May 15th, 2017, 10:26 AM  #181 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,550 Thanks: 2550 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  
May 16th, 2017, 12:39 AM  #182 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2017 From: . Posts: 338 Thanks: 8 Math Focus: Number theory 
I indeed I made an error on that statement. Probably I was a little stuck and frustrated by the need to prove everything which I later realised was necessary. I couldn't have meant if $x_0=x_1$ because that would have been easy to do. The latter proof is solid. 
May 19th, 2017, 03:51 AM  #183 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2017 From: . Posts: 338 Thanks: 8 Math Focus: Number theory 
Mathematics might not be my destiny. This is just one of those things that I have done as part and process of my self discovery. But I hope that one day I shall be remembered as the man who proved Collatz conjecture. I have an arxiv account but no endorsers. Any endorser can help in publishing this and include their name as a collaborator. Send me a private message on my profile. Also I can post the full proof from which more editing can be done. 
May 22nd, 2017, 02:32 AM  #184 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2017 From: . Posts: 338 Thanks: 8 Math Focus: Number theory 
Let $x_n$ be an odd positive integer. From the sequence’s formula, $x_{n+1}=\frac{3x_n+1}{2^k}$, $x_{n+2}=\frac{3x_{n+1}+1}{2^m}$ and so forth, $m,k\in \mathbb{Z^+}$.\\ For there to exist a cycle in the sequence, there must exist an odd integer $x_0$ such that $x_n=x_0$.\\ Let $x_1$, the next odd integer after $x_0$, be given by $$x_1=\frac{3x_0+1}{2^{a_1}}$$ $x_2$ will be given by $$x_2=\frac{3x_1+1}{2^{a_2}}$$ $x_2$ in terms of $x_0$ will be \begin{align*} x_2&=\frac{3(\frac{3x_0+1}{2^{a_1}})+1}{2^{a_2}}\\ &=\frac{9x_0+3+2^{a_1}}{2^{a_1+a_2}} \end{align*} $x_3$ will be given by \begin{align*} x_3&=\frac{3x_2+1}{2^{a_3}}\\ &=\frac{3(\frac{3x_1+1}{2^{a_2}})+1}{2^{a_3}}\\ &=\frac{3(\frac{9x_0+3+2^{a_1}}{2^{a_1+a_2}})+1}{2 ^{a_3}}\\ &=\frac{27x_0+9+3.2^{a_1}+2^{a_1+a_2}}{2^{a_1+a_2+ a_3}} \end{align*} From the three examples, we can generate a formula for $x_n$ in terms of $x_0$, which will be $$x_n=\frac{3^nx_0+3^{n1}+3^{n2}2^{a_1}+3^{n3}2^{a_1+a_2}+\cdots +3.2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n2}a_i}+2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n1}a_i}}{2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^na_i}}$$ Theorem If $x_n=x_0$, then $x_n=1$. Proof Let $x_n=x_0$, hence $$x_0=\frac{3^nx_0+3^{n1}+3^{n2}2^{a_1}+3^{n3}2^{a_1+a_2}+\cdots +3.2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n2}a_i}+2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n1}a_i}}{2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^na_i}}$$ Let $\sum\limits_{n=1}^na_i$ be $k$ $$2^kx_03^nx_0=3^{n1}+3^{n2}2^{a_1}+3^{n3}2^{a_1+a_2}+\cdots +3.2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n2}a_i}+2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n1}a_i}$$ $2^k$ can be expressed as $(2^{\frac{k}{n}})^n$ and $x_0$ as $(\sqrt[n]{x_0})^n$ $$\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n=3^{n1}+3^{n2}2^{a_1}+3^{n3}2^{a_1+a_2}+\cdots +3.2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n2}a_i}+2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n1}a_i}\tag{1}$$ When factoring, $$a^nb^n=(ab)(a^{n1}+a^{n2}b+a^{n3}b^2+\cdots +ab^{n2}+b^{n1})$$ This is same as $$a^nb^n=(ab)(b^{n1}+b^{n2}a+b^{n3}a^2+\cdots +ba^{n2}+a^{n1})$$ We therefore notice equation (1) holds iff the polynomial is regular. We factorise $\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n$. \begin{align*} \{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n&=(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\ (\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}+\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n2}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}\\ &\quad+\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n3}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^2+\cdots +\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n2}\\ &\quad+\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}) \\ \{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n&=\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\\ &\quad+\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n2}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\\ &\quad+\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n3}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^2(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})+\cdots\\ &\quad+\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n2}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\\ &\quad+\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}))\tag{2} \end{align*} Thus, each term in the polynomial in equation (1) is equal to each corresponding term in the polynomial in equation (2). Hence \begin{align*} 3^{n1}&=\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\\ 1&=(\sqrt[n]{x_0})^{n1}\sqrt[n]{x_0}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3)\\ x_0&=\frac{1}{(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3)}\tag{3} \end{align*} The next pair of equal terms, \begin{align*} 3^{n2}2^{a_1}&=\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n2}\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0})\\ 2^{a_1}&=\sqrt[n]{x_0}^{n2}\sqrt[n]{x_0}\sqrt[n]{x_0}2^{\frac{k}{n}}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3)\\ 2^{a_1}&=x_02^{\frac{k}{n}}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3) \end{align*} Substituting (3) \begin{align*} 2^{a_1}&=\frac{1}{(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3)}2^{\frac{k}{n}}(2^{\frac{k}{n}}3)\\ 2^{a_1}&=2^{\frac{k}{n}} \end{align*} Substituting $2^{a_1}$ in equation (3), $$x_0=\frac{1}{(2^{a_1}3)}$$ The only value that satisfies this equation such that $x_0$ and $a_1$ are both positive integers is $a_1=2$ to give $x_0=1$. 
