My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
June 13th, 2015, 01:25 AM   #1
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

FLT as parametric equation

FLT for n=3 is equal to say:



for

A,B,C,k INTEGERS


It comes from my step sum:



that has always a result in R going to the limits for k->infinity



Some one can help ? Wolframalpha doesen't...

Thanks
complicatemodulus is offline  
 
June 13th, 2015, 09:32 PM   #2
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

I'm very sorry I forgot to present FLT in this more easy (final) way:

Asking if A^n =C^-B^n

is equal to ask if (example for n=3):




Or using, as shown in my old posts, my step sum is equal to ask if:

putting X= k*x



That is easy to prove HAS NO INTEGER SOLUTION since we can prove by computation that the right sum become more close to the left hand sum if werise k.

So we can perform now the INFINITE DESCENT: we can RISE k trying to vanish the difference between this 2 terms

but we can see ( by computation) that we are not able to do so, till we go to the limit for k-> infinity




So JUST now is possible to restore the identity in R (now coming back to the general form of the 2th binomial term):

(1) A^n = $\displaystyle \int_{1}^{A}{ [n*x^{(n-1)}]} dx = \int_{B}^{C}{ [ n(x)^{(n-1)}]} dx = C^n-B^n $


So we have Never a result with k in N or Q. So is not possible to perfectly fit the area of A^n, till k->infinity.

I hope this was right and be (or not) the Infinte descent claimed by Fermat.

What is nice is that this is very simple proof (in case right), and works for any n, since the inthernal term of the sums:

Mn= (x^n-(x-1)^n)

doesen't change the problem (except for n=2 where I already show what happen to the sum).

Also I hope is clear why in the past I call FLT a collection of Dedekind Sections.


For all the same reasons (I found on the way of 7 years long work) this solves also Beal:

A,B,C non coprimes allow to find a K that divide all them, and x,y,z insthead of n, allow to find an integer solution.

I show by graph that this solution is a solution of a linearized system of 3 lines, so there are few possible case for the soution.

For sure a more math solution must be written, and I'm working on.

Still kindly waiting for some good opinion about... (and an AMS answer in case...)

Thanks
Ciao
Stefano

Last edited by complicatemodulus; June 13th, 2015 at 10:01 PM.
complicatemodulus is offline  
June 14th, 2015, 04:58 AM   #3
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

Sorry here removing some refuse (1/k in the first sum):

************************************************** **

Asking if A^n =C^-B^n

is equal to ask if (example for n=3):




Or using, as shown in my old posts, my step sum is equal to ask if:

putting X= k*x



That is easy to prove HAS NO INTEGER SOLUTION since we can prove by computation that the right sum become more close to the left hand sum if werise k.

So we can perform now the INFINITE DESCENT: we can RISE k trying to vanish the difference between this 2 terms

but we can see ( by computation) that we are not able to do so, till we go to the limit for k-> infinity




So JUST now is possible to restore the identity in R (now coming back to the general form of the 2th binomial term):

(1) A^n = $\displaystyle \int_{1}^{A}{ [n*x^{(n-1)}]} dx = \int_{B}^{C}{ [ n(x)^{(n-1)}]} dx = C^n-B^n $


So we have Never a result with k in N or Q. So is not possible to perfectly fit the area of A^n, till k->infinity.

I hope this was right and be (or not) the Infinte descent claimed by Fermat.

What is nice is that this is very simple proof (in case right), and works for any n, since the inthernal term of the sums:

Mn= (x^n-(x-1)^n)

doesen't change the problem (except for n=2 where I already show what happen to the sum).

Also I hope is clear why in the past I call FLT a collection of Dedekind Sections.


For all the same reasons (I found on the way of 7 years long work) this solves also Beal:

A,B,C non coprimes allow to find a K that divide all them, and x,y,z insthead of n, allow to find an integer solution.

I show by graph that this solution is a solution of a linearized system of 3 lines, so there are few possible case for the soution.

For sure a more math solution must be written, and I'm working on.

Still kindly waiting for some good opinion about...

