My Math Forum

My Math Forum (http://mymathforum.com/math-forums.php)
-   Real Analysis (http://mymathforum.com/real-analysis/)
-   -   A problem from functional analysis (http://mymathforum.com/real-analysis/15100-problem-functional-analysis.html)

tach October 13th, 2010 09:27 AM

A problem from functional analysis
 
Hi

I'm currently following a first course in functional analysis, and a problem from my weekly assignment is bothering me quite a bit. It would be greatly appreciated if anyone could give me a hint or maybe even go through the steps in the solution. The problem is given below.

For a normed vector space , we denote by the space of bounded linear operators .

(The problem)
Let be a complex vector space with an inner product and assume that .
1) Show that for all if and only if is the zero operator.
2) Show next that for all if and only if is the zero operator.
3) Are these results true if the vector space is a real vector space?

mathman October 13th, 2010 04:00 PM

Re: A problem from functional analysis
 
1. and 2. The if parts are trivially obvious.

For 1. If Tx = y ? 0 for some x, the (Tx,y) ? 0. Therefore only if.
For 2. Simple example: 2 dimensional space with base vectors a and b, with (a,b)=0. Let Ta=b and Tb=-a, then (Tx,x)=0 for all x, therefore only if is false.

I don't see any distinction between real and complex spaces. However you may have to use complex conjugates for complex spaces in the above analysis.

mathman October 15th, 2010 01:42 PM

Re: A problem from functional analysis
 
Correction: The analysis for 1. holds for both both real and complex vector spaces. The analysis for 2. is only for real vector spaces. I believe that 2. is true for complex vector spaces, but I haven't been able to work it out completely.

mattpi October 16th, 2010 06:00 AM

Re: A problem from functional analysis
 
Suppose V is complex, and for all

Then for all

and

Expand these out, and you should be able to deduce that for all and therefore (2) reduces to (1).

tach October 20th, 2010 05:53 AM

Re: A problem from functional analysis
 
Thanks for responding both of you. I solved the problem in the following way (hopefully no typo's)

1)
The if part is trivial. The only if part I show by contraposition. Let be any operater in but not the zero operator. Then there exists such that and so we have . Choose and then we have found such that . Thus must be the zero operator.

2)
Again the if part is trivial. The only if part I show by choosing again as any operator in but not the zero operator. Then we know there exists such that . Assume now that . Then we have





Thus must be the zero operator.

3)
These results are not true if is a real vector space. This is showed by an example. Choose and let be given by for . Then is linear, bounded and not the zero operator. Equip with the standard inner product and then we have for all .


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:57 PM.

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.