User Name Remember Me? Password

 Physics Physics Forum

 February 4th, 2016, 08:09 PM #1 Member   Joined: Jun 2013 Posts: 42 Thanks: 0 please explain this momentum problem A 40gram bullet is fired with a speed of 300m/s into a ballistic pendulum of mass 5kg suspended from a chord 1m long. Compute the vertical height through which the pendulum rises. Solution: m1v1+m2v2 = m1v1'+m2v2' 400(300)+5000(0)=40v1+5000v1 v1=2.38m/s v2=0 v2^2=v1^2 + 2gS S=h 0 = 2.38^2 - 2(9.81)(h) h=0.289m My Question: this is the solution of the book. I am just wondering why he used S =h instead of S = d? Isn't "S" suppose to be the actual distance that the object travelled? Please clarify, thanks in advance. Last edited by skipjack; February 5th, 2016 at 04:42 AM. February 4th, 2016, 08:12 PM   #2
Member

Joined: Jun 2013

Posts: 42
Thanks: 0

Please consider this diagram
Attached Images untitled.jpg (10.4 KB, 0 views) February 4th, 2016, 08:25 PM #3 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,690 Thanks: 2669 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra That should be an equation describing conservation of energy (kinetic energy and potential energy), not the distance calculated from Newton's Third Law. February 4th, 2016, 08:28 PM #4 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 21,026 Thanks: 2257 In the original post, the book is misquoted. February 5th, 2016, 02:13 AM #5 Member   Joined: Jun 2013 Posts: 42 Thanks: 0 So the book is wrong? I knew it... so what's the right way of solving for h? I guess it's something like this: v2^2=v1^2 + 2gS S=d 0 = 2.38^2 - 2(9.81)(d) d=0.289m. After I find the length d, I will solve for h using trigonometry? Thanks for reply... in advance.. Last edited by skipjack; February 5th, 2016 at 02:38 AM. February 5th, 2016, 02:37 AM #6 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 21,026 Thanks: 2257 I'm not sure whether the book is wrong, but I doubt that what you posted here is precisely what the book gave, as the arithmetic doesn't work. Thanks from gen_shao February 5th, 2016, 02:43 AM #7 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,690 Thanks: 2669 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra I don't think the book is wrong. They've just decided (slightly oddly) to have the vertical coordinate axis so that $s=0$ at $v=v_2$, the top of the swing. Then $\text{(kinetic energy at bottom)} + \text{(potential energy at bottom)} = \text{(kinetic energy at top)}+\text{(potential energy at top)}$ Thanks from gen_shao Last edited by skipjack; February 5th, 2016 at 04:33 AM. February 5th, 2016, 04:38 AM #8 Global Moderator   Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 21,026 Thanks: 2257 That doesn't explain why the initial arithmetic is incorrect. February 5th, 2016, 05:01 AM #9 Math Team   Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,690 Thanks: 2669 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra Oh, yes, that additional zero on the 40 gram bullet. But the value for $v_1$ is correct. The reuse of variable names is a bit confusing too. February 5th, 2016, 05:11 AM #10 Math Team   Joined: Jul 2011 From: Texas Posts: 3,034 Thanks: 1621 Using $v_2$ as the speed of the bullet/block combination after the collision ... $\frac{1}{2}(M+m)v_2^2=(M+m)gh$ $h=\dfrac{v_2^2}{2g} \approx 0.3 \text{ m}$ The book's solution is correct ... horizontal displacement is not considered since there is no change in gravitational potential energy in that dimension. Thanks from gen_shao Last edited by skipjack; February 6th, 2016 at 12:28 AM. Tags explain, momentum, problem content

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post taylor_1989_2012 Physics 2 December 9th, 2015 11:14 AM SpareLiver Physics 4 May 1st, 2015 01:08 PM pnf123 Calculus 0 April 4th, 2014 09:57 PM Speed Physics 0 March 9th, 2014 01:50 PM johnny Physics 6 February 10th, 2008 08:22 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top      