
Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
March 29th, 2016, 11:55 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Mar 2016 From: Sri Lanka Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Ruler Postulate and bijection between uncountable sets
why the Ruler Postulate itself is an another postulate ??? i mean there are postulates to define "Lines" "Points" and "Real Numbers" so why one cannot prove the existence of the ruler postulate using them ??? if it has to be an another postulate then there must be some building blocks behind this "ruler postulate". If it's so, what are them ? [ cause ruler postulate states that there exists a bijection between the set L (points on a line) and the real number set. ] last question  a and b are any two different real numbers, on the real line the coordinates of points 'L' and 'R' are a and b respectively. if a < b then in the real line it's always true that the point 'L' is in the left side of the point 'R'. ( L  R manner ). so if there exist a bijection between the points on a line and the real number set, how one can be certain about the existence of that kind of unique relation ?? Please help me with these questions. 
March 30th, 2016, 02:05 AM  #2  
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2015 From: England Posts: 697 Thanks: 199  Quote:
But Some things are definitions Some are postulates also called axioms Some are propositions, also called lemmas, theorems, or results. Definitions are also given without proof but they usually contain or discuss a single thing, mathematical object etc. Postulates (axioms) contain something additional, they refer to relationships between defined objects. That is they contain more than one thing the object or objects and the relationship. Again they are given without proof Propositions are what we get when we apply the postulates to the definitions in combination. There are usually more propositions than definitions and more definitions than axioms.  
March 30th, 2016, 04:42 PM  #3 
Global Moderator Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,379 Thanks: 542 
Last question: given any bijection that preserves order, there is a related bijection that reverses the order. Examples: f(x)=x and g(x)=x.


Tags 
bijection, postulate, ruler, sets, uncountable 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Ruler Postulate and bijection between uncountable sets  jee  New Users  2  March 30th, 2016 08:19 AM 
Bijection and equal sets  mizunoami  Real Analysis  1  December 6th, 2011 03:09 PM 
Parallel Postulate  julian21  Algebra  2  September 27th, 2010 08:19 PM 
Sets, Countable and Uncountable  Bernie  Applied Math  3  September 9th, 2009 02:28 AM 
AA Postulate  symmetry  Algebra  1  April 1st, 2007 07:11 AM 