July 29th, 2016, 09:06 AM  #21  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
Quote:
Rather than attacking professional mathematicians who have better things to do than reviews the halfbaked ravings of fools (or perhaps they are just too lazy to do it), you should be attacking those fools who make people reluctant to listen to the rest of the amateurs. But you are apparently too dumb to see that.  
July 29th, 2016, 09:24 AM  #22  
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,117 Thanks: 41  Quote:
Any problem as complex as it is has some weak angle to attack. All that you need is to see that weakness. Professional mathematician are FULL OF CONTEMPT TOWARD amateurs. I have no doubt about this. I will stay disrespectful of those guys. I know in another forum someone who is professional mathematician but he has never shown any contempt toward amateurs. Better than that he shows how to improve their ideas by giving them what to read. I will be always disrespectful toward those people and you are ONE of them. There is a distinction about mastering mathematical basics and techniques and solving a hard problem. You need to have the right approach. Then you will start gathering the tools you need (technical step). As long as you do not have the right and correct approach you could have a deep knowledge of all the mathematical fields they will worth NOTHING. Only imagination and innovation will help you not a full understanding of a problem. YOU ARE TOO DUMB TO UNDERSTAND THIS!!!  
July 29th, 2016, 09:30 AM  #23 
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,117 Thanks: 41 
No knowledge will help to solve hard problem otherwise many open problems will be solved by professional mathematician. A problem is called open when what the professional mathematician know is NOT HELPFUL. There is a need of something else : the right approach!!!! That is why such problems will be solved by amateurs. Amateurs are enslaved by some system of taboos. Amateurs will try to find a breach in what all mathematicians consider as true. 
July 29th, 2016, 10:20 AM  #24 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
Your logic is flawed. All problems are solved by applying existing knowledge in a new way. There's nothing special about amateurs. According to your logic Andrew Wiles wouldn't have solved FLT. Instead some buffoon on an internet forum would have solved it with highschool algebra.

July 29th, 2016, 10:34 AM  #25  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  No I'm not. I'm not even a professional mathematician. I don't even have an interest in research. I just call people out for continually claiming errorstrewn nonsense as solutions to problems, but I only do that after they have ignored responses that highlight the problems with their work. You need to understand a problem in order to know what things have been tried and why they failed. You need to understand a problem to explain why your solution makes any sense. Quote:
 
July 29th, 2016, 10:36 AM  #26  
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,117 Thanks: 41  Quote:
Wait and see. Do not forget that Andrew Wiles made many mistakes before reaching his conclusion. Read his story. My logic is very simple. Any problem could be solved with elementary tools. Mathematician are taking long road when a short road will lead to the same result. They are using "sophisticated package" to wrap something very simple. You are just fucking words by saying "existing knowledge in a new way". Why you are reluctant to accept "correct and right approach". Always the same behavior : " HUGE CONTEMPT "  
July 29th, 2016, 10:44 AM  #27 
Banned Camp Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,117 Thanks: 41 
This sentence is deeply wrong "You need to understand a problem in order to know what things have been tried and why they failed. You need to understand a problem to explain why your solution makes any sense." You need nothing OF THAT to make a big discovery! Many times (I let you google the examples) misunderstanding of a problem X lead to the solution to a problem Y which is more harder than problem X. You are putting absurd hurdles to those who are trying to solve problems and make big discoveries!!!!! Solutions are waiting the guy who is going to discover them. Someone working on biology field could solve a huge mathematical problem!!!! IF YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT I SAY THEN SHUT UP!!! 
July 29th, 2016, 10:46 AM  #28 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
1) There is no "correct and right approach". There are many solutions to every problem. 2) This in no way means that any of them are simple and use only elementary tools. 3) Every mathematician make mistakes and follows blind paths  that is part of understanding the problem. 4) You have no evidence for your ridiculous claim that "any problem could be solved with elementary tools". It demostrably false. Most knowledge has only been acquired after completely new areas of mathematics have been opened up after highschool algebra. You are just filled with irrational hatred towards people who were able to do something that you didn't get the opportunity to do. It's a deep unpleasant characteristic. 
July 29th, 2016, 10:52 AM  #29  
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,663 Thanks: 2643 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Quote:
Your conduct is not appropriate to the forum. Please try to exhibit some selfcontrol.  
July 29th, 2016, 11:27 AM  #30 
Global Moderator Joined: Oct 2008 From: London, Ontario, Canada  The Forest City Posts: 7,945 Thanks: 1136 Math Focus: Elementary mathematics and beyond 
This is a number theory forum and this discussion is definitely not number theory. Thread closed.


Tags 
amateur, carmichael, chinese, numbers, solved 
Search tags for this page 
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Chinese Remainder!!!!!!!!!!!!  USAMO Reaper  Math  8  January 30th, 2015 06:26 PM 
carmichael function  mared  Algebra  1  April 10th, 2014 02:30 PM 
(SOLVED) A question regarding two ways to pick numbers.  zengjinlian  Advanced Statistics  1  October 23rd, 2012 12:13 PM 
Chinese Maths  baba484  New Users  11  July 28th, 2009 02:53 PM 