My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum


Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
May 29th, 2018, 04:48 AM   #1
Senior Member
 
Joined: Nov 2011

Posts: 197
Thanks: 2

bijection function

How I prove this statement:
bijection f : f(rational) -> f(positive rational)?
Or how bijection function is a function of rational numbers to positive rational numbers?
to prove by:
Arithmetic of powers[of the functions]
and not by:
Schröder–Bernstein theorem

Last edited by shaharhada; May 29th, 2018 at 04:52 AM.
shaharhada is offline  
 
May 29th, 2018, 07:20 AM   #2
Math Team
 
Joined: Jan 2015
From: Alabama

Posts: 3,183
Thanks: 870

To prove what statement?

"bijection f : f(rational) -> f(positive rational)?" simply introduces a function, f. What do you want to prove about such a function? Do you want to prove such function exists? Do you just want to find an example? The rational numbers are countable. That is, we can order the set of all rational numbers. say $\displaystyle a_1, a_2, a_3\cdot\cdot\cdot$, and order the set of all positive rational numbers, sat $\displaystyle b_1, b_2, b_3, \cdot\cdot\cdot$. Map $\displaystyle a_i$ to $\displaystyle b_i$.
Country Boy is offline  
May 29th, 2018, 08:29 AM   #3
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2017
From: United Kingdom

Posts: 196
Thanks: 59

Math Focus: Algebraic Number Theory, Arithmetic Geometry
Quote:
Originally Posted by Country Boy View Post
The rational numbers are countable. That is, we can order the set of all rational numbers.
Not quite. For example, the set of real numbers is naturally ordered but is not countable. Countable actually means "can be put in bijection with the naturals", which is much, much stronger than "can be ordered". In fact, "can be ordered" says nothing at all - any set can be ordered or even well-ordered. (This is at least true in ZFC. You certainly need choice to be able to well-order all sets, but you don't quite need it just to order them. It's sufficient for this, anyway.)
cjem is offline  
May 29th, 2018, 12:54 PM   #4
Senior Member
 
Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 1,919
Thanks: 533

I think I see an explicit bijection between the rationals and the positive rationals. You just take the standard snaking diagonals argument but extend the rows and columns infinitely in both directions. So you have basically the integer lattice in the plane.

Now you start at the origin and you run the standard snake in the positive direction, and also a mirror snake in the negative direction. Then the algorithm is to go back and forth alternating between the positive and the negative snakes. In this way we can enumerate all the rationals, not just the positive ones. Then you can just pair up the n-th term of the double snake with the n-th term of the standard (positive) snake and you have an explicit bijection.

I'm sure an enterprising individual could work out the explicit formula for the n-th term, by extending the idea of the Cantor pairing function.

And "Today I Learned" that it's a theorem that this is the only quadratic pairing function; and that it's an open question as to whether this is the only polynomial pairing functions. Now that's interesting!

Last edited by Maschke; May 29th, 2018 at 12:57 PM.
Maschke is online now  
Reply

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Tags
bijection, function



Thread Tools
Display Modes


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a bijection from R^n to R? Magnitude Topology 1 September 14th, 2017 01:09 AM
p-q bijection Elwardi Calculus 1 July 8th, 2016 04:39 AM
show that the function f is bijection zodiacbrave Applied Math 1 February 23rd, 2012 08:02 PM
Bijection rebecca Applied Math 2 January 21st, 2010 07:23 AM
bijection fakie6623 Abstract Algebra 3 October 17th, 2007 09:51 PM





Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.