December 25th, 2016, 06:18 PM  #1 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding!  How are integers a subset of R^2?
I am reading an Analysis book and it says, "Let us consider the following subsets of $\displaystyle R^2$" It goes on to mention these sets: The set of all integers The set consisting of the numbers $\displaystyle \frac 1n$ for $\displaystyle (n=1,2, 3,...)$ The segment $\displaystyle (a,b)$ My question is, isn't this $\displaystyle R^1$? How is this $\displaystyle R^2$? It may seem obvious, but I really don't know.. Thanks for your help! Last edited by ProofOfALifetime; December 25th, 2016 at 06:20 PM. 
December 25th, 2016, 06:33 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,597 Thanks: 546 Math Focus: Yet to find out. 
Surely you agree that the integers are a subset of the reals? An element of $\mathbb{R^1}$ could be (a), and an element of $\mathbb{R^2}$, (b, c). Does it not follow that the integers are also apart of the $\mathbb{R^2}$ space?

December 25th, 2016, 09:32 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,922 Thanks: 534 
I must say that's a strange way to put things, and I wonder if you've read the book correctly It's true that the set $\{(n, 0)\} \in \mathbb R^2 : n \in \mathbb Z\}$ is commonly identified with the integers, so that we would typically say that the integers are a subset of $\mathbb R^2$ without worrying that this is not strictly true in terms of set theory. In this case we implicitly invoke a structuralist position that anything isomorphic to the integers may be called the integers. There is actually some math philosophy in there; because this example shows that there is something not quite right about using set theory to model mathematical objects. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struct...of_mathematics) In any event, it would be very unusual for an analysis text to refer to the integers as a subset of the plane in the manner you indicate; and likewise your other examples, especially $\{\frac{1}{n}\}$. I wonder if you can double check your book and if possible, post a scan or photo of the page in question. 
December 26th, 2016, 06:19 AM  #4 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding! 
It's Rudin's book Principles of Mathematical Analysis. Anyways, here it is.

December 26th, 2016, 06:23 AM  #5 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding! 
I have always learned that the integers are a subset of the $\displaystyle R^1$. So are we thinking of them as $\displaystyle (n,0)$? Or as $\displaystyle (a,b)$? Like, I said, it just didn't seem clear from the text.
Last edited by ProofOfALifetime; December 26th, 2016 at 06:30 AM. 
December 26th, 2016, 06:26 AM  #6 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding! 
Thank you both for your answers, I'm sorry if the question isn't phrased well or if it's too obvious.

December 26th, 2016, 08:35 AM  #7 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,922 Thanks: 534 
He explicitly says, "Note that (d), (e), and (g) are also subsets of $\mathbb R^1$". And later, he says he's leaving an entry blank because the answer changes depending on whether you consider an open interval to be in $\mathbb R^1$ or $\mathbb R^2$. Those phrases remove the ambiguity. In the other cases the answers don't depend on which space you're considering.

December 26th, 2016, 08:45 AM  #8 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding! 
That doesn't answer my question, the question was, how are those sets viewed as subsets of $\displaystyle R^2$? I guess it just means elements like $\displaystyle (a,b)$where $\displaystyle a$ and $\displaystyle b$are integers. And $\displaystyle (\frac 1n, \frac 1n)$ where $\displaystyle n=1,2,3...$ I just was hoping for some clarification, not just someone to repeat what is already on the page.. 
December 26th, 2016, 10:57 AM  #9  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,922 Thanks: 534  Quote:
@Joppy made the same point before I did. Last edited by Maschke; December 26th, 2016 at 11:02 AM.  
December 26th, 2016, 01:22 PM  #10 
Member Joined: Oct 2016 From: Arizona Posts: 63 Thanks: 15 Math Focus: Still deciding! 
Actually your first response did not sound like clarification, if anything it sounded unsure. It would have helped if you mentioned in your second response that YES what you said earlier is the answer to what I was asking. Oh well! Last edited by ProofOfALifetime; December 26th, 2016 at 01:25 PM. 

Tags 
integers, subset 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Denumerability of a subset of a denumerable subset  bschiavo  Real Analysis  9  October 6th, 2015 11:17 AM 
Subset of a Function g[a] subset g[b]  redgirl43  Applied Math  1  April 21st, 2013 06:20 AM 
Subset of consecutive integers  guru123  Algebra  3  January 15th, 2013 08:05 AM 
subset of permutations  andreaugust  Applied Math  16  June 22nd, 2012 11:42 AM 
Subset of S  sansar  Linear Algebra  1  March 16th, 2009 07:42 AM 