April 30th, 2010, 11:21 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Riemann/Darboux Integral
Hello to everyone. I have a question. Is the Riemann Integral really equivalent to Darboux Integral?. For example, consider the function f(x)=sin(x)/x. I want to know if it is integrable between 1 and 1. The problem arises at x=0. Now, this function is clearly Darboux integrable, since you solve the problem of the nonexistance of f(0) with the supremum operator. But I don't think it is Riemann integrable, since you can not evaluate f(0), and the Riemann definition clearly states that the sum must exist fon ANY election of evaluation numbers. If you defined f(0) as 1, you would not be solving the problem, because you would be integrating a different function,not f(x), since you are changing the domain of the function. So, is it right if i say that the Darboux and Riemann integral are equivalent iff f(x) is welldefined for all the points in the interval? I will deeply appreciate any replies. 
May 1st, 2010, 12:52 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: May 2007 Posts: 6,527 Thanks: 588  Re: Riemann/Darboux Integral
Further comment: It is no more Darboux integrable than Riemann integrable if it is undefined at x=0.

May 1st, 2010, 08:32 PM  #3 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2010 Posts: 1 Thanks: 0  Re: Riemann/Darboux Integral
Thank you for your answer man.


Tags 
integral, riemann or darboux 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
riemann integral!!!  sedasen  Calculus  1  March 25th, 2013 08:25 AM 
Riemann sum/Integral  ralphbs  Calculus  2  January 22nd, 2013 07:56 PM 
Riemann/Darboux Integral  DavidDante  Real Analysis  1  May 1st, 2010 12:46 PM 
Riemann vs. RiemannStieltjes integral  cheloniophile  Real Analysis  1  November 23rd, 2008 05:30 PM 
riemann integral  access_nash  Calculus  1  November 9th, 2008 10:29 PM 