially the answer to post #17 therein.

Last edited by zylo; April 3rd, 2017 at 07:46 AM.
zylo is offline  
April 3rd, 2017, 08:22 AM   #52
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,364
Thanks: 100

Originally Posted by zylo View Post
Transformation of (a,b] to [0,pi/2) H [0,$\displaystyle \infty$) by inversion, shrinkage, and displacement:

..........-pi/2|...........0|....(.......|pi/2..........].... H

In the same way, without the inversion, (a,b] H (-$\displaystyle \infty$,0].
In general, using inversion, shrinkage/expansion, and displacement:
(a,b] H [a,b) H [0,$\displaystyle \infty$) H [K,$\displaystyle \infty$) H (-$\displaystyle \infty$,0] H (-$\displaystyle \infty$,K]
(a,b) H (c,d) H (-$\displaystyle \infty$,$\displaystyle \infty$)
(a,b) notH [c,d)
a$\displaystyle \neq$b, c$\displaystyle \neq$d, a,b,c,d,K finite.

New Topic: Completenes

Background, Ref Rudin:

Let X and Y denote intervals.
1) Does X H Y and X complete/incomplete imply Y complete/incomplete? Why?
2) Is any open or half=open interval automatically incomplete? f(x)=k on (a,b)?
3) Is [a,$\displaystyle \infty$) complete? See 4).
4) Every convergent sequence in (-$\displaystyle \infty$,$\displaystyle \infty$) converges to a point in (-$\displaystyle \infty$,$\displaystyle \infty$). R is complete. Why is that such a big deal?

PS The reals are both open and closed, by definition of open and closed. Google it.
The first part above on homeomorphism is my response to OP.

I gave relevant extracts from Rudin in order to anchor the discussion, and make it relevant to those who don't have Rudin, without any intent to mislead.
I have long since agreed to the more precise statement that 1/n does not converge in (0,1), but this apparently is the only thing you understand or are willing to discuss.

Please feel free to answer questions with any relevant reference to Rudin, or any other specific reference, regardless of what you think my perception of convergence is, which is irrelevant.
zylo is offline  

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

homeomorphic, mapping

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
About mapping and inverse mapping. idiotinmath Abstract Algebra 1 January 30th, 2015 05:49 AM
Torus T^2 homeomorphic to S^1 x S^1 Math Amateur Real Analysis 0 March 19th, 2014 05:25 PM
R^2 and R^2 - {(0,0)} are not homeomorphic mysterious_poet_3000 Real Analysis 3 April 1st, 2011 10:25 AM
Homeomorphic sets jennifer Real Analysis 1 November 7th, 2007 09:18 AM
homeomorphic parnaz Real Analysis 1 December 13th, 2006 10:50 AM

Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.