My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
December 22nd, 2016, 05:12 PM   #1
Member
 
ProofOfALifetime's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2016
From: New York

Posts: 49
Thanks: 13

Math Focus: Analysis and Differential Geometry
If A is a set.. sequences of elements in A

What I know:
If A is a set and $\displaystyle {x_n}$ is a sequence of elements of A then it's not necessarily true that the terms $\displaystyle x_1, x_2, x_3,...$ are distinct.

What I'm confused on:
The proof I am reading has a statement, "Arrange the elements of $\displaystyle x$ of A in a sequence $\displaystyle {x_n}$ of distinct elements."

So I get that what they are basically saying is that we are putting the elements of A into sequence, in other words, loosely speaking we are giving each of them a number.

My question is, are we assuming that all the elements of A are distinct? Do we assume that the phrase, "Let A be a set" means that they are distinct elements? If they are not distinct, it doesn't matter right? We still just make a sequence of all of the terms but we would treat the repeated elements as if they are distinct by giving them their own number. (By number I mean their own $x_n$ for some n).

Sorry if this is an "obvious question" but I coudn't find a clear answer in any of the books I have. I am attaching a picture of the proof I am reading.
Attached Images
File Type: jpg 15621747_354409601600954_5568039160211942921_n.jpg (41.6 KB, 5 views)

Last edited by ProofOfALifetime; December 22nd, 2016 at 05:15 PM.
ProofOfALifetime is offline  
 
December 22nd, 2016, 05:46 PM   #2
Member
 
ProofOfALifetime's Avatar
 
Joined: Oct 2016
From: New York

Posts: 49
Thanks: 13

Math Focus: Analysis and Differential Geometry
Okay, so after I posted this I found the answer. We assume that they are distinct because $\displaystyle {2,3, 2, 3, 4, 5, ...}$would not be a valid set. Sorry everyone.
ProofOfALifetime is offline  
February 4th, 2017, 05:40 PM   #3
Math Team
 
Joined: Jan 2015
From: Alabama

Posts: 2,405
Thanks: 611

The sentence "Arrange the elements x of A in a sequence xn of distinct elements"
doesn't say that a general sequence has to have distinct elements, just that we can write all the elements of x in such a sequence. (This is true only for countable sets.)
Country Boy is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Real Analysis

Tags
elements, sequences, set



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sum of elements of a set eddybob123 Applied Math 1 June 24th, 2013 03:45 PM
The Elements mrtamborineman10 Math Books 3 August 22nd, 2011 11:06 PM
Elements liptonpc Applied Math 4 January 25th, 2010 11:08 AM
sequences and series: Arithmetic Sequences cindyyo Algebra 2 August 20th, 2008 02:40 AM
Elements liptonpc Abstract Algebra 1 January 1st, 1970 12:00 AM





Copyright © 2017 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.