My Math Forum A Novel attempt to find a simple proof of F.L.T

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 March 5th, 2018, 06:34 PM #11 Senior Member   Joined: May 2016 From: USA Posts: 1,310 Thanks: 551 Admittedly off topic. I have long wondered what attracts people to things like Fermat's Last Theorem. Part, I suspect, is an unwarranted intuition that things easy to express are easy to prove. Part is a simple desire to solve a puzzle; I have to believe that desire motivated Wiles and the many skilled mathematicians who had sought a proof before him. And for many decades, I am confident that people did not understand the actual complexity of the problem. Now that a proof has been found and the complexities involved in finding a proof have been delineated, the continuing interest baffles me. "Wiles found a proof and x years later I did too" seems a rather puerile goal. Or am I missing something?
 March 19th, 2018, 06:31 AM #12 Member   Joined: Aug 2015 From: Chiddingfold, Surrey Posts: 57 Thanks: 3 Math Focus: Number theory, Applied maths See below for interesting results of further extensive research. Comments welcome. ODD POWERS AND FLT. Although it is known that Fermatâ€™s last theorem is true for all powers higher than two, an attempt to disprove this with odd powers, might be to show that there is at least one set of three integers A>B>C where all of the following statements are true :- 1. An MOD (B +C) =0 2. Bn MOD (A-C) = 0 3. CnMod(A-B) = 0 4. (Bn+Cn) MOD A =0 5. (An-Bn) MOD C= 0 6. (An -Cn) MOD B = 0 7. A, B & C all different 8. A, B & C relatively prime 9. A.B.C MOD 2 =0 10. When 2n+1 is prime then A.B.C MOD (2n +1) = 0 (Sophie Germain, but under Nom de plume until 1807) 11. A,B.C not in arithmetical progression (Bottari (1907), Goldziher (1913), Milhajinee (1952), Rameswar Rao (1969) Alternatively if it can be shown that for all possible sets of A,B & C, at least one of these statements cannot be true, then we would have a new proof of the theorem. However a comprehensive computer aided examination of all 35,820,200 possible sets of A,B & C from 3,2,1 to 600,699,698 and powers from 3 to 21 have shown that all the above statements are true in the number of triads as follows:- Power 3 20,522 Power 5 13,659 Powers 7, 11, 17, 19 54,749 (not statement 10) Power 9 8,245 Power 11 6,892 Power 15 5,207 Power 21 3,702 (The sets of triads where 2p+1 is not prime are identical , and of which, the others subsets.) For comparison the number or primitive Pythagoras triples up to A,B, C = 593,465,368 is only 95. When all statements other than 1 are true, (statement 11 with A,B,C = 5,4,3) So how can that be since FLT is true? The answer is that there is one more statement that is true which confirms that FLT is true (Apart from A^n - B^n - C^n >< 0). I leave it to the reader to discover that other statement. Clue : check ONE more odd prime power. Last edited by magicterry; March 19th, 2018 at 06:38 AM. Reason: update
March 19th, 2018, 02:16 PM   #13
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2010

Posts: 706
Thanks: 140

Quote:
 Originally Posted by magicterry For comparison the number of primitive Pythagoras triples up to A,B, C = 593,465,368 is only 95.
Am I reading this correctly? You are saying that there are only 95 primitive Pythagorean triples with hypotenuse $\displaystyle \leq$ 593,465,368?

March 19th, 2018, 02:45 PM   #14
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2015
From: USA

Posts: 2,430
Thanks: 1315

Quote:
 Originally Posted by SDK in the hopes it penetrates the crazy.
I think the 2016 election demonstrated that "the crazy" is weaker only than adamantium and thus is virtually impenetrable.

March 19th, 2018, 03:21 PM   #15
Senior Member

Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,310
Thanks: 706

Quote:
 Originally Posted by romsek I think the 2016 election demonstrated that "the crazy" is weaker only than adamantium and thus is virtually impenetrable.
I had to look that up. Adamantium is "a fictional metal alloy appearing in American comic books published by Marvel Comics. It is best known as the substance bonded to the character Wolverine's skeleton and claws."

Today I learned!

What do you think is crazy? That Trump became president? Or that the only viable options available to the American people were Trump and Hillary? Or that the DNC rigged its own process to nominate the only person in the country who could manage to lose to Trump? I'd go with all of the above.

 Tags attempt, find, flt, proof, simple

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post relaxursoul Number Theory 0 November 14th, 2017 12:20 PM tejolson Real Analysis 1 March 17th, 2013 07:54 PM Math4dummy Calculus 3 February 22nd, 2012 08:56 PM Riazy Calculus 2 January 21st, 2011 08:45 AM Riazy Calculus 1 January 15th, 2011 05:23 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top