November 10th, 2014, 05:48 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 From: Germany Posts: 179 Thanks: 1 Math Focus: Number Theory  Are we living in a @ light speed spinning black hole? http://www.sciencepubco.com/index.ph...view/2765/1192 Throughout the cosmic evolution, currently believed cosmic ‘critical density’ can be shown to be a default result of the ‘positively curved’ light speed rotating black hole universe ‘volume density’. As there is no observational or experimental evidence to Friedmann’s second assumption, the density classification scheme of Friedmann cosmology must be reviewed at fundamental level and possibly can be relinquished. The observed cosmic redshift can be reinterpreted as an index of ‘cosmological’ thermodynamic light emission mechanism. Clearly speaking during cosmic evolution, at any time in the past, in hydrogen atom emitted photon energy was always inversely proportional to the cosmic temperature. Thus past light emitted from older galaxy’s excited hydrogen atom will show redshift with reference to the current laboratory data. Note that there will be no change in the energy of the emitted photon during its journey from the distant galaxy to the observer. In no way ‘redshift’ seems to be connected with ‘galaxy receding’. By considering the ‘Stoney mass’ as the initial mass of the baby cosmic black hole, past and current physical and thermal parameters (like angular velocity, growth rate, age, redshift, thermal energy density and matter density) of the cosmic black hole can be understood. For a cosmic temperature of 3000 K, obtained redshift is 1100. From now onwards, CMBR temperature can be called as ‘Comic Black Hole’s Thermal Radiation’ temperature and can be expressed as ‘CBHTR’ temperature. Current cosmic black hole is growing at a rate of 14.66 km/sec in a decelerating mode. Uncertainty relation and all other microscopic physical constants play a crucial role in understanding the halt of the present cosmic expansion. In view of the confirmed zero rate of change in inverse of the Fine structure ratio (from the ground based laboratory experimental results), zero rate of change in the current CMBR temperature (from satellite data) and zero rate of change in the current Hubble’s constant (from satellite data), it can be suggested that, current cosmic expansion is almost all saturated and at present there is no significant cosmic acceleration. ************** I think this paper prooved it?! 
November 10th, 2014, 06:33 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Apr 2014 From: Glasgow Posts: 2,164 Thanks: 736 Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions 
The link doesn't work. Can you try a different one?

November 10th, 2014, 10:47 AM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 From: Germany Posts: 179 Thanks: 1 Math Focus: Number Theory  Basics of the decelerating black hole universe viXra.org ePrint archive, viXra:1405.0330, Basics of the Decelerating Black Hole Universe International Journal of Advanced Astronomy, 2 (1) (2014) 822, doi: 10.14419/ijaa.v2i1.2765 Older Paper: http://www.pteponline.com/index_fil...0/PP2102.PDF Last edited by M_B_S; November 10th, 2014 at 10:54 AM. 
November 10th, 2014, 12:30 PM  #4 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  Published by Science Publishing Corporation, which is listed as a predatory publisher: LIST OF PUBLISHERS  Scholarly Open Access Its website appears to be have been pulled. I'd be rather cautious about the results published here. (Caution is pretty good advice in general, but applies even more strongly here.) 
November 10th, 2014, 02:03 PM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 From: Germany Posts: 179 Thanks: 1 Math Focus: Number Theory  American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics
Mmh Have you read it?! American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics American Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics :: Science Publishing Group 
November 10th, 2014, 05:37 PM  #6 
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 2,305 Thanks: 962 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff. 
I read the Abstract in the link posted and I can't really say anything directly against it except for the fact it contains many ideas I've never heard in the mainstream...but there's no real sin in that. However I looked at the list of references and I admit that it doesn't give me a lot of comfort about the theory. For example, Hawking's "layman's level" book "A Brief History of Time" is cited as well as reference [21] U.V.S. Seshavatharam. The Primordial Cosmic Black Hole and the Cosmic Axis of Evil. International Journal of Astronomy, 1(2): 2037, (2012). I didn't look it up but the title gives me no confidence at all. That being said there has been a lot of serious speculation that the Universe started with a singularity and we are still within its Schwarzchild radius, so I won't discard the article out of hand, either. Dan 
November 10th, 2014, 06:01 PM  #7 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms 
I think that the idea that the whole universe is in a black hole is unsurprising; I've often considered that to be the case. But this paper gives me no confidence that it is true.

November 10th, 2014, 10:40 PM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 From: Germany Posts: 179 Thanks: 1 Math Focus: Number Theory 
Thanks for your answers! But what do you say to the mathematical "proof" of the Hubble Constant H_u? It would be a realy easy solution of mother nature if our Universe is a @ light speed spinning Black Hole. (No Hair Unification) The main argument I think is the fact that there is NO physical singularity in a spinning Black Hole. E_u = (M_u*C³)/(C²V²)^(1/2) M_u = (T_u* C³)/(2*G) => E_u = (T_u*M_u*C^6)/(2*G*((C²V²)^(1/2)) ; V=0 => E_u = T_u*M_u*C^5/(2*G) Kerr where T_u = 1/H_u => E_u = (M_u*C^5)/(2*G*H_u) So logical follows if we are in a Black Hole the Black Hole = Our Universe is gaining mass=energy in time because it is a Black Hole in a Black Hole Multiverse (BHM). http://www.insidescience.org/content...wuniverse/566 (Prof. Kaku on BHM) Last edited by M_B_S; November 10th, 2014 at 10:56 PM. 
November 11th, 2014, 05:15 AM  #9  
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  Quote:
I should also mention that there's very good reason to think that massive particles can't travel at the speed of light, so I don't accept that the rotation is that fast (if I concede the general idea that we're inside a black hole, which as I've said sounds entirely plausible to me). Quote:
That would seem to be a strike against the conjecture, no?  
November 11th, 2014, 06:05 AM  #10  
Senior Member Joined: Nov 2013 From: Germany Posts: 179 Thanks: 1 Math Focus: Number Theory  Quote:
A) Solution: all matter in a Black Hole is destroyed to massless particles = photons in time. =>B) Big Bang B) There will be light:= Genesis of a new born Universe C) Matter is created by photon collidering (=>Gravitation) Experiment soon: http://www.photonics.com/Article.aspx?AID=56211 => Creation of new Black Holes possible Universes M_B_S Last edited by M_B_S; November 11th, 2014 at 06:16 AM.  

Tags 
black, hole, light, living, speed, spinning 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Fractal dimension of snowflake falling into black hole  BenFRayfield  Physics  1  February 17th, 2014 11:13 AM 
Whats inside a black hole?  BenFRayfield  Physics  0  September 21st, 2013 05:25 PM 
Doc Browns Dilemna My Delorean won't reach light speed  HenryMolaison  Physics  6  June 24th, 2013 04:36 PM 
Frames of reference and the speed of light  proglote  Physics  23  August 26th, 2011 06:01 AM 
How does the inverse square law of light effect light intens  moore778899  Elementary Math  0  January 16th, 2011 07:20 AM 