My Math Forum Theorem about prime numbers

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

August 27th, 2016, 07:05 AM   #11
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,674
Thanks: 2654

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mobel Am I not jerk and bankrupt morally?
Your post would support that view, yes. I talk to you when I have interest in doing so. I'm an optimist. I believe that jerks, the morally bankrupt and the dumb can change.

I have no interest in writing a thread of number theoretical results. It's not my field. So don't wait up.

August 27th, 2016, 07:13 AM   #12
Banned Camp

Joined: Dec 2013

Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 41

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie Your post would support that view, yes. I talk to you when I have interest in doing so. I'm an optimist. I believe that jerks, the morally bankrupt and the dumb can change. I have no interest in writing a thread of number theoretical results. It's not my field. So don't wait up.
Oh no! dumb never change. As he get older he become more and more dumb.
If we compare the money I give every year to charities and the money you give the charities I can assure you that you give ZERO!!! I give every year  (4 digits) to the needy.
You do not know me in real life.
You are not only dumb you are deeply dishonest.
I will not be surprised by your records ( I do not care about them).

August 27th, 2016, 07:15 AM   #13
Banned Camp

Joined: Dec 2013

Posts: 1,117
Thanks: 41

Quote:
 Originally Posted by v8archie Your post would support that view, yes. I talk to you when I have interest in doing so. I'm an optimist. I believe that jerks, the morally bankrupt and the dumb can change. I have no interest in writing a thread of number theoretical results. It's not my field. So don't wait up.
You can send any NEW result even in your field but you have NONE.
Zero zero zero
Blah blah blah yes! Big mouth!!! yes!

August 27th, 2016, 09:48 AM   #14
Math Team

Joined: May 2013
From: The Astral plane

Posts: 2,256
Thanks: 926

Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mobel You can send any NEW result even in your field but you have NONE. Zero zero zero Blah blah blah yes! Big mouth!!! yes!
I have discovered a really neat theorem: Given any n > 2 there are no positive integers a, b, and c such that $\displaystyle a^n + b^n = c^n$.

You are aware, of course, since Fermat never actually wrote down the proof that he 1) realized his error, or 2) didn't care about writing it down. Either way, Fermat was being something of a jerk about the whole thing.

How is what you are doing any different? We have no proof that you know what you are talking about. All we are asking is for you to explain what you are doing. Is that so hard to understand?

-Dan

Last edited by topsquark; August 27th, 2016 at 09:51 AM.

August 27th, 2016, 10:08 AM   #15
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 7,674
Thanks: 2654

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 Originally Posted by mobel Oh no! dumb never change. As he get older he become more and more dumb. If we compare the money I give every year to charities and the money you give the charities I can assure you that you give ZERO!!! I give every year  (4 digits) to the needy.
1) Apparently so in your case.
2) You have absolutely no idea what I do for charity. But this clearly illustrates you standard of proof. You quite clearly spend your life guessing and pretending that it makes you better than everybody else.

You have no idea what real poverty looks like. You probably only give to charity to make yourself feel better and to make yourself believe that you are better than others. You certainly give nothing that would impact on your quality of life.

In reality you are a pathetic, abnoxious jerk who has made no positive contribution to anybody's life. You know that and try to compensate for your inadequacies by being a keyboard warrior on internet forums.

 August 28th, 2016, 09:35 PM #16 Banned Camp   Joined: Dec 2012 Posts: 1,028 Thanks: 24 mobel... as you know ...I'm a cranck too... I discover (10 years ago) that if $n$ is a prime: if we make $z= n!/n^2$ than $z\in Q$, While if $z\in N$ $n$ is not a prime number... This is the definition of a prime number... as your... for so it's "trivial"... You agree we discover nothing ? Thanks Ciao Stefano I re-activate an old page on primes... : http://maruelli.com/primes.htm Last edited by complicatemodulus; August 28th, 2016 at 09:39 PM.

 Tags numbers, prime, theorem

 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post Pengkuan Math 61 February 29th, 2016 04:46 PM shaimaa saif Algebra 10 November 17th, 2015 08:02 AM Shreedhar Jha New Users 2 June 3rd, 2015 12:28 PM PerAA Number Theory 5 March 4th, 2013 04:50 AM Eureka Number Theory 4 November 3rd, 2012 03:51 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top