 My Math Forum removable discontinuities in rational functions
 User Name Remember Me? Password

 Pre-Calculus Pre-Calculus Math Forum

 December 4th, 2018, 08:19 PM #1 Senior Member   Joined: Sep 2015 From: USA Posts: 2,574 Thanks: 1422 removable discontinuities in rational functions So I was taught that $f(x) = \dfrac{(x+1)(x-2)}{x+1} = x-2$ is continuous. I'm reading online now that $x=-1$ is considered a removable discontinuity, i.e. a "hole" If this is the case what stops us from creating infinite holes in any continuous function by multiplying by 1 in the fashion $\tilde{f}(x) = f(x)\prod \limits_{k=1}^\infty \dfrac{x-a_k}{x-a_k}$ where $a_k$ is any sequence of real numbers What's the current convention on removable singularities? December 5th, 2018, 12:09 AM #2 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 21,019 Thanks: 2254 Nothing stops you from doing that. It's equivalent to not defining the function at infinitely many values of $x$. December 5th, 2018, 05:08 AM   #3
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2016
From: USA

Posts: 666
Thanks: 437

Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics
Quote:
 Originally Posted by romsek So I was taught that $f(x) = \dfrac{(x+1)(x-2)}{x+1} = x-2$ is continuous.
Strictly speaking, $\dfrac{(x+1)(x-2)}{x+1} = x-2$ is not true which is essentially the point. The expressions are equal except when $x=-1$ in which case the expression on the left is not defined while the expression on the right is $-3$. In this case, we would define the function $f_1(x) = \dfrac{(x+1)(x-2)}{x+1}$ and the function $f_2(x) = x-2$, and then $f_2$ is referred to as the continuous extension of $f_1$.

This difference is often hammered during a Calc 1 course since students at this level don't understand limits, and they don't understand that functions aren't just formulas.

At the level of a first real analysis course or higher, it is very typical to make no distinction between a function with removable singularities and its continuous extension. For example, a statement like:

"$f(x) = \frac{\sin x}{x}$ is continuous on $\mathbb{R}$" would not be atypical to see and should be considered as a true statement.

What is meant by this, is that $\lim_{x \to 0} f(x) = 1$ so the function being described is assigned the value $f(0) = 1$ which makes it continuous. This is cumbersome to say over and over so when the audience understands limits and continuity a long explanation of this is typically omitted. Tags discontinuities, functions, rational, removable questioning answering forum of probility

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Zery Pre-Calculus 3 August 14th, 2015 05:21 PM Zery Pre-Calculus 3 August 8th, 2015 10:38 AM edwinandrew Algebra 1 November 27th, 2013 04:31 PM mathkid Algebra 5 September 22nd, 2012 06:44 PM Paper_Scars Algebra 1 March 23rd, 2012 09:02 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top       