User Name Remember Me? Password

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 March 31st, 2017, 01:26 PM #1 Newbie   Joined: May 2016 From: Pretoria Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Fermat's last theorem FERMAT’S LAST THEOREM an + bn = cn No three positive integers a, b and c satisfy the equation for value of n greater than 2 21power3 + 35power3 = 44power3 9261 + 42875 = 85184 Divide by 90 9261/90 42875/90 85184/90 equals 102.90 476.38 946.48 Round to 103 476 946 Times 90 103*90 476*90 946*90 Equals 9270 42840 85140 9261 42875 85184 Minus big from small ( stay within 1 to 45 ) 9 + 35 = 44 44 = 44 Lourie 31 March 2017 March 31st, 2017, 01:48 PM   #2
Math Team

Joined: May 2013
From: The Astral plane

Posts: 2,273
Thanks: 943

Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lourie FERMAT’S LAST THEOREM an + bn = cn No three positive integers a, b and c satisfy the equation for value of n greater than 2 21power3 + 35power3 = 44power3 9261 + 42875 = 85184 Divide by 90 9261/90 42875/90 85184/90 equals 102.90 476.38 946.48 Round to 103 476 946 Times 90 103*90 476*90 946*90 Equals 9270 42840 85140 9261 42875 85184 Minus big from small ( stay within 1 to 45 ) 9 + 35 = 44 44 = 44 Lourie 31 March 2017
$\displaystyle 21^3 + 35^3 - 44^3 = -33048$
Try again.

-Dan

Last edited by topsquark; March 31st, 2017 at 01:50 PM. April 1st, 2017, 12:04 AM #3 Newbie   Joined: May 2016 From: Pretoria Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Let us put it this way. No three positive integers a,b, and c satisfy the equation of [ an+bn=cn ] for value of n bigger than 2. meaning: an + bn can not equal cn according to the theorem? Last edited by Lourie; April 1st, 2017 at 12:27 AM. April 1st, 2017, 12:37 AM   #4
Senior Member

Joined: Feb 2016
From: Australia

Posts: 1,838
Thanks: 653

Math Focus: Yet to find out.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Lourie Let us put it this way. No three positive integers a,b, and c satisfy the equation of [ an+bn=cn ] for value of n bigger than 2. meaning: an + bn can not equal cn according to the theorem?
That is what Andrew Wiles et. al proved to be true, yes. Tags fermat, theorem ### Fermat theorem forums 2017

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Show Printable Version Email this Page Display Modes Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post CreativeArbok Math 3 September 10th, 2014 12:58 PM McPogor Number Theory 5 December 7th, 2013 07:28 PM mente oscura Number Theory 10 June 6th, 2013 08:33 PM rnck Number Theory 9 August 24th, 2011 04:58 AM smslca Number Theory 4 September 14th, 2010 08:00 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top      