July 10th, 2015, 02:58 PM  #1 
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24  All Fox are irrationals
e^x, pi+/e, etc... are all irrationals. I can prove that using the trick I've shown several times here to extract the square root with rising precision. I make the square of each unknown value, than I try to find the closest rational square root $\displaystyle (\pi+e)^2 =? K^2$ we know that: $\displaystyle (\pi+e)^2= 34.3381.....$ That is $\displaystyle 5^2 <34.3381... <6^2 $ Since with my complicate modulus 2x1 we have 34.3381...135711=9.3381... and 34.3381...13571113=4.3381 so since no integer solution we go rational using the rational complicate modulus: $\displaystyle Mnk = 2x/K1/K^2 $ We keep K=10 than we see that subtracting from 34.3381 Mnk calculated from x=0,1 to p (2 digit value)we have a value littlest than 34.3381 so a rest, while for p+1 we have a to big value. Than we rise K, f.ex 100 again we find a 3 digit value q littlest than 34.3381 while for q+1 we have a too big value. We are sure our value is irrational since we can prove that we feet it when K goes to infinity. This works for several unproved values. 
July 10th, 2015, 06:04 PM  #2  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,599 Thanks: 2587 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
And then you claim results for values that you don't specify. How is anyone to take this seriously?  
July 10th, 2015, 11:32 PM  #3  
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24  Quote:
Sorry on android typing is very tricky. As example $\displaystyle (\pi  e )^2 = \lim_{k\to\infty} \sum_{x=1/k}^{ p } ( 2x/k +1/k^2) = \int_ {0}^ {\pi  e } 2x dx $ Where p becomes $\displaystyle \pi  e $ just at the limit. I hope it's not a round circle since we know for that fox that the limit exist and is only one. Is the infinite descent I use for Fermat Last edited by complicatemodulus; July 11th, 2015 at 12:08 AM.  
July 11th, 2015, 04:46 AM  #4 
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24 
Forgotten: e^x can be proved irrational just for known x.

July 11th, 2015, 06:24 AM  #5 
Math Team Joined: Jan 2015 From: Alabama Posts: 3,261 Thanks: 896 
What do you mean by "known x"? x= ln(2) is pretty "known" but for that x e^x is clearly not irrational. In fact, what do you mean to begin with by "e^x is irrational"? e^x is a continuous function which, for different x, takes on both rational and irrational numbers. 
July 11th, 2015, 07:20 AM  #6 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  
July 11th, 2015, 10:23 AM  #7  
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24  Quote:
 
