
Real Analysis Real Analysis Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 13th, 2011, 03:28 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: May 2011 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0  Unit Interval vs. Unit Square Cardinality Question
Hello, I'm currently studying sets and cardinality on my own, and I've come across some nonintuitive results I can't comfortably "fix". I've come to understand that the unit interval [0, 1] and the unit square [0, 1] x [0, 1] have the same cardinality because a onetoone correspondence can be created between them. The only example I have seen of such a correspondence is as follows: Any real number, A, between 0 and 1 inclusive can be represented as digits: 0.a1a2a3a4a5... If (x, y) is a point in the unit square written as (0.x1x2x3x4... , 0.y1y2y3y4y5...) the corresponding point on the unit interval can be written as 0.x1y1x2y2x3y3..., basically "interlocking" the coordinates together. In reverse, A is mapped to (0.a1a3a5..., 0.a2a4a6...) on the square. My problem comes from the ability of some rational numbers to have two decimal expressions. For example, suppose I want to find the point in the unit square where fourfifths is mapped to using the above method. Fourfifths can be written as 0.8000.... or 0.7999.... Using the first expression, A = 0.8000... and x = 0.800... and y = 0.000..., so 0.8 maps to (0.8, 0) Using the second expression, A = 0.7999... and x = 0.7999... and y = 0.999..., so 0.7999... maps to (0.7999..., 0.999...) or (0.8, 1) Two different map results for the same input (just expressed in a different way)? How is this possible? You can go on to see more surprising results in the reverse direction. Mapping (0.8, 0.2) to the unit interval, the coordinate pair can take on four different expressions resulting in four unique mapping locations: (0.8, 0.2) maps to (0.82) (0.7999..., 0.2) maps to (0.72999...) (0.8, 0.1999...) maps to (0.81099...) (0.7999..., 0.1999...) maps to (0.71999...) Does this show that the function is not onetoone? Does this show that the two expressions one can use for the same number are actually different? How can this be justified? Thank you for your time. 
May 13th, 2011, 04:00 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Jun 2010 Posts: 618 Thanks: 0  Re: Unit Interval vs. Unit Square Cardinality Question
miss_direction, The function is not welldefined. To remedy this, you can simply settle on one form of the decimal expansion in the ambiguous cases. Then you will recover a welldefined function which is also a bijection. Ormkärr 
May 13th, 2011, 08:36 PM  #3 
Member Joined: Dec 2010 From: Miami, FL Posts: 96 Thanks: 0  Re: Unit Interval vs. Unit Square Cardinality Question
If 4/5 gets mapped to two distinct points then the function is not injective.


Tags 
cardinality, interval, question, square, unit 
Search tags for this page 
cardinality of square and interval,show that the unit interval [0, 1] and the unit square have the same cardinality.,"show that the function is not one to one",cardinality of the unit square,injection square unit interval
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Solving Poisson equation in a unit square  gasper7  Real Analysis  4  May 23rd, 2013 11:55 PM 
Find the triangles to the nearest square unit  sivela  Algebra  1  February 19th, 2011 07:05 PM 
Any conformal map from square to unit circle?  lumiere137  Complex Analysis  0  October 19th, 2010 05:00 AM 
equidecomposability of unit interval  jason.spade  Real Analysis  3  March 5th, 2010 03:34 PM 
Solving Poisson equation in a unit square  gasper7  Calculus  0  December 31st, 1969 04:00 PM 