My Math Forum number of elments in integers & rationals

 Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum

 June 18th, 2011, 02:43 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Jun 2011 From: Amman-Jordan Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 number of elments in integers & rationals hi all.. i have a question: how can i prove simply to a 7th grade student that even the integers are subset of the rational numbers, but both sets have the same number of elements? thank you..
 June 18th, 2011, 01:31 PM #2 Global Moderator   Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,761 Thanks: 696 Re: number of elments in integers & rationals You could use the standard proof. I'll list the start, with those in [] are omitted, since we count fractions only in lowest terms. The terms are grouped inside {} are those with the numerator + denominator the same. {1/1},{2/1,1/2},{3/1,[2/2],1/3},{4/1,3/2,2/3,1/4},{5/1,[4/2],[3/3],[2/4],1/5},...
 June 19th, 2011, 07:21 PM #3 Member     Joined: Jun 2011 From: California Posts: 82 Thanks: 3 Math Focus: Topology Re: number of elments in integers & rationals A seventh-grader is doing cardinality of infinite sets? Whoa. What are they teaching in 7th grade these days?
 June 20th, 2011, 09:48 AM #4 Newbie   Joined: Jun 2011 From: Amman-Jordan Posts: 2 Thanks: 0 Re: number of elments in integers & rationals mathman... thank you for your help mathematical.. actually they dont take the cardinality of infinite sets.. but they take the properties of sets in general.. naturals, integers, and rationals.. but some student asked.. if the integers are subset of the rationals, then the number of elements in this set are less?! thats why i needed a simple proof for that.. cause its for a 7th grade student!
 June 27th, 2011, 12:01 AM #5 Newbie   Joined: Jun 2011 Posts: 14 Thanks: 0 Re: number of elments in integers & rationals http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galileo%27s_paradox ... In his final scientific work, the Two New Sciences, Galileo Galilei made two apparently contradictory statements about the positive whole numbers. First, some numbers are perfect squares (i.e., the square of some integer, in the following just called a square), while others are not; therefore, all the numbers, including both squares and non-squares, must be more numerous than just the squares. And yet, for every square there is exactly one number that is its square root, and for every number there is exactly one square; hence, there cannot be more of one than of the other. This is an early use, though not the first, of a proof by one-to-one correspondence of infinite sets. .......

 Tags elments, integers, number, rationals

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post shunya Elementary Math 1 November 12th, 2013 12:51 AM Sefrez Applied Math 9 April 25th, 2013 06:25 AM Turiski Real Analysis 6 June 26th, 2011 01:29 PM kindlychung Real Analysis 3 September 26th, 2010 07:42 AM Kenzo Algebra 14 August 13th, 2009 12:29 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top