July 11th, 2015, 10:50 AM  #8  
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24  Quote:
There is probably a theorem on the rest that cut faster the story after some void turns, but I've to check.  
July 12th, 2015, 12:38 PM  #9 
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24 
The procedure to check unknown irrational NUMBERS is: Knowing that the number you are looking for is not an integer: For example $\displaystyle (\pi + e ) = 5,85987.... $ make the square: $\displaystyle (\pi + e )^2 = 34.33812...$ Knowing the rules for integer square we can make the recorsive difference that gives the square root of each square with rest zero, or a rest if it is not an integer (equal to the sum in the other direction): $\displaystyle 34.33812...=? \sum_{x=1/k}^{ p } ( 2x +1) = $ 34.33812  (1+3+5+7+9) = 34.33812.... 25 = 9,33812... too little 34.33812  (1+3+5+7+9) = 34.33812.... 36 = 1,66187... too big So it's a number between 5^2 and 6^2 We start to look if 34.33812.. has a rational root with 1 digit precision or if: $\displaystyle (\pi + e )^2 = 34.33812.. =? \sum_{x=1/k}^{ p } ( 2x/k +1/k^2) $ With k=10 so we tabulate: x 2x/101/100 Sum 0.1 0.01 0.01 0.2 0.03 0.04 0.3 0.05 0.09 0.4 0.07 0.16 0.5 0.09 0.25 0.6 0.11 0.36 0.7 0.13 0.49 0.8 0.15 0.64 0.9 0.17 0.81 1 0.19 1 1.1 0.21 1.21 1.2 0.23 1.44 1.3 0.25 1.69 1.4 0.27 1.96 1.5 0.29 2.25 1.6 0.31 2.56 1.7 0.33 2.89 1.8 0.35 3.24 1.9 0.37 3.61 2 0.39 4 2.1 0.41 4.41 2.2 0.43 4.84 2.3 0.45 5.29 2.4 0.47 5.76 2.5 0.49 6.25 2.6 0.51 6.76 2.7 0.53 7.29 2.8 0.55 7.84 2.9 0.57 8.41 3 0.59 9 3.1 0.61 9.61 3.2 0.63 10.24 3.3 0.65 10.89 3.4 0.67 11.56 3.5 0.69 12.25 3.6 0.71 12.96 3.7 0.73 13.69 3.8 0.75 14.44 3.9 0.77 15.21 4 0.79 16 4.1 0.81 16.81 4.2 0.83 17.64 4.3 0.85 18.49 4.4 0.87 19.36 4.5 0.89 20.25 4.6 0.91 21.16 4.7 0.93 22.09 4.8 0.95 23.04 4.9 0.97 24.01 5 0.99 25 5.1 1.01 26.01 5.2 1.03 27.04 5.3 1.05 28.09 5.4 1.07 29.16 5.5 1.09 30.25 5.6 1.11 31.36 5.7 1.13 32.49 5.8 1.15 33.64 too little 5.9 1.17 34.81 too big... Now we try k=100 x 2x/1001/10000 Sum 0.01 0.0001 0.0001 0.02 0.0003 0.0004 0.03 0.0005 0.0009 0.04 0.0007 0.0016 0.05 0.0009 0.0025 0.06 0.0011 0.0036 ... 5.82 0.1163 33.8724 5.83 0.1165 33.9889 5.84 0.1167 34.1056 5.85 0.1169 34.2225 too little.. 5.86 0.1171 34.3396 too big ! So we can continue till K> infinity where: $\displaystyle (\pi + e )^2 = \lim_{k\to\infty} \sum_{x=1/k}^{ p } ( 2x/k +1/k^2) = \int_ {0}^ {\pi + e } (2x) dx $ Where the STOPPING POINT becomes exactly $\displaystyle \pi + e $ just at the limit, so $\displaystyle (\pi + e) = $ irrational root of $\displaystyle (\pi + e)^2 $ Why we are sure it is irrational ? Since the limit, if exist (and we prove that exist and is the root $\displaystyle \pi + e $) and is only one. I hope, ...as Dedekind states. In this way we can check many (all?) unknown suspected irrtationals NUMBERS. Waiting for good math opinions. Thanks Ciao Stefano 
July 12th, 2015, 05:18 PM  #10 
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 2,041 Thanks: 815 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff. 
What's p? When you defined your first sum it went from 1/k to p, which is a little weird in itself. But near the bottom of the post you are evidently setting $\displaystyle p = \pi + e$, in which case if k is a rational number: you can't sum 1/k (a rational number) to p (which would then have to also be a rational number.) Your procedure seems to be circular reasoning. Dan 

Tags 
fox, irrationals 
Search tags for this page 
sum 1 3/4 7/16 15/64 31/256.....to infinity,square root 225 square root 0.0025 square root 0.000025,Sum of following series 1 3/4 7/16 15/64 31/256.......to infinity. Solution by easy trick,is root 2.89 rational or irrational prove
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Find four irrationals  shunya  Elementary Math  1  March 20th, 2014 01:46 PM 
Can infinite product/sum of irrationals be rational?  Agno  Number Theory  6  January 30th, 2012 02:11 PM 
irrationals  nikkor180  Real Analysis  1  August 15th, 2011 02:12 PM 
A Continuous surjective function: irrationals > rationals  donkey87  Real Analysis  4  October 31st, 2009 06:40 PM 