My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

Thanks Tree2Thanks
  • 2 Post By Maschke
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
March 25th, 2017, 08:30 PM   #1
Joined: Mar 2017
From: Atlanta

Posts: 2
Thanks: 0

Lightbulb Theory: The Shadows of Prime Numbers

Prime numbers are the elemental building blocks that determine the composite numbers, and they famously divide the number line into random increments in a fashion that has baffled mathematicians for centuries. There is an interesting related phenomenon, however, that we can understand. You can categorize sets of multiple primes within the boundaries of two smaller consecutive primes squared, thereby projecting these smaller primes onto larger segments of numbers farther down the number line in a meaningful way. I am calling this effect a shadow. Take all of the primes between 25 and 49 as an example. 29, 31, 37, 41, 43, and 47. Their pattern may not be known, but these are the gaps in the unique shadow produced by projecting 5 squared and 7 squared in which all of the composite numbers in between are uniquely generated from all of the preceding primes up to and including the smaller of the two primes we are squaring to produce the entire space of the shadow. In the case of the shadow between 25 and 49, every composite number can be produced by the formulas 2x, 3x, and 5x with x being all positive integers extending out to infinity. The second we reach 49, we need to use a higher layer of composite numbers to begin producing some of the composites which appear. So, we add a 7x to our list of composite numbers by smallest factor, but we never need to do this until we reach the square of the next prime number at which point the previous shadow changes to a unique new shadow. We can generate all of the composite numbers from 49 up to 121 with the formula layers so far introduced including 7x, but when we get to 121 (11 squared) we need to begin including 11x in our smallest prime factors list to cover all of the composite numbers in the shadow. So the squares of prime numbers present us with real boundaries that extend up the number line, covering larger increments that each contain more prime numbers. By looking at just the composite numbers, we simplify the primes to the gaps between these numbers, the light in the shadows, with these shadow numbers generated from much simpler elements. In this way, the numbers can be thought of as unfolding in groups of numbers which are then projected to the unfolding of larger groups of numbers. These groups are bounded by the squares of each consecutive prime, and their makeup is foreshadowed much earlier than when they appear.
helloandlullaby is offline  
March 25th, 2017, 10:15 PM   #2
Senior Member
Joined: Aug 2012

Posts: 2,426
Thanks: 759

If you break this into paragraphs this will be much more readable. See if you can write out a clear mathematical exposition.
Thanks from topsquark and Joppy
Maschke is offline  
March 27th, 2017, 02:42 AM   #3
Joined: May 2016
From: Pretoria

Posts: 7
Thanks: 0

Number Theory - 42 and 27

I came onto the following:
Draw a column and number it from 1 to 360 from top to bottom.
In a column next to it use numbers 1 to 360 as a constant.
Count 1 Constant 27
Count 2 Constant 27
Count 3 Constant 27
Count 4 Constant 27
Count .... Constant 27
Count .... Constant 27
Count 42 Constant 27
OK: 42 27 are the only numbers that has the following YAN properties:
( Excl: 78 87 and 69 9 )
[42 plus 27 = 69] [ 69 plus 96 =165 ]
[ 165 minus 66 = 99 / 165 minus 99 = 66 ]
Euclid: - x2 plus x plus 41 = prime number except i think 40
Could it be that his method meant: x2 plus x minus 1 plus 42 = prime number?
Pyramid Giza:Edge to base = 42 degrees angle / Edge to edge at top 96 degrees angle - once the edge lines are completed / the apex had never been build.
Lourie is offline  

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

numbers, prime, shadows, theory

Search tags for this page
Click on a term to search for related topics.
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Prime numbers and irrational numbers Pengkuan Math 61 February 29th, 2016 05:46 PM
prime numbers and composite numbers shaimaa saif Algebra 10 November 17th, 2015 09:02 AM
The paradox between prime numbers and natural numbers. Eureka Number Theory 4 November 3rd, 2012 04:51 AM
Additive theory of number and prime twins numbers ibougueye Number Theory 8 February 7th, 2012 04:33 PM
Shadows and angles HELP!!! T_T mathsilliterate Algebra 2 June 23rd, 2010 11:13 PM

Copyright © 2019 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.