April 15th, 2018, 01:08 PM  #11 
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3  0....but you do not have 0 rectangles do you...well you may...but 0 rectangles does not exist.....it is only that you do not have it...you must always have something..so when I have a 0 rectangles.....the answer is undefined...as the absences of rectangles does not exist.... Further saying that my rectangles of 0 is undefined is equivalent to saying my rectangle is 0.....my answer of "undefined" still works for the expression of 0 length multiplied by 0 width... the difference you argue between 0 * 0 = undefined 0 * 0 = 0 is meaningless... Last edited by Conway51; April 15th, 2018 at 01:11 PM. 
April 15th, 2018, 01:17 PM  #12 
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3 
To any concerned Since the inability to define operations of zero by zero seems to be an issue...allow the following edit to the op.... All zero's must be accounted for..... operations of 0 by 0 are not expressible as a sum 0 + 0 = 0 + 0 0 * 0 * 0 = 0 * 0 * 0 0/0 = 0/0 negative element of zero or otherwise......extend this thought to operations involving varying amounts of zero inside parenthesis..... The length of a rectangle of 0 multiplied by the width of a rectangle 0 equlas 0 * 0 Last edited by Conway51; April 15th, 2018 at 01:21 PM. 
April 15th, 2018, 01:24 PM  #13  
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 695 Thanks: 232  Quote:
So the area is area=width*length. So 0=0*0 as you just agreed to. Thanks.  
April 15th, 2018, 01:26 PM  #14  
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3  Quote:
so...if post #12 by me nullifies your previous argument....would you offer another?  
April 15th, 2018, 01:28 PM  #15 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 695 Thanks: 232  
April 15th, 2018, 01:30 PM  #16  
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3  Quote:
And to be fare...none of us can "have" a rectangle with the dimension you described..... therefore...the operation is undefined...or defined as 0 * 0... and expression you agreed with....  
April 15th, 2018, 01:32 PM  #17 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 695 Thanks: 232  
April 15th, 2018, 01:33 PM  #18 
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3  no where in that post was there a rectangle.... proof......is in the dimensions....or the pudding if you will......lol you can say you have an empty set...or an empty vector...as well as an operation..but you do not have a rectangle..... 
April 15th, 2018, 01:35 PM  #19 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2009 Posts: 695 Thanks: 232 
But fine, let's take some more examples. Let's take some good old sixsided dices, one red, and one green. The probability of coming up with a 7 is 0 of course, since the dice have sides zero. The multiplication rule of probability said that in independent events $$\text{Prob}(A ~\text{and}~B) = \text{Prob}(A) \text{Prob}(B)$$ So the probability of coming up with a 7 on the red dice AND on the green dice, is the probablity of coming up with a 7 on the red multiplies with the probability of coming up with a 7 on the green. Hence 0=0*0. 
April 15th, 2018, 01:38 PM  #20  
Banned Camp Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 153 Thanks: 3  Quote:
on a side note....what is the difference between 0 and undefined as the sum......?....lol  

Tags 
numerical, superposition, superpostion 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Superposition of waves  LUPhysics  Trigonometry  1  May 9th, 2016 03:38 PM 
antimatter by superposition of light  BenFRayfield  Physics  1  April 13th, 2015 06:37 AM 
Superposition flames  Kinroh  Physics  2  March 2nd, 2015 06:34 AM 
Differential equations/Princ. of superposition?  zibb3r  Differential Equations  2  September 14th, 2013 12:45 PM 
differential equations  superposition principle  mbradar2  Differential Equations  2  December 15th, 2010 07:02 AM 