May 6th, 2016, 05:13 AM  #1 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 158 Thanks: 4  Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem and Beal's Conjecture 
May 6th, 2016, 09:34 AM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Dec 2015 From: holland Posts: 163 Thanks: 37 Math Focus: tetration 
Very interesting indeed.. But it says it is rejected and furthermore there is nothing to read..

May 6th, 2016, 10:23 AM  #3 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,502 Thanks: 2511 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra 
You could read the paper. It's the three page PDF I expect. But since it's a three page PDF purporting to solve not one, but two difficult problems and has been rejected twice, it seems highly unlikely that it is worth reading. 
May 6th, 2016, 11:30 AM  #4 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 158 Thanks: 4 
Why don"t you simply go through my work yourself and then acknowledge that this is the proof. 
May 6th, 2016, 02:34 PM  #5 
Banned Camp Joined: Apr 2016 From: Australia Posts: 244 Thanks: 29 Math Focus: horses,cash me outside how bow dah, trash doves 
Hold on wasn't Fermat's last theorem prove by some English chap like 2005 or something?
Last edited by skipjack; May 6th, 2016 at 09:38 PM. 
May 6th, 2016, 02:35 PM  #6 
Banned Camp Joined: Apr 2016 From: Australia Posts: 244 Thanks: 29 Math Focus: horses,cash me outside how bow dah, trash doves 
I can't for the life of me remember his name, Andrew Wiles maybe?
Last edited by skipjack; May 6th, 2016 at 09:40 PM. 
May 6th, 2016, 04:59 PM  #7 
Math Team Joined: Dec 2013 From: Colombia Posts: 7,502 Thanks: 2511 Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra  Because I'm more than 99% certain that it is not a proof and I have better things to do with my time than to read a paper that has been rejected twice. I'd be more interested in reading why they rejected it for the first time.

May 6th, 2016, 11:48 PM  #8 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 158 Thanks: 4 
The so called maths professionals have the same attitude i.e. they are in denial that the solution to both similar problems is just as simple as the quote of the problems themselves. Andrew Wiles spent years on FLT, published a solution with errors before publishing a 100 page solution. 1 million dollars is placed on the solution of Beal"s conjecture. These are the reasons my correct simple solution is not taken seriously. On the reason given as to why my proof won't be published the reviewer said he had issues with equating indeterminate coefficients (to use his words) with fixed coefficients. His reason is nonsense

May 7th, 2016, 01:41 AM  #9 
Senior Member Joined: May 2013 Posts: 115 Thanks: 10 
Mr.Awojobi or Mr.Otendute or whatever name you use. You have tried posting your "proofs" in various fora,in various times,under various names.Only some of the flaws remain the same (ie.taking an equality as an identity). I believe you are aware of this and only want to make a fuss,have people talk about you,or write etc. 
May 7th, 2016, 04:41 AM  #10 
Senior Member Joined: Aug 2010 Posts: 158 Thanks: 4 
An equation becomes an identity if the left hand side is equal to the right hand side for every value of the 2 variables written in red ink. Of course I have proved why these are not identities.


Tags 
beal, conjecture, fermat, proof, theorem 
Search tags for this page 
beal conjecture proof,solution to beals conjecture,beal conjecture,beal conjecture site:mymathforum.com
Click on a term to search for related topics.

Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem and Beal's Conjecture  MrAwojobi  Number Theory  1  September 29th, 2015 08:22 AM 
Proof Beal's conjecture and Fermat's last theorem  HuyThang1981  Number Theory  17  November 21st, 2014 03:57 PM 
Proof of beals conjecture  akhil verma  Number Theory  29  