May 22nd, 2017, 05:10 AM  #185  
Member Joined: Jul 2014 From: israel Posts: 76 Thanks: 3 
sorry but this is the first time i looked at your worked and i only read the last post which it seem to have all the proof you need to read so i didnt read all the rest of your posts i think you have a mistake Quote:
 
May 22nd, 2017, 11:24 AM  #186 
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2017 From: . Posts: 338 Thanks: 8 Math Focus: Number theory 
What specifically isn't clear? I have shown that the polynomial in equation 1 is regular and hence expressed equation 1 in a different way.. as shown in equation 2 such that each terms are equal. take this as an example.. lets say $$z=3x^4+3x^3+3$$ and $$z=ax^4+ax^3+a$$ isn't it obvious that a=3? 
May 22nd, 2017, 09:52 PM  #187 
Member Joined: Jul 2014 From: israel Posts: 76 Thanks: 3 
what dont you understand? there could be a case where the "next pair" can add to a diffrent multiple of 3 you wrote 3^(n1) = something but that something doesnt have to be 3^(n1) * t that t part can also have be a multiple of 3 so you what you are doing is in fact 3^(n1) = 3^(n+r) * d same goes for all the rest Last edited by isaac; May 22nd, 2017 at 10:42 PM. 
May 22nd, 2017, 10:05 PM  #188 
Member Joined: Jul 2014 From: israel Posts: 76 Thanks: 3 
if you want somthing that will help you check try to test this for negative cycles positive cycles: (1,4,2) negative cycles: (1,2) (5,14,7,20,10) (−17,−50,−25,−74,−37,−110,−55,−16 4 ,−82,−41,−122,−61,−182,−91,−272,−1 36,−68,−34) Last edited by isaac; May 22nd, 2017 at 10:43 PM. 
May 22nd, 2017, 10:42 PM  #189  
Banned Camp Joined: Mar 2017 From: . Posts: 338 Thanks: 8 Math Focus: Number theory  Quote:
Also still, it cannot be a multiple of 3. the equation would not hold. see how the factoring rules applies. If this is still not clear for you then we can try this other method.. $$\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n=3^{n1}+3^{n2}2^{a_1}+3^{n3}2^{a_1+a_2}+\cdots +3.2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n2}a_i}+2^{\sum\limits_{n=1}^{n1}a_i}$$ $$a^nb^n=(ab)(b^{n1}+b^{n2}a+b^{n3}a^2+\cdots +ba^{n2}+a^{n1})$$ if $ab=1$ then $$a^nb^n=b^{n1}+b^{n2}a+b^{n3}a^2+\cdots +ba^{n2}+a^{n1}$$ So it is clear that since the polynomial in our example is regular, then $$\{2^{\frac{k}{n}}\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^n=1$$ and $$3^{n1}=\{3\!\sqrt[n]{x_0}\}^{n1}$$ Also, testing this for negative cycles gives cycles for those integers you have shown. Last edited by Mariga; May 22nd, 2017 at 10:53 PM.  
May 22nd, 2017, 11:05 PM  #190 
Member Joined: Jul 2014 From: israel Posts: 76 Thanks: 3 
please check again until you will get what i wrote i dont think you understand what i wrote .... i told you where is the problem in your proof ... check that transition again 

Tags 
collatz, conjecture, proof 
Search tags for this page 
math forum collatz,forum math proof collatz conjecture,forum math collatz,collatz maths forum,collatz math forum,progress collatz,relative numbers in math
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
On the Collatz Conjecture  JwClaassen  Number Theory  0  March 18th, 2017 09:47 AM 
collatz conjecture  isaac  Number Theory  6  March 15th, 2016 02:12 AM 
About Collatz conjecture  vlagluz  Number Theory  10  November 5th, 2014 12:27 AM 
The marvellous proof of the collatz conjecture  lwgula  Number Theory  2  October 30th, 2014 03:02 PM 
Collatz conjecture & More (Please Help)  Aika  Number Theory  6  April 29th, 2012 07:34 AM 