November 22nd, 2016, 09:24 PM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,012 Thanks: 24  Math has a big problem...
Math has a big problem... 1 is equal to 1 x 1, to 1x1x1...x1 (till a finite number of times)... And going elsewhere in the real wolrd, for example on a cartesian plane, 10 or 10x1 or 1 or 10 x 0.1 ... can be exactly the same think, just scaled. But I use this ambiguos geometrical trick to solve Fermat and Beal... The only unambiguous numbers... are the Irrationals, so just when well be able to works with them as our new "primes", we will understand how real physic world works... Since I was non considered, due to my lack of rigour, I will try to be as sarcastic as possible with stupids who think they hold the truth since they are good Abstract Algebra players... With all respect to those lost, or are losting, their life making genuine research... The academic math wolrd is a castle made of brick, lies and betrayals ...as any other castle in the history was... Very unhappy to be considered just a donkey... when we, all, are just humans... Thanks Ciao Stefano Last edited by complicatemodulus; November 22nd, 2016 at 09:28 PM. 
November 22nd, 2016, 09:35 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2015 From: CA Posts: 1,289 Thanks: 664 
You haven't got anything better to fill your days with than to post incomprehensible babble on here?

November 22nd, 2016, 10:04 PM  #3 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,012 Thanks: 24 
And you have nothing to do better than discuss of infinity and infimus here on this little grain of dust ? Try tounderstand, try tounderstand, try tounderstand.... in pace... 
November 23rd, 2016, 02:42 AM  #4 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 6,875 Thanks: 2239 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
You sound like Mobel.

November 23rd, 2016, 03:19 AM  #5  
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 1,570 Thanks: 613 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff.  Quote:
Dan  
November 23rd, 2016, 03:24 AM  #6  
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 1,570 Thanks: 613 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff.  Quote:
Without the Algebra how can you define the irrationals? Dan  
November 23rd, 2016, 05:44 AM  #7  
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,012 Thanks: 24  No pls !!!! Quote:
You agree that if 1 (in our unknown real world) is a distance, it is equal to 1x1 that is an area ? It means we don't know with numbers if we are talking of a distance, or of an area. Pls don't put it in brawl, I won't make concerning, at the moment, that the area is an infinite sum of 1 long lines while, unfortunately, some math say it is 1/12. I would like to rest feet on the ground saying just that in our math, when we stick it on an cartesian plane, 1 it's an height, but also equal to 1x1 area, ...and realizing that I become able to crack Fermat the Last cryptic equation... Quote:
Just a question: you agree that when we wrote 1, we are writing $ 1,\overline{00}$ ? And this has implications... [*]If there is a lack of rigour to your work, that is your problem not anyone else's. Nobody at all is under any obligation to provide it for you. The fact that you don't understand what you are doing doesn't make it correct. Nor does it make it incorrect, but it does drastically reduce the utility of your work and the interest it generates.[/list][/QUOTE] I did my best, I try to be honest and calm... I won't say that there are just stupid readers don't understand and accept my proof... I simply note that I've back no (close to ZERO !) answers.... and since we are talking of one of the most importante problems in math 2 choice: or I'm clearly in wrong (and i think not since numbers works), or too many "professors" are thinking and trying to use my work to post a new proof without putting me in the References (I already discover some) I spent 8 years on that... Now I'm little more skilled about my errors, and seems to me that the big part of the work I rewrite several times, it's correct (english a part for the moment). But till my reformulation of FLT and Beal will not be accepted (proved or disproved it's less important !) I have to knock elsewhere to wake up sleeping minds... After consuming my fingers... I decide to use sarcasm... With all respect for thoose as you and others here really work on that pls answer me on that: It' clear we have the "4th formulation" of Fermat the last writing: $\displaystyle C^n= 2*\sum_{X=1}^{A}(X^n(X1)^n) + Delta $ and or: $\displaystyle C^n= 2*\sum_{X=1}^{B} (X^n(X1)^n)  Delta $ where: $\displaystyle Delta= \sum_{X=A+1}^{B} (X^n(X1)^n) $ Why Arxiv refuse it ? Thanks ciao Stefano Last edited by complicatemodulus; November 23rd, 2016 at 06:35 AM.  
November 23rd, 2016, 05:57 AM  #8 
Math Team Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 1,570 Thanks: 613 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timeywimey stuff.  A brief comment here: Technically when you are calling 1 as a distance you need to include a unit. So 1 m is what you are looking at for distance and 1 x 1 m^2 for the area. This is not pure Math because it is applied to a physical concept. Physical concepts have little or no meaning in Mathematics. Dan 
November 23rd, 2016, 06:29 AM  #9  
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,012 Thanks: 24  Quote:
But also search for a better way to better represent our physics models... I'm dreaming of a new math as I dreamed about the two hands clock... $\displaystyle A^2 = \sum_{X=1}^{A} (2X1)$ It's equal on a graph, both, to a sum of bar with zero thichness, or columns height (2X1), base 1. This make the difference... When we talk of areas we immediately see we are squaring a derivate... and if a condition is that the area must be an integer, and we have an upper limit that is an irrational (fixed by the initial conditions) will be clear to all that such limit can be rised by our Sum, nor the area bellow the derivate till that irrational cannot be fulfitted with integer columns... (except in one case when we can pull out the irrational "part" from the sum, for example $(\sqrt 2)^2 $ haveing back an integer). Thanks ciao Stefano Last edited by complicatemodulus; November 23rd, 2016 at 06:36 AM.  
November 23rd, 2016, 08:21 PM  #10  
Senior Member Joined: Sep 2016 From: USA Posts: 114 Thanks: 45 Math Focus: Dynamical systems, analytic function theory, numerics  Quote:
1. There is no geometric ambiguity. Green doesn't specify a car or a house either but this doesn't mean the concept of green is ambiguous. 2. The irrationals aren't prime. Unlike the naturals, the reals are a field which as you have noticed means they have some nice properties for solving equations. This also means they have no primes. irrational or otherwise. 3 isn't prime in the reals, nor is 2, 31, or anything else (except for 0 according to a few authors). 3. You almost certainly haven't solved FMT or Beal's conjecture and I will absolutely guarantee you haven't solved both. Spend more time reading respectable texts and less time inventing crazy.  

Tags 
big, math, problem 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
math problem  azzey  Algebra  6  December 29th, 2011 01:26 PM 
Math problem again :/  azelio  Algebra  1  October 24th, 2010 09:05 AM 
Math problem  Ghuraba  Algebra  6  November 23rd, 2009 06:01 PM 
Math Problem!  caitz  Algebra  2  September 23rd, 2009 10:30 PM 
Easy problem in turkey math olympiad problem  codename211  Math Events  11  August 8th, 2007 07:30 PM 