April 7th, 2017, 11:50 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,101 Thanks: 40  Riemann Hypothesis proven by physicists 
April 7th, 2017, 12:29 PM  #2 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,778 Thanks: 2195 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
A more accurate title would be "Riemann Hypothesis not proven by physicists".

April 7th, 2017, 12:33 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: CA Posts: 1,238 Thanks: 637  
April 7th, 2017, 02:11 PM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,101 Thanks: 40  
April 7th, 2017, 02:15 PM  #5 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,101 Thanks: 40 
The elementary proof is yet to come soon Only new concepts will get rid of all the hardest problems. 
April 9th, 2017, 10:40 AM  #6 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,370 Thanks: 321 
No breakthrough. Circular logic. Peter Woit at Not Even Wrong has a good writeup. Some Math and Physics Interactions  Not Even Wrong 
April 9th, 2017, 10:44 AM  #7 
Member Joined: Aug 2016 From: Used to be Earth Posts: 64 Thanks: 14 
Why put the title "Riemann Hypothesis proven by physicists" when it's clearly not the case?

April 9th, 2017, 10:54 AM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,101 Thanks: 40 
The only smart to push to red the article is to tell you that it was proven. If I wrote Riemann Hypothesis not yet proven then no one will dare to read it. Anyway my feeling is that many hard mathematical problems will be solved by non mathematician people (biology, physics, medicine, or any other fields) or even amateurs. Solve the set of problems I had sent today. It is linked to RH. 
April 9th, 2017, 10:55 AM  #9  
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,101 Thanks: 40  Quote:
 
April 9th, 2017, 10:58 AM  #10 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 1,370 Thanks: 321  Uh ... sorry. What?? Internet users are still commenting on Cantor's diagonal argument. Will that ever be finished? This is the first time iI've ever seen anyone make the claim that an article someone wrote is not finished as long as Internet commenters are still posting. I must really have misunderstood you. Can you elaborate? You deliberately misstated the conclusion to get clicks? Am I the only one not getting paid by the click around here? Moderators, where's my check? Last edited by Maschke; April 9th, 2017 at 11:01 AM. 

Tags 
hypothesis, physicists, proven, riemann 
Search tags for this page 
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help with Riemann's Hypothesis  robinlrandall  New Users  2  August 23rd, 2014 03:10 PM 
Is Riemanns hypothesis proven wrong?  Semjase  Number Theory  36  August 23rd, 2014 12:59 PM 
Riemann Hypothesis.  mathbalarka  Number Theory  0  October 31st, 2013 12:54 AM 
Do you believe the Riemann hypothesis?  Eureka  Number Theory  1  September 12th, 2011 01:07 PM 
The Riemann Hypothesis and what it say  MyNameIsVu  Complex Analysis  2  April 16th, 2009 07:51 AM 