My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > High School Math Forum > Probability and Statistics

Probability and Statistics Basic Probability and Statistics Math Forum


Thanks Tree5Thanks
Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
February 18th, 2019, 02:29 PM   #1
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2019
From: Scotland

Posts: 6
Thanks: 0

Number of steps to form 1 fluid oz

Jane wants to have two separate 1 fluid ounce measures of water at the same time. However the only measures she has are for six, ten and fifteen fl oz. Show how this could be done in the smallest number of steps without marking the measures or using any container other than the original large beaker of water. The only steps allowed are filling or emptying a measure or transferring water from one measure to another.
RachelGreen is offline  
 
February 18th, 2019, 04:27 PM   #2
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,212
Thanks: 654

You can fill the ten, pour it into the fifteen, then fill the six and pour it into the fifteen. Now you have 1 ounce in the six.

Now you need a second ounce, but you can no longer use the six? Or if you can, pour the contents of the six (the 1 ounce) into the empty beaker, if you're allowed to empty the beaker. Now repeat the same procedure and you end up with 1 ounce in the beaker and 1 ounce in the six.

How one shows that's the minimum solution, I don't know. Can we empty the beaker? You said we can empty the measures, did you mean to exclude emptying the beaker? If you can't empty the beaker you have no place to put that one ounce that won't interfere with getting the second ounce. Unless there's some other way.
Thanks from Estermont

Last edited by Maschke; February 18th, 2019 at 04:30 PM.
Maschke is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 02:16 AM   #3
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2019
From: Scotland

Posts: 6
Thanks: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Maschke View Post
You can fill the ten, pour it into the fifteen, then fill the six and pour it into the fifteen. Now you have 1 ounce in the six.

Now you need a second ounce, but you can no longer use the six? Or if you can, pour the contents of the six (the 1 ounce) into the empty beaker, if you're allowed to empty the beaker. Now repeat the same procedure and you end up with 1 ounce in the beaker and 1 ounce in the six.

How one shows that's the minimum solution, I don't know. Can we empty the beaker? You said we can empty the measures, did you mean to exclude emptying the beaker? If you can't empty the beaker you have no place to put that one ounce that won't interfere with getting the second ounce. Unless there's some other way.
No I don't think it's allowed since they specifically mentioned what the operations were... You can use the measures again though.
RachelGreen is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 06:22 AM   #4
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 14,146
Thanks: 1003

Quote:
Originally Posted by RachelGreen View Post
No I don't think it's allowed .....
Why not? Problem states:
"...or using any container other than the original large beaker of water."
So you can USE it, right?
Perhaps you can ask your teacher..."I don't think" is not allowed in maths!!
Thanks from Estermont and RachelGreen
Denis is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 07:42 AM   #5
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,386
Thanks: 2012

The rules permit using the beaker, but emptying the beaker isn't a valid step.

However, Maschke's procedure can be modified to work, though requiring more steps.

After Maschke's first 4 steps, transfer 10 from the 15 to the 10, then empty the 15, transfer all the water in the 10 to the 15, refill the 10 from the beaker, transfer 5 from the 10 to the 15 (filling it), and then empty the 15. You now have 1 in the 6, 5 in the 10 and the 15 is empty. Transfer the 1 in the 6 to the 15, fill the 6, and then transfer 5 from the 6 to the 10 (filling it). There is now 1 in the 6, 10 in the 10 and 1 in the 15, achieving the desired objective after a total of 13 steps. I don't know whether a shorter method is possible.
Thanks from Maschke and RachelGreen
skipjack is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 08:01 AM   #6
Newbie
 
Joined: Jan 2017
From: London

Posts: 11
Thanks: 0

I found a similar question but with 2 "jugs" instead of 3...

https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...-of-operations

I don't really understand everything but maybe it could be applied for this question?
Estermont is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 08:11 AM   #7
Newbie
 
Joined: Feb 2019
From: Scotland

Posts: 6
Thanks: 0

Quote:
Originally Posted by Estermont View Post
I found a similar question but with 2 "jugs" instead of 3...

https://math.stackexchange.com/quest...-of-operations

I don't really understand everything but maybe it could be applied for this question?
Thanks! So.. What they're saying is that there can be a general algorithm for this? Wouldn't it be a lot more complex with 3 measures though?
RachelGreen is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 09:52 AM   #8
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 14,146
Thanks: 1003

Quote:
Originally Posted by skipjack View Post
The rules permit using the beaker, but emptying the beaker isn't a valid step.
What meanest thou?
If the rules did NOT permit using the beaker, then where
would the water come from?
You HAVE to use the beaker: it's the source of the water...no?

If beaker is used only as a water source, then there is no need
to mention it, and the problem would be CLEAR this way:

Jane wants to have 2 separate 1 ounce measures of water at the same time.
However the only measures she has are for 6, 10 and 15 ounces.
So she needs to end up with 2 of these 3 measures containing 1 ounce each.
Show how this could be done in the smallest number of steps,
without marking the measures or using any other container.
The only steps allowed are filling or emptying a measure or transferring
water from one measure to another.
Assume the kitchen water tap is used as the source of water!
Denis is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 12:05 PM   #9
Math Team
 
Joined: Oct 2011
From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada

Posts: 14,146
Thanks: 1003

I "nervously!" have a 10 step solution (water from kitchen tap!):
Code:
STEP [15] [10]  [6]
         0       0     0
  1     0     10     0 : fill [10]
  2    10      0     0 : [10] to [15]
  3    10      0     6 : fill [6]
  4    15      0     1 : fill [15] from [6]
  5     5     10     1 : fill [10] from [15]
  6     0     10     1 : empty [15]
  7    10      0     1 : dump [10] in [15]
  8    10      1     0 : dump [6] in [10]
  9    10      1     6 : fill [6]
 10   15      1     1 : fill [15] from [6]
Am I ok or did I goof?
Denis is offline  
February 19th, 2019, 06:38 PM   #10
Global Moderator
 
Joined: Dec 2006

Posts: 20,386
Thanks: 2012

That works. There's another solution in 10 steps, and 10 seems to be the minimum number of steps.
skipjack is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > High School Math Forum > Probability and Statistics

Tags
fluid, form, number, steps



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
No. of ways to form a number Punch Algebra 2 January 29th, 2012 04:35 AM
Complex Number in Cartersian form kent162 Complex Analysis 1 October 29th, 2011 05:38 AM
How many more steps must she climb to have the number below. sivela Math Events 3 February 23rd, 2011 12:31 AM
Expected number of steps to go from state i to state j zeroman89 Advanced Statistics 3 October 7th, 2010 02:35 PM
Complex number and polar form BlackOps Algebra 2 June 22nd, 2008 04:01 PM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.