
Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
September 3rd, 2016, 12:40 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Dec 2014 From: Italy Posts: 5 Thanks: 0  Is a set with finite Lebesgue measure necessarily bounded?
I consider $\mathbb{R}^n$ with the Lebesgue measure. Let be $\Omega$ subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ with finite measure. Can I say that $\Omega $ is also bounded? Thank you! 
September 3rd, 2016, 06:56 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2015 From: New Jersey Posts: 1,533 Thanks: 107 
No, because it could have infinite points which don't contribute to the measure.

September 3rd, 2016, 01:46 PM  #3 
Global Moderator Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,607 Thanks: 616 
The set could consist of intervals of form (n,n+1/n^2), so the total measure is finite, but the set is not bounded even when excluding subset of measure 0.

September 3rd, 2016, 06:06 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,041 Thanks: 582 
Looking at zylo's and mathman's respective counterexamples (both good!), one is tempted to conjecture that any connected set of reals of finite measure must be bounded. Indeed, a connected set of reals is an interval, finite or infinite. An infinite interval (a ray or the entire real line) has infinite measure. Therefore a connected set of finite measure is a finite interval, which is bounded. Of course connectedness is not necessary, since there are disconnected sets of finite measure that are bounded. Last edited by Maschke; September 3rd, 2016 at 06:19 PM. 
September 9th, 2016, 02:19 PM  #5  
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 471 Thanks: 262 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics  Quote:
 
September 9th, 2016, 04:06 PM  #6  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,041 Thanks: 582  Quote:
 
September 9th, 2016, 06:06 PM  #7 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,041 Thanks: 582 
ps ... found this: geometry  Does simplyconnected imply measureable?  Mathematics Stack Exchange There are indeed nonmeasurable connected sets. 
September 10th, 2016, 02:11 PM  #8  
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 471 Thanks: 262 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics  Quote:
 
September 11th, 2016, 07:52 AM  #9 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 471 Thanks: 262 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics 
Great Example. Much clearer than what I had in mind. Thanks for sharing it.


Tags 
bounded, finite, lebesgue, measure, necessarily, set 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Lebesgue measure  dujdi  New Users  0  December 26th, 2015 06:41 AM 
Lebesgue measure  dujdi  Real Analysis  2  December 26th, 2015 02:18 AM 
Lebesgue measure  limes5  Real Analysis  5  July 20th, 2013 12:08 PM 
Lebesgue measure theory problem  Jeh  Real Analysis  0  July 19th, 2012 09:13 PM 
lebesgue measure  danitg  Real Analysis  0  May 10th, 2009 08:01 AM 