My Math Forum The realms of the Observed VS Unobserved

 Physics Physics Forum

 August 13th, 2019, 04:24 PM #1 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 The realms of the Observed VS Unobserved This post predicts what happens when Spacetime gets involved with unobserved quantum waves from the act of observation. The act of Observation/Measurement is a request of quantum wave information to Spacetime. The interaction is someone purposely placing a detector wanting a particle to be physical. You make a request by setting something that can analyze the particle during its life/path. The state of a particle is decided before it starts. Double slit interpretation: Randomly shot particles are shot through a double slit, if no one places a detector in the path of the particle, the unobserved particle will be in the form of two waves (one for each slit) . Depending on the which wave ends up with more energy (after the split) ..the final position of a channel representing a fringe will be the final resting place of the now collapsed particle. If the energy wasn't unbalanced, I would expect to see only a single channel of fringe be filled in. Now a detector gets placed anywhere along the path between the cannon and the final landing screen. The particle shot will be collapsed upon leaving the cannon because the state of the particle has already been decided. It won't be waves, just a particle. It's been pulled from the unobserved quantum realm and made physical in Spacetime. It will go through one slit and hit the final screen in a normal clump. If you accept this interpretation ..then you accept a particle being either a particle or waves ..not both at the same time. You now also know that placing a detector in an experiment is a request from a human to the realm of unobserved QM to swap quantum waves into something physical. Observation is then a property of Spacetime. Observation is the reason Spacetime exits. General Relativity = Spacetime = the theory of the large scale Unobserved QM = Waves = the theory of the small scale They are both realms in the same domain Observed (Spacetime) vs Unobserved (Quantum Waves) Observation is then a request to bring an object from one realm to the other. Observation is the bridge between the two. The theory of the very large and small are unified. This is conditional statement that formulates a Theory of Everything: If (spacetime object){ //larger than abbes diffraction limit (or the equivalent mass energy levels - quanta) OR being observed current situation = General Relativity; } else{current situation = Unobserved QM; } //The particle collapses no matter the state when it hits a predefined Spacetime object. There is a duality of realms, but the object in question is either in one or the other. Duality is impossible for particles if it can tunnel or fit through a space smaller than its structure. Waves can do that sort of thing ..not physical (observed) objects. The delayed choice quantum eraser shows us that the entire life of the particle is known. It's about the entire life of both entangled particles. The first particle knows if the partner will ever be observed. This is where I go a bit off the deep end (you are welcome to ignore this paragraph): The reason for Spacetime to exist is for living things to be able to observe. Living things wouldn't like being in an unobservable world.There isn't a logical reason for Spacetime to exist. Spacetime was written to use unobserved wave information for mortals. I've had time to consider what my post implies and it points at a god being involved. Not a god man has described, but one bored out of its existence. The meaning of life is to entertain a god with nothing but time to waste. Each observation we make is something to entertain this god. The realm of unobserved quantum waves has always been and always will be. Spacetime has a beginning. Unobserved quantum waves don't need anything from Spacetime to function. Gravitons don't exist. Photons don't use our version of time. The distance a photon travels doesn't matter. If we request it, its state has been decided. I want to add that I think there is a good chance a black hole is a spherical gap in Spacetime with the unobservable quantum realm exposed. The event horizon is still spacetime, but inside that is quantum waves. The cause of a polarized eraser with the double slit is the same for quantum uncertainty. You have a double slit with opposite linear polarizers at each slit. You get an observed clump. You then add a 45 degree polarizer and the fringes come back. It's not because the which way information is getting erased. It's because the particle starts a new life when passing through multiple filters. The state of a particle is predetermined based on the path it will fly through. But something interesting happens with you place multiple detectors. The particles state is reassessed while passing through a polarizer. If it sees another polarizer in its path it's going to cycle back to being a wave. Atoms normally shake around with thermal energy ..but not as much as quantum uncertainty makes them appear to be doing. The Uncertainty Principle is a side effect from repeated requests to make the QM object real/physical. It's a delay/smear from the system not being able to process quick enough. Swapping from wave to particle is apparently taxing, especially if it has to do it to each observed event (frame/timeline), for momentum tests. A simple double slit example shows us that a particle can be requested to decohere and remain decohered until it hits the final screen. An Uncertainty Principle test requires several requests of decoherence to get the momentum. What's newly discovered is that each request is causing the particle to cycle from wave to particle, setting fuzziness because it wasn't fast enough to do the swap. If you are measuring something that isn't remaining in the same state, you can't blame the detectors of decoherence anymore. It was ridiculous to assume a detector capable of displaying both coherence and decoherence was the cause anyways. Thanks from idontknow
 August 13th, 2019, 11:57 PM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Dec 2015 From: somewhere Posts: 712 Thanks: 96 This seems like difference between normal clock with atomic-quantum clock.I agree with many statements you wrote above. Thanks from scifimath