Thanks
Ciao
Stefano
complicatemodulus is offline  
June 14th, 2015, 08:42 AM   #4
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

Quote:
Originally Posted by complicatemodulus View Post
FLT for n=3 is equal to say:



for

A,B,C,k INTEGERS
I forgot to say that this is the reply of wolframalpha when you push in, each my single step sum, step 1/k.

It doesen't recognize the limit for k->infinity, so the integral.
complicatemodulus is offline  
June 14th, 2015, 10:09 AM   #5
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

Still some typing error: (>) where new.

************************************************** **

Asking if

>

is equal to ask if (example for n=3):




Or using, as shown in my old posts, my step sum is equal to ask if:

putting X= k*x



That is easy to prove HAS NO INTEGER SOLUTION since we can prove by computation that the right sum become more close to the left hand sum if werise k.

So we can perform now the INFINITE DESCENT: we can RISE k trying to vanish the difference between this 2 terms

but we can see ( by computation) that we are not able to do so, till we go to the limit for k-> infinity




So JUST now is possible to restore the identity in R (now coming back to the general form of the 2th binomial term):

> (1)


So we have Never a result with k in N or Q. So is not possible to perfectly fit the area of A^n, till k->infinity.

I hope this was right and be (or not) the Infinte descent claimed by Fermat.

What is nice is that this is very simple proof (in case right), and works for any n, since the inthernal term of the sums:



doesen't change the problem (except for n=2 where I already show what happen to the sum).

Also I hope is clear why in the past I call FLT a collection of Dedekind Sections.


For all the same reasons (I found on the way of 7 years long work) this solves also Beal:

A,B,C non coprimes allow to find a K that divide all them, and x,y,z insthead of n, allow to find an integer solution.

I show by graph that this solution is a solution of a linearized system of 3 lines, so there are few possible case for the soution.

For sure a more math solution must be written, and I'm working on.

Still kindly waiting for some good opinion about...

Thanks
Ciao
Stefano
complicatemodulus is offline  
June 15th, 2015, 09:57 PM   #6
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

To make a numerical example use:

n=3

Using the sum of gnomons M3 or M/k to computate C:

M3= 3x^2-3x+1

M3/k= 3x^2/k -3x/k^2 +1/k^3

A=7 ; A^3 = 343

B=10 ; B^3 = 1000

A^3+B^3 = 1343

C=?

Using k=1 to try to find C we have:

x - M3 - SUM - REST
1 1 1
2 7 8
3 19 27
4 37 64
5 61 125
6 91 216
7 127 343
8 169 512
9 217 729
10 271 1000
11 331 1331 12
12 397 1728 -385

