My Math Forum Theory: The Shadows of Prime Numbers

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 March 25th, 2017, 10:15 PM #2 Senior Member   Joined: Aug 2012 Posts: 2,098 Thanks: 602 If you break this into paragraphs this will be much more readable. See if you can write out a clear mathematical exposition. Thanks from topsquark and Joppy
 March 27th, 2017, 02:42 AM #3 Newbie   Joined: May 2016 From: Pretoria Posts: 7 Thanks: 0 Number Theory - 42 and 27 Hi, I came onto the following: Draw a column and number it from 1 to 360 from top to bottom. In a column next to it use numbers 1 to 360 as a constant. Count 1 Constant 27 Count 2 Constant 27 Count 3 Constant 27 Count 4 Constant 27 Count .... Constant 27 Count .... Constant 27 Count 42 Constant 27 OK: 42 27 are the only numbers that has the following YAN properties: ( Excl: 78 87 and 69 9 ) [42 plus 27 = 69] [ 69 plus 96 =165 ] [ 165 minus 66 = 99 / 165 minus 99 = 66 ] Euclid: - x2 plus x plus 41 = prime number except i think 40 Could it be that his method meant: x2 plus x minus 1 plus 42 = prime number? Pyramid Giza:Edge to base = 42 degrees angle / Edge to edge at top 96 degrees angle - once the edge lines are completed / the apex had never been build.

,

,