 August 16th, 2019, 01:52 PM #3 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 To add more flames to my theory: "Dark" implies something is unobservable. So that's what Dark Matter/Energy are. Dark Energy is the unobservable quantum field. Quantum objects don't use spacetime, but spacetime's gravity can bend the fabric of the quantum field. Dark Matter is matter that normally would convert over to spacetime naturally but doesn't. It's found in abundance as halos around galaxies. Which leads me to believe it's a substance that held together galaxies before spacetime was turned on.
 August 21st, 2019, 02:09 PM #4 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 Time doesn't pass in a black hole (past the event horizon) because unobserved quantum waves don't use time. If unobserved quantum waves don't use time, is it a safe bet they are using frequency instead? The quantum field is usually intermixed with spacetime, but apparently it doesn't always have to be.
 August 21st, 2019, 03:01 PM #5 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 Does anyone here have an account on newscientist.com? I've got to know if my ideas were just stolen. https://www.newscientist.com/article...ime-all-wrong/
 September 10th, 2019, 02:43 PM #6 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 The uncertainty principle and bell's theorem could prove me wrong, but I can prove them incomplete. Uncertainty is only considering waves and Bell is only considering spin. Hmm, maybe it isn't the path after-all. It just happens to know the path because knowing what state it will be would show the same thing. The delayed choice quantum eraser is my proof. It clearly shows the state is decided before either entangled particle even starts moving. Unobserved quantum waves not having spacetime is a very big deal. Without time, its life is instantaneous. No need for a god or path info. Boom! Quantum physics is changed from this day forward.
 September 18th, 2019, 04:19 PM #7 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 Unobserved(stateless/unphysical) Quantum Waves + State (physicality) = Spacetime (General Relativity)
 September 22nd, 2019, 04:57 AM #8 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 Unobserved(stateless/unphysical) Quantum Waves + State (physicality) = Spacetime (GR) Unobserved waves are unphysical, but ones with state change experience duality and get spacetime involved. Observation doesn't always mean Quantum Observation. What matters is if a state change happens. State is a binary physicality variable. I'm now questioning whether it's even necessary to declare observation is involved in the double slit. It's accepted that observation means measurement ... but all the experiment cares about is a wave's state change while it's moving (and is allowed to continue moving). Observation would just be something that occurred after the experiment was over. It didn't influence the outcome. A wave would never reach something able to change its state ... unless there were two instances of state changes in its path (which-way eraser). I found a new quantum trick the unobservable is able to achieve. While a new wave formulates, it is able to know if its state will change during its journey ... before it even starts to move. The unobservable is all time, all the time for a physicality variables. Unobserved quantum waves not having spacetime is a very big deal. Without time from spacetime, its life is instantaneous. The delayed choice quantum eraser demonstrates this. The only way the first entangled particle knows if the partner will ever be observed is if the state is known for the life of both entangled particles. Is quantum which-way information the real cause? Which-way has nothing to do with it. The final panel is wave collapse and doesn't effect the outcome like a state change does. I figured out what is happening in an experiment that is "erasing" the "which-way" (with a polarizer). A Double slit with opposite polarizers ..and then an extra polarizer down the line acting as an "eraser"; State (physicality) of a particle is decided while it's being created. State changes are detected pre-emptively. When two detectors are in its path, its state would be changing twice. In this case, the particle is sent as an unobserved wave. What we are witnessing is what happens when a quantum wave actually goes through double slits and do not interact with polarizers. Proving that a polarizer only effects physical photon light because a single state change would have sent a physical photon at the double slits to go through a single slit. I asked the forbidden question in physics and found a bridge to reality. or should I say it's a bridge to the simulation? Spacetime may be an analog simulation built on the quantum field. It doesn't make any sense for light to have a speed limit. Spacetime must have a frame rate. If Spacetime is a simulation, State is the object being added to the program. Perhaps the frame rate is based off the speed something can be observed. Somewhere around 0.3 μm (micrometers) naturally gives a object a physical state. This is the distance light can travel in a femtosecond. This would mean spacetime has a frame rate of 1,000,000,000,000,000 frames per second. Don't bring up Planck, it isn't the size that determines if something is automatically physical. The Higgs Field is nothing special. It's just another field in the Quantum Field that interacts with Spacetime when the object needs to be physical. Black holes spaghettify matter and turn its physicality state off. Dark matter is matter that doesn't have the ability to have a physical state. Black holes are not deleting information, it's just making it unobservable. The holographic principle sounded like a long shot anyways. Last edited by skipjack; September 22nd, 2019 at 01:07 PM.
 September 24th, 2019, 02:33 PM #9 Newbie   Joined: Aug 2019 From: Pittsburgh Posts: 27 Thanks: 1 State = Physical = is NOT in the form of unobserved quantum information/variables or quantum field excitations
 September 24th, 2019, 03:00 PM #10 Math Team     Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 2,298 Thanks: 959 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff. Once again unto the breachand all I see that you haven't given up on this. You would be better off spending some time researching what you are trying to say. -Dan

 Tags observed, realms, unobserved

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post samloomis Algebra 5 June 10th, 2011 12:20 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top