
Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
November 8th, 2018, 12:16 PM  #11 
Newbie Joined: May 2018 From: NYC Posts: 10 Thanks: 0 
I have published my paper now: https://arxiv.org/abs/1810.07877 The manuscript is not tailored for publication, so I've seen some people/reviewers become frustrated for not understanding the argumentation, but mostly due to their own incompetence. Others have found the text to be pretty understandable though. The proof of the limits wasn't presented with rigor, but that was pointed out in the text, that's how Mathematics is done anyway (and if you disagree with me, you probably wouldn't disagree with Alon Amit). Since I didn't write the manuscript with publication in mind, I made it simple and sort of monotonous, the intent now is just to make the new results known, it's unlikely it's fit for publication as is. It's about the novelty, it's not about the presentation. The contents of this paper present formulae for the harmonic numbers of any order, for the partial sums of two Fourier series which include them, and as a consequence, a new proof for the Basel problem, as well as a proof for the closedforms of $\displaystyle \zeta(2k)$, integer $\displaystyle k>=1$. It also has new integral representations for $\displaystyle \zeta(2k+1)$, which appear in the formulas of $\displaystyle H_{2k+1}(n)$. Assuming the closedforms of $\displaystyle \zeta(2k)$, we are led to conclude the limits of the integrals that appear on $\displaystyle H_{2k}(n)$, and viceversa. I am now thinking whether it's possible to extend the reasoning employed for the harmonic numbers to any harmonic progression, in principle it should be. Last edited by jrsousa2; November 8th, 2018 at 12:20 PM. 
November 8th, 2018, 12:29 PM  #12 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,215 Thanks: 658  
November 8th, 2018, 12:33 PM  #13 
Newbie Joined: May 2018 From: NYC Posts: 10 Thanks: 0  
November 8th, 2018, 01:00 PM  #14 
Newbie Joined: May 2018 From: NYC Posts: 10 Thanks: 0  Btw, let me place the final results here as a shortcut
One of the three possible formulas for the harmonic numbers is: $\displaystyle \sum_{k=1}^{n}\frac{1}{k}=\frac{1}{2n}+\pi\int_{0} ^{1} (1u)\cot{\pi u}\left(1\cos{2\pi n u}\right)\,du$ But more generally, for the odd powers we get: $\displaystyle H_{2k+1}(n)=\frac{1}{2n^{2k+1}}\frac{(1)^{k}(2\pi)^{2k+1}}{2}\int_{0}^{1}\sum_{j=0}^{k} \frac{B_{2k2j}\left(22^{2k2j}\right)}{(2k2j)!(2j+1)!}u^{2j+1}f(u,n)\,du$ where $\displaystyle f(u,n)=\cot{\pi u}\left[1\cos{2\pi n(1u)}\right]$. 
November 21st, 2018, 04:42 PM  #15 
Newbie Joined: May 2018 From: NYC Posts: 10 Thanks: 0  Formula for Harmonic Progression
As I imagined, it's really possible to apply the same reasoning in my paper to get the sum of the Harmonic Progression. Given $a$ and $b$ integer numbers: $\sum _{k=1}^n \frac{1}{(a k+b)}=\frac{1}{2b}+\frac{1}{2(a n+b)}+\int _0^1 2\pi u\sin{[a n\pi(1u)]}\sin{[\pi(1u)(a n+2b)]}\cot{[a\pi(1u)]}du$ 

Tags 
elegant, formula, harmonic, harmonic numbers, number theory, numbers, order, riemann, zeta 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
formula to determine note and octave from harmonic and fundamental?  Node  New Users  1  August 7th, 2017 10:43 PM 
more elegant way for gcd(m^k,n^k)=gcd^k(m,n)  elim  Number Theory  2  October 4th, 2015 03:53 AM 
How to transform this propositional formula to one in firstorder logic  Ganesh Ujwal  Calculus  0  December 10th, 2014 06:44 PM 
Harmonic Numbers  667  Number Theory  8  October 24th, 2013 05:19 AM 
Higher order derivatives and taylor formula  thescratchy  Calculus  1  March 4th, 2011 04:19 PM 