My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

Thanks Tree3Thanks
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
October 1st, 2017, 08:31 PM   #11
Senior Member
Joined: Sep 2016
From: USA

Posts: 395
Thanks: 211

Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics
What you are asking for is equivalent to defining area to be a linear function of the side length. The answer has nothing to do with units. It is simply due to the fact that our definition of area depends quadratically on the side length. Thus when you make a linear change of variables (such as a change in unit), you necessarily get a nonlinear change in the area.

As you stated, a post-it note doesn't know or care about our arbitrary choices for units. However, the fact that area is a nonlinear function of side length is based completely in reality. It can't be overcome without redefining what area means which would result in a useless definition (albeit with nice properties).
Thanks from Joppy
SDK is offline  
October 1st, 2017, 11:35 PM   #12
Joined: Nov 2015
From: USA

Posts: 96
Thanks: 6

Why must it be useless? Is there some reason you are certain that it would be useless?

Last edited by skipjack; October 2nd, 2017 at 04:15 AM.
MystMage is offline  
October 2nd, 2017, 12:32 AM   #13
Senior Member
Joined: Jun 2015
From: England

Posts: 830
Thanks: 244

They used to teach a whole theory of the use of these ratios and other relationships to Engineers studying engineering management under the guise of engineering economics.
Engineering economics is quite different from that airy fairy nonsense subject of similar name that leads to inept politicians and worse.
studiot is offline  
October 2nd, 2017, 04:08 AM   #14
Math Team
Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,327
Thanks: 2451

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
This is not how science works.

You have decided what you want the answer to be and are now searching for evidence to support you. That is how religion works and, perhaps, politics.

Science observes, makes hypotheses, tests them against reality, and then discards hypotheses that don't match reality.

If you try building squares from "unit squares" you will see why the ratio of area to edge cannot be constant.
Thanks from Joppy
v8archie is offline  
October 2nd, 2017, 05:45 AM   #15
Senior Member
Joined: May 2016
From: USA

Posts: 1,047
Thanks: 430

Kasner and Newman's Mathematics and the Imagination has a relevant essay by Gasking. His position is that how we elect to count and measure is arbitrary, but how we actually do count and measure is determined by what leads to the simplest physics. What makes the essay particularly relevant is that at least one of Gaskings's examples utilizes rulers and square tiles for the practical purpose of tiling a square room.

So the OP can realize his ambition (perhaps just by pondering Gasking's essay) but will have to redo all of physics as a result.
Thanks from Joppy
JeffM1 is offline  
October 2nd, 2017, 07:43 AM   #16
Senior Member
Joined: Mar 2015
From: New Jersey

Posts: 1,390
Thanks: 100

if Edge of post-it note is 2in x 2in, Area is 4in$\displaystyle ^{2}$ and A/E =2.
if Edge of post-it note is (1/6)ft x (1/6)ft, Area is (1/36)ft$\displaystyle ^{2}$ and A/ E =1/6.

The problem is you can't ignore units. Distances and areas are not pure numbers.
A/E=4in$\displaystyle ^{2}$/2in=2in
A/E=(1/36)ft^{2}/(1/6)ft=(1/6)ft. But (1/6)ft=(1/6)ft x 12in/ft=2in.

A/E is the same no matter what units you use, as long as you convert to the same unit.

A is ab by definition, derived by adding little squares.

Number theory? Elementary algebra and geometry.
zylo is offline  
October 8th, 2017, 02:43 AM   #17
Joined: Nov 2015
From: USA

Posts: 96
Thanks: 6

You assume that the area must be measured with little units of shape.

I'm not looking for evidence to support what I want to believe, rather I want to achieve a result (geometry describing math without units) and am looking to find a reliable method of achieving that result.

I have since realized though, that I was asking the wrong question, a question that limited the potential solution space (much like how using formulas for flat 2d geometry will fail when used on the surface of a sphere).

My original thought was to compare a single edge to total area, but any possible solutions would only work for squares. So then I thought about trying to use perimeter which applies to all shapes, but not only can that be very misleading, but some shapes, particularly fractals or shapes with disjointed edges (donuts), end up getting wonky results, from a conceptual point of view at least.

So I then realized a better and more useful method is to use the circumcircle. The area is then the ratio of area of the shape to the area of the circumcircle.
MystMage is offline  

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

area, conundrum, interesting, line, ratios

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Straight line from vertex bisects area of triangle matisolla Geometry 1 April 7th, 2015 12:58 PM
Finding a value for which the area enclosed by a curve and line is at a minimum ImaginaryHeart Calculus 5 October 29th, 2014 04:38 AM
Probability conundrum floodric Probability and Statistics 4 February 24th, 2014 10:01 AM
Area bounded by a curve and arbitrary line PhizKid Calculus 3 February 17th, 2013 09:08 AM
A conundrum.... random_thinker Applied Math 2 June 25th, 2009 04:41 AM

Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.