June 7th, 2018, 02:23 AM  #11  
Senior Member Joined: Apr 2014 From: Glasgow Posts: 2,142 Thanks: 726 Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions  Is it? There's no evidence to differentiate yay or nay. Everyone can agree that if you take an expanding universe and extrapolate backwards in time, you get a smaller and smaller volume of space, but was cosmogenesis the beginning of "everything"? Some cosmologists hypothesise that there are many crunch/big bang cycles, in which case the big bang we observe is just one of many that have happened. Furthermore, some hypothesise that the observable Universe may just be part of a bigger Universe with many big bangs in it, in which case the "start" is just the moment in time which corresponds to the big bang that we observe with the rest being beyond the observable universe. Again, there's no evidence to differentiate any of this stuff, but it provides context and reveals just how little we know about our own observable Universe at the largest scales. Quote:
Quote:
Cosmology is a nascent field and is developing all of the time, but it is easy to ask difficult questions and very difficult to find answers.  
June 7th, 2018, 09:01 AM  #12 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: USA Posts: 2,370 Thanks: 1274 
Given the horizon caused by the expansion of spacetime I think there are going to be questions we simply will never have the data to answer.


Tags 
bang, big, quasars, similarities, supernovae 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Simple Arithmetic that makes me bang my head  cold4betbluff  Algebra  4  June 19th, 2016 05:49 AM 
How to quantify differences/ similarities between groups of like objects?  sgodphoto  Linear Algebra  0  February 21st, 2016 09:58 PM 
What are the similarities of differential and integral calcu  winnie  Differential Equations  1  December 8th, 2012 08:23 AM 