December 26th, 2011, 01:52 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 100 Thanks: 0  Riemann integration
So I think I have part of the following problem, but am stuck on the other bit. Suppose f is a bounded, real valued function on [a,b] and that f^2 is Riemann integrable on [a,b]. Does it follow that f is Riemann integrable? What if we assume that f^3 is Riemann integrable? So I don't think that f^2 being Riemann integrable implies f is; consider the function . Then is certainly Riemann integrable on [a,b], but f is not (would need to show). I'm not sure about if the hypothesis is changed to f^3 being Riemann integrable though. Does this imply that f is Riemann integrable? I think it might, but not sure.. Thanks! 
December 27th, 2011, 06:42 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2011 Posts: 595 Thanks: 16  Re: Riemann integration
Hi, Yes I think your conterexample 1) is good to show that if f^2 is riemann integrable then it does not mean f is riemann integrable. For the other one I guess tath If f was complex then that would still be wrong since you can use the same kind of reasoning with the triple root of unity. if f has only real value (your problem), then I guess that using riemann definition of integration you should be able to derive your result using the fact that f^3 and f have the same sign everywhere. 

Tags 
integration, riemann 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Riemann Integration  fahad nasir  Real Analysis  2  November 28th, 2013 11:22 PM 
Integration requiring Riemann sum  pinsickle  Calculus  1  October 10th, 2010 08:26 PM 
Integration Riemann  Selene01  Calculus  6  July 6th, 2009 06:07 PM 
Riemann Sum help please  pranavpuck  Calculus  2  January 31st, 2009 02:47 PM 
Riemann vs. RiemannStieltjes integral  cheloniophile  Real Analysis  1  November 23rd, 2008 05:30 PM 