My Math Forum  

Go Back   My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

Thanks Tree22Thanks
Closed Thread
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
December 16th, 2016, 09:22 PM   #91
Banned Camp
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

There are now some interesting concerning for thos understand what I did:

1) Better investigating we can distinguish in:

(1) $f:\mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N}$

a) In the case we start from an Integer and we arrive to an Integer Result, but we have no restrictions on how the transformation happens.

b) In a most strictly definition, for what is necessary to recall the signify of Unit Tessel (be it a segment, a flat shape or an hyperdimensional tessel, where the "function" strictly work with re-arrangements of such Units.

Once we understood that, it's clear Fermat's case works with Power of integers JUST, so I show thant to Power's property, we can use the most strictly definition of the (1), so we have the very easy and intuitive lever to close the elegant proof: we can just re-arrange Unit Tessel or integer/Rational Gnomon Tessels, so it's enough to prove that the trasformation imply to go Irrational (so via limit) to prove Fermat is right. And it's nice because we have a more clear vision of what the proper "infinite descent" means.

Once again, I repeat, Beal follow as a much less easy problem, once we understand that in the case (b) a common solution has a common $Base$, because all 3 sets must be a collection of Units or Gnomons, so since Intereg and Rational Powers are always Built on a Abscissa starting from the Unit, to a certain value we know as $Base$ then we don't need to search far from there, we have just to find the condition that will balance the heights of the gomons that, as told, can be ordered in just one rising way.

Linearization process, so the reduction of the problem to a Linear Gnomons, I several Time show here, let think become very easy.

Are my words blown in the wind, or someone someone is listening?

I won't make theorems, I simply play with well working gears...

Last edited by complicatemodulus; December 16th, 2016 at 09:27 PM.
complicatemodulus is offline  
December 19th, 2016, 06:51 AM   #92
Banned Camp
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

It's clear to someone the difference in the case $n=2$ (linear derivate) and the case $n>2$ what my Step Sum (so the scaling) square ?

It's clear that the curve change rising K, becoming $y'=nX^n$ just at the limit ?
complicatemodulus is offline  
December 19th, 2016, 08:01 AM   #93
Banned Camp
Joined: Dec 2012

Posts: 1,028
Thanks: 24

Here going Rational K=4:

Here the table of the gnomons, all are Base 0,25 Height as in the last colum:

Rising K, no way to rise the given Area: A^3+B^3 = 5^3+6^3 = 341, we still rest bellow...

Clear while several months ago I post Flt is a collection of Dedekind sections ???


Last edited by complicatemodulus; December 19th, 2016 at 08:51 AM.
complicatemodulus is offline  
December 19th, 2016, 08:57 AM   #94
Global Moderator
greg1313's Avatar
Joined: Oct 2008
From: London, Ontario, Canada - The Forest City

Posts: 7,807
Thanks: 1045

Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond
There's been ample time for anyone to respond. Topic closed (this is not a blogging site).
Thanks from romsek
greg1313 is offline  
Closed Thread

  My Math Forum > College Math Forum > Number Theory

big, math, problem

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
math problem azzey Algebra 6 December 29th, 2011 01:26 PM
Math problem again :/ azelio Algebra 1 October 24th, 2010 09:05 AM
Math problem Ghuraba Algebra 6 November 23rd, 2009 06:01 PM
Math Problem! caitz Algebra 2 September 23rd, 2009 10:30 PM
Easy problem in turkey math olympiad problem codename211 Math Events 11 August 8th, 2007 07:30 PM

Copyright © 2018 My Math Forum. All rights reserved.