My Math Forum (http://mymathforum.com/math-forums.php)
-   Number Theory (http://mymathforum.com/number-theory/)
-   -   Relative Mathematics (http://mymathforum.com/number-theory/343017-relative-mathematics.html)

 Conway51 December 6th, 2017 10:39 AM

Relative Mathematics

In every R there exists an integer zero element ( -0 )
( -0 ) =/= 0
|0| = |(-0)|
( -0 ) : possesses the additive identity property
( -0 ) : does not possess the multiplication property of 0
( -0 ) : possesses the multiplicative identity property of 1
The zero elements ( 0 ) and ( -0 ) in an expression of division can only exist as: (0)/( -0 )

0 + ( -0 ) = 0 = ( -0 ) + 0
( -0 ) + ( -0 ) = 0
1 + ( -0 ) = 1 = ( -0 ) + 1

0 * ( -0 ) = 0 = ( -0 ) * 0
1 * ( -0 ) = 1 = ( -0 ) * 1
n * ( -0 ) = n = ( -0 ) * n

Therefore, the zero element ( -0 ) is by definition also the multiplicative inverse of 1 .

And as division by the zero elements requires ( - 0 ) as the divisor ( x / ( -0 )) is defined as the quotient ( x ) .

0 / n = 0
0 / ( -0 ) = 0
n / ( -0 ) = n

0 / 1 = 0
1 / ( -0 ) = 1
1 / 1 = 1

( 1/( -0 ) = 1 )

The reciprocal of ( -0 ) is defined as 1/( -0 )

1/(-0) * ( -0 ) = 1

(-0)^(-1) = ( 1/( -0 ) = 1

(-0)(-0)^(-1) = 1 = ( -0 )^(-1)

Any element raised to ( -1 ) equals that elements inverse.

0^0 = undefined
0^(-0) = undefined
1^0 = 1
1^(-0) = 1

Therefore, all expressions of ( -0 ) or ( 0 ) as exponents or as logarithms are required to exist without change.
Therefore, division by zero is defined.
Therefore, the product of multiplication by zero is relative to which integer zero is used in the binary expression of multiplication.

Transitivity is not applicable to the additive identity elements.

 v8archie December 6th, 2017 11:06 AM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Conway51 (Post 585365) Transitivity is not applicable to the additive identity elements.
This sentence still doesn't make sense.

And yet again you fail to answer the point that I made. http://mymathforum.com/number-theory...tml#post585359

 Conway51 December 6th, 2017 12:09 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie (Post 585370) This sentence still doesn't make sense. And yet again you fail to answer the point that I made. http://mymathforum.com/number-theory...tml#post585359
Thank you for your time...I will consider all you have shared carefully.

As I disagree with you on both accounts. Nothing further is needed between us.

 Joppy December 6th, 2017 12:37 PM

Hey.. Déjà vu

 Conway51 December 6th, 2017 12:50 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Joppy (Post 585377) Hey.. Déjà vu
It is not appropriate of you to make comments not on topic.

Do you have a point?

I would listen to all you share carefully just as I did with v8archie......further if I cared I could provide links to other forums with this...where people agree his point is "pointless"...I will not do so...I will move on....perhaps you should do the same...in whatever direction that takes you...

but passive aggressive replies are not the answer.

 v8archie December 6th, 2017 12:55 PM

Ah, we're not attempting to do mathematics any more. This is all make-believe.

 studiot December 6th, 2017 01:19 PM

Quote:
 further if I cared I could provide links to other forums with this...where people agree his point is "pointless"
Yes I see you got a second response in this forum 8 minutes ago, given that your scattergun seeded that forum as the same time as your previous thread here which garnered 47 replies to add to the 7 in this thread.

Is this a new number ? - Mathematics - Science Forums

 Conway51 December 6th, 2017 01:20 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie (Post 585380) Ah, we're not attempting to do mathematics any more. This is all make-believe.
I am fine with make believe mathematics. If you do not wish to participate...that if fine....however...you should leave me be.

Please note I stated for all in this thread "A New Relative Mathematics"

"That this is a exercise in theory. And nothing more"

Perhaps in light of this you should give me a break.

 Conway51 December 6th, 2017 01:44 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by studiot (Post 585382) Yes I see you got a second response in this forum 8 minutes ago, given that your scattergun seeded that forum as the same time as your previous thread here which garnered 47 replies to add to the 7 in this thread. Is this a new number ? - Mathematics - Science Forums
Lol....this is on exactly 27 forums buddy....keep looking....then stop replying unless you have something to add/suggest or change....

 studiot December 6th, 2017 02:00 PM

Quote:
 Originally Posted by Conway51 (Post 585388) Lol....this is on exactly 27 forums buddy....keep looking....then stop replying unless you have something to add/suggest or change....
So how many people exactly are you bothering in total?

All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:12 AM.