May 20th, 2019, 01:36 PM  #31 
Member Joined: Mar 2019 From: california Posts: 67 Thanks: 0 
I figured out how to represent this in terms of the proof. This is to help you understand better. So here's the counter equation. 28^10 + 31 ^10 > 31.24 ^10 ( where 31 is Y +1). 
May 20th, 2019, 09:16 PM  #32  
Member Joined: Aug 2018 From: România Posts: 84 Thanks: 4  Quote:
An idea: Par exemple , if $\displaystyle z^n=x^n+y^n$ with $\displaystyle z>y>x>0$, that it is very easy to prove that there are the relations $\displaystyle z^{nk}<x^{nk}+y^{nk}$ where $\displaystyle k\in \mathbb N$* with $\displaystyle 1\leq k\leq n1$ and so $\displaystyle x,y,z$ are the sides of a triangle having all angles smaller than a right angle. All the best, Integrator Last edited by skipjack; May 23rd, 2019 at 12:02 AM.  
May 20th, 2019, 09:53 PM  #33 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2019 From: iran Posts: 316 Thanks: 14 
@michaelcweir if x^n + y^n = z^n then x^n + (y+1)^n is greater than z^n not z^n + x^n unless we assume that z < y+1 
May 21st, 2019, 10:21 AM  #34 
Member Joined: Mar 2019 From: california Posts: 67 Thanks: 0 
X^n + (y+1)^n IS GREATER THAN X^n +Y^n. 2 is always bigger than 1, according to elementary math. The only assumption is that there are rules for mathematics.
Last edited by skipjack; May 23rd, 2019 at 01:44 PM. 
May 21st, 2019, 11:08 AM  #35 
Senior Member Joined: Mar 2019 From: iran Posts: 316 Thanks: 14 
yes x^n + (y+1)^n > z^n but this can't prove y+1 > z at all

May 22nd, 2019, 02:14 PM  #36 
Member Joined: Mar 2019 From: california Posts: 67 Thanks: 0 
Just saying that doesn't make it so. Where's the proof of whet you say? I provided proof how that statement affects the case for n = 2. I provided an example that Maschke used. (By the way, he has been silent of late.) 3^2 + 4^2 = 5^2. BUT 3^3 + 4^3 = 4.1^3 approximately, not 5^3. So there is agreement between calculation and example. Last edited by skipjack; May 23rd, 2019 at 01:46 PM. 
May 22nd, 2019, 03:45 PM  #37 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,342 Thanks: 731  FLT is not generally an interest of mine. I didn't understand your latest diagram at all but others did so I must be just losing steam altogether on this subject.
Last edited by skipjack; May 23rd, 2019 at 01:47 PM. 
May 23rd, 2019, 01:12 PM  #38 
Math Team Joined: Oct 2011 From: Ottawa Ontario, Canada Posts: 14,597 Thanks: 1038 
Hey ya'll, you let Mister Weir lose his time the way he wants to, hear?!


Tags 
easy, fermat, proof, theorem 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Fermat's theorem. Proof by 2 operations  victorsorokin  Number Theory  9  April 19th, 2018 05:31 PM 
New proof for Fermat's little theorem  moussaid521  Number Theory  1  December 18th, 2016 09:02 PM 
Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem  mathsman1  Math  14  July 9th, 2016 05:45 PM 
Fermat's last theorem proof  MrAwojobi  Number Theory  20  June 16th, 2014 08:32 PM 
6 Step Fermat's Last Theorem Proof  jhon13  Algebra  4  May 24th, 2012 08:26 AM 