At 11 we have rest 12, at 12 we overpass so rest is -385

So 11< C <12

Using K =7 we have:
x - M3/7 - SUM - REST

1 0.142857143 0.002915452 0.002915452
2 0.285714286 0.020408163 0.023323615
3 0.428571429 0.055393586 0.078717201
4 0.571428571 0.10787172 0.186588921
5 0.714285714 0.177842566 0.364431487
6 0.857142857 0.265306122 0.629737609
7 1 0.370262391 1
8 1.142857143 0.49271137 1.49271137
9 1.285714286 0.632653061 2.125364431
10 1.428571429 0.790087464 2.915451895
11 1.571428571 0.965014577 3.880466472
12 1.714285714 1.157434402 5.037900875
13 1.857142857 1.367346939 6.405247813
14 2 1.594752187 8
15 2.142857143 1.839650146 9.839650146
16 2.285714286 2.102040816 11.94169096
17 2.428571429 2.381924198 14.32361516
18 2.571428571 2.679300292 17.00291545
19 2.714285714 2.994169096 19.99708455
20 2.857142857 3.326530612 23.32361516
21 3 3.67638484 27
22 3.142857143 4.043731778 31.04373178
23 3.285714286 4.428571429 35.47230321
24 3.428571429 4.83090379 40.303207
25 3.571428571 5.250728863 45.55393586
26 3.714285714 5.688046647 51.24198251
27 3.857142857 6.142857143 57.38483965
28 4 6.61516035 64
29 4.142857143 7.104956268 71.10495627
30 4.285714286 7.612244898 78.71720117
31 4.428571429 8.137026239 86.85422741
32 4.571428571 8.679300292 95.5335277
33 4.714285714 9.239067055 104.7725948
34 4.857142857 9.816326531 114.5889213
35 5 10.41107872 125
36 5.142857143 11.02332362 136.0233236
37 5.285714286 11.65306122 147.6763848
38 5.428571429 12.30029155 159.9766764
39 5.571428571 12.96501458 172.941691
40 5.714285714 13.64723032 186.5889213
41 5.857142857 14.34693878 200.9358601
42 6 15.06413994 216
43 6.142857143 15.79883382 231.7988338
44 6.285714286 16.55102041 248.3498542
45 6.428571429 17.32069971 265.6705539
46 6.571428571 18.10787172 283.7784257
47 6.714285714 18.91253644 302.6909621
48 6.857142857 19.73469388 322.425656
49 7 20.57434402 343
50 7.142857143 21.43148688 364.4314869
51 7.285714286 22.30612245 386.7376093
52 7.428571429 23.19825073 409.9358601
53 7.571428571 24.10787172 434.0437318
54 7.714285714 25.03498542 459.0787172
55 7.857142857 25.97959184 485.058309
56 8 26.94169096 512
57 8.142857143 27.9212828 539.9212828
58 8.285714286 28.91836735 568.8396501
59 8.428571429 29.93294461 598.7725948
60 8.571428571 30.96501458 629.7376093
61 8.714285714 32.01457726 661.7521866
62 8.857142857 33.08163265 694.8338192
63 9 34.16618076 729
64 9.142857143 35.26822157 764.2682216
65 9.285714286 36.3877551 800.6559767
66 9.428571429 37.52478134 838.180758
67 9.571428571 38.67930029 876.8600583
68 9.714285714 39.85131195 916.7113703
69 9.857142857 41.04081633 957.7521866
70 10 42.24781341 1000
71 10.14285714 43.47230321 1043.472303
72 10.28571429 44.71428571 1088.186589
73 10.42857143 45.97376093 1134.16035
74 10.57142857 47.25072886 1181.411079
75 10.71428571 48.5451895 1229.956268
76 10.85714286 49.85714286 1279.813411
77 11 51.18658892 1331 12
78 11.14285714 52.5335277 1383.533528 -40.5335277

At 11 we have rest 12, at 11.14 we overpass so rest is -40.533...

So 11 < C < 11.14

With k=100

(last few lines) M3/100

x - M3/100 - Sum - REST

1100 11 3.626701 1331 12
1101 11.01 3.633301 1334.633301 8.366699
1102 11.02 3.639907 1338.273208 4.726792
1103 11.03 3.646519 1341.919727 1.080273
1104 11.04 3.653137 1345.572864 -2.572864


At 11.03 we have rest 1.080273, at 11.04 we overpass so rest is -2.572864...

So 11.03 < C < 11.04

And so on till k= infinity where we know by math we have the solution.

Thanks
Ciao
Stefano
complicatemodulus is offline  
June 28th, 2015, 09:21 PM   #7
Banned Camp
 
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

What follow is worng (so NOT equeal to FLT) since comese from an error of Wolframalpha:



If you try type in Wolframalpha the limit:



The correct result is A^3, but it think:



so it say (when):



More in my next post (still if nobody think there is somethink of good in it.
complicatemodulus is offline  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Tags
equation, flt, parametric



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
parametric equation duke1234 Calculus 6 March 6th, 2015 03:48 PM
parametric equation Haejang Calculus 8 May 10th, 2014 07:03 AM
Parametric Equation Raghav C Marthi Algebra 5 April 17th, 2013 08:18 AM
Parametric equation Punch Calculus 18 June 12th, 2012 11:56 PM
d^2y/dx^2 of a parametric equation jho2 Calculus 1 March 6th, 2009 02:38 PM





Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.