September 1st, 2012, 08:07 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 579 Thanks: 3  A particle moving in a straight line
A particle moving in a straight line with uinform deceleration has a velocity of 40ms1 at a point P, 20ms1 at a point Q and comes to rest a point R where QR=50, calculate the (i) distance PQ; (ii) time taken to cover PQ (iii) time taken to cover PR. How do about calculating this? 
September 1st, 2012, 08:51 PM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,131 Thanks: 428 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: A particle moving in a sraight line
We are given: where . Let time coincide with the particle being at P, which we will take to be the origin of our coordinate axis x. So, integrating, we have: Integrating again, we find: We are also given: So, we may use this to state: hence: Thus, we have found: (i) distance PQ = 150 m. (ii) time taken to cover PQ = 5 s. (iii) time taken to cover PR = 10 s. 
September 1st, 2012, 11:48 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 579 Thanks: 3  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
But apart from the way you did it, can we use the equations of motion in solving it?

September 1st, 2012, 11:53 PM  #4 
Global Moderator Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,131 Thanks: 428 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
I simply used the calculus (along with the definitions of acceleration as the time rate of change of velocity, and velocity as the time rate of change of displacement) to derive the relevant equations of motion needed to solve the problem. Calculus is not necessary to derive these, but it is computationally simpler. If you are already given equations of motion, then that is simpler still. 
September 2nd, 2012, 12:09 AM  #5 
Global Moderator Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,131 Thanks: 428 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
For example, if we have access to the equations of motion governing uniform acceleration in a straight line, then: we may find the acceleration from: (i) distance PQ: (ii) time take to cover PQ: (iii) time take to cover PR: 
September 2nd, 2012, 12:51 AM  #6 
Senior Member Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 579 Thanks: 3  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
In this problem, which is final and initial velocity and why? I want to know, let me see how I can understand this concept better.

September 2nd, 2012, 12:55 AM  #7 
Global Moderator Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,131 Thanks: 428 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
In the movement from P to Q, 40 m/s is the initial velocity and 20 m/s is the final velocity. In the movement from Q to R, 20 m/s is the initial velocity and 0 m/s is the final velocity. In the movement from P to R, 40 m/s is the initial velocity and 0 m/s is the final velocity. You take the velocity at the initial position and time and that is the initial velocity, likewise the final velocity is the velocity at the final position and time. 
September 2nd, 2012, 04:21 AM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Jan 2012 Posts: 579 Thanks: 3  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
Ok now that the (i) distance PQ is required: the initial velocity u at PQ =20ms1; the final velocity v =0ms1. Using v^2=u^2+2as 0=20^2+2*50a 400=100a a=400/100=4m/s can I veiw that this way; that as the particle is moving in a straight line with a deceleration of 40m/s, by the time it get to Q, it velocity has decrease further to 4m/s? If the initial velocity and final velocity at PQ are 20m/s and 0m/s respectively, why don't we use it to calculate the distance PQ? 
September 5th, 2012, 07:44 AM  #9  
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2011 Posts: 277 Thanks: 1  Re: A particle moving in a straight line Quote:
We could plot a velocitytime graph to represent the motion of the particle. We know that the gradient of a line on a velocitytime graph represents the acceleration/deceleration of the particle and since we're told that the particle decelerates uniformly from point P (with velocity of 40ms1) to point Q (with velocity of 20ms1) then comes to rest at point R. This means we have a straight line that slopes down. [attachment=2c5cclog]MAAS Part1.JPG[/attachmentc5cclog] Given the distance between QR is 50m, but we know we can find the distance between QR by determining the area under velocitytime line, in this case, we have a right triangle here. [attachment=1c5cclog]MAAS Part 2.JPG[/attachmentc5cclog] Distance of QR = Area under the line of velocitytime graph from point Q to point R =Area of the right triangle Solving the equation above for T, we get T=5s We know the gradients of the line PQ and QR are the same (from the fact that the particle moves with uniform deceleration), therefore, we have Obviously, t=5s. Hence, this is the answer the second part of the question, that is, the time taken to cover PQ = t = 5s. And the answer to the third part of the question, time needed to cover PR = (5 + 5)s =10s. Now, let's go back to the first question. We're asked to find the distance between the point P and Q. [attachment=0c5cclog]MAAS Part 3.JPG[/attachmentc5cclog] Distance of PQ = Area under the line of velocitytime graph =Area of the trapezium  
September 5th, 2012, 07:39 PM  #10 
Global Moderator Joined: Jul 2010 From: St. Augustine, FL., U.S.A.'s oldest city Posts: 12,131 Thanks: 428 Math Focus: Calculus/ODEs  Re: A particle moving in a straight line
Nice! This is very well explained and demonstrated graphically in a most straightforward fashion! 

Tags 
line, moving, particle, straight 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
A particle moving around a circle and a point  mathkid  Calculus  9  November 11th, 2012 07:26 PM 
straight line  outsos  Algebra  7  December 23rd, 2010 08:15 PM 
Velocity of a moving particle?  vlamers  Calculus  1  January 27th, 2010 08:12 PM 
straight line Q  Kiranpreet  Algebra  2  August 9th, 2008 09:29 AM 
Particle Moving on a Straight line...  djzero3  Real Analysis  3  October 5th, 2007 04:10 AM 