
Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
December 30th, 2012, 01:53 AM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Sum of rational numbers is irrational?
There must be some aspect of Taylor's Theorem or perhaps arithmetic which I'm not recalling and would appreciate someone pointing out what it is. The sum of two rational numbers is rational is always true. It can be proven that the exponential function is equal to the sum of its Maclaurin series and in particular when , Since the product of natural numbers are natural numbers meaning factorials are natural numbers and since their reciprocals are ratios of natural numbers (rational), and it can be shown through induction that the partial sum of the first terms of the series, no matter how large we choose is rational, then what happens along the way that makes the infinite sum converge to , an irrational (and transcendental) number? Thank you for the input. 
December 30th, 2012, 05:05 AM  #2  
Math Team Joined: Mar 2012 From: India, West Bengal Posts: 3,871 Thanks: 86 Math Focus: Number Theory  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational? Quote:
.  
December 30th, 2012, 08:44 AM  #3  
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,357 Thanks: 740  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational? Quote:
 
January 1st, 2013, 01:05 AM  #4  
Newbie Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational? Quote:
 
January 1st, 2013, 02:51 AM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2010 From: Staten Island, NY Posts: 152 Thanks: 0  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational?
No proof is needed to show that a statement is false. All that you need to show a statement is false is a counterexample. Here is a simple counterexample: Let x1=.1, x2 = .001, x3 = .000001, x4 = 0000000001, ... These are all terminating decimals, thus rational numbers. But their sum is the irrational number .101001000100001... 
January 1st, 2013, 02:54 AM  #6 
Math Team Joined: Mar 2012 From: India, West Bengal Posts: 3,871 Thanks: 86 Math Focus: Number Theory  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational?
I don't understand, how is this a counterexample to my statement?

January 3rd, 2013, 07:19 AM  #7  
Math Team Joined: Sep 2007 Posts: 2,409 Thanks: 6  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational? Quote:
 
January 3rd, 2013, 10:46 AM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2012 Posts: 294 Thanks: 88  Re: Sum of rational numbers is irrational?
let's take a detour: claim: between every two (unequal) real numbers (rational OR irrational) there lies a rational number. now this is obvious for two rational numbers r and s, because we have x = r + (sr)/2 that fits the bill (assuming r < s). but this doesn't give us much help in the case(s) where r,s or both are irrational. i will do "the hard case" (where both r and s are irrational), you may find it entertaining to try and adapt this to the case where only ONE of r and s is irrational. since r is irrational it lies between two integers, say k and k+1. if s < k, then k will do. if s > k+1, then k+1 will do. so the only difficulty in finding some rational x with r < x < s (or s < x < r) is if k < r,s < k+1. since we can always add k to both sides, we may as well assume r,s are in (0,1). since r ? s, we have r  s = ? < 1. suppose we pick a positive integer N so that N ? 1/? < N+1. now we divide [0,1] into Nths. there will be some positive integer M between 0 and N with: M/N < r < (M+1)/N. note that s is ? ? 1/N away from r, so s in not in the open interval (M/N,(M+1)/N). one of the endpoints is thus a rational number between r and s. ok, what THIS means, is given any irrational number r, we have r in the open interval (r  (1/n), r + (1/n)), for any integer n. this means we can find two rational numbers x_n and x_n' with x_n in (r  (1/n),r) and x_n' in (r,r + (1/n)). how far apart are these two rational numbers? x_n  x_n' ? r  (1/n)  (r + (1/n) = 2/n = 2/n, so they are at most 2/n apart. so as n gets very large, the rational numbers x_n and x_n' get very close to each other. so it's strange, but two sequences of rational numbers can both "converge" to an irrational number. this is similar to how, for an integer n, 1/n can get "very close" to 0, but it never actually "equals" 0. the conclusion is: there must be convergent sequences of rational numbers that are irrational. in fact, this is a profitable way to think of "what" irrational numbers ARE. they are numbers that aren't rational, but can be APPROXIMATED by rationals. most irrational numbers are impossible to list "in their FULL form" (all the decimal digits, for example). the best we can do is get "close enough" (and this approximation, which will not be PERFECT, will be rational). 

Tags 
irrational, numbers, rational, sum 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Rational or Irrational  LucasPR  Abstract Algebra  13  May 1st, 2013 11:32 PM 
Sum of a series: rational or irrational  silenoi  Real Analysis  7  April 24th, 2013 07:27 AM 
Sequence of Irrational Numbers converging to a Rational  Dudealadude  Real Analysis  3  January 24th, 2012 12:43 PM 
rational or irrational  panky  Algebra  4  December 23rd, 2011 09:51 PM 
Distribution of Irrational VS Rational numbers  PseudoCode  Number Theory  2  March 6th, 2009 11:03 PM 