My Math Forum How do I Simplify HypergeometricPFQ and MeijerG Sums?

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 November 3rd, 2016, 11:05 AM #1 Newbie   Joined: Sep 2016 From: Tempe, Arizona Posts: 6 Thanks: 1 How do I Simplify HypergeometricPFQ and MeijerG Sums? I've derived a formula for the Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$ which is illustrated in the plot below and on the following website, and am now attempting to derive a formula for the first-order derivative $\zeta'(s)$, which is the context of this question. Illustration of $\zeta(s)$ Formula The following plot illustrates the absolute value of my formula for $\zeta(s)$ (blue curve) evaluated along the critical line. The $Zeta[s]$ function defined in the Wolfram Language (orange curve) is shown as a reference. The red dots represent the location of the zeta zeros. I'm having problems with evaluation times of the following two expressions where $s$ is complex, $x$ is real, $n$ is a positive integer, and the $HypergeometricPFQ$ and $MeijerG$ functions are defined in the Wolfram Language. I believe these two expressions are related as they're terms from two different formula's I'm investigating related to the first-order derivative $\zeta'(s)$ of the Riemann zeta function. $$HypergeometricPFQ[\{1-s,1-s\},\{2-s,2-s\},-2in\pi x]+HypergeometricPFQ[\{1-s,1-s\},\{2-s,2-s\},2in\pi x]$$ $$MeijerG[\{\{\},\{1+s,1+s\}\},\{\{1,s,s\},\{\}\},-2in\pi x]-MeijerG[\{\{\},\{1+s,1+s\}\},\{\{1,s,s\},\{\}\},2in\pi x]$$ Does anyone have any ideas on how I might simplify either of these two expressions to improve evaluation times?

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post rarian Calculus 1 October 14th, 2014 08:56 AM n3rdwannab3 Calculus 1 January 17th, 2014 03:41 PM nubshat Calculus 2 November 13th, 2012 05:04 PM julian21 Real Analysis 1 November 27th, 2010 03:07 PM rmas Algebra 1 November 12th, 2010 07:11 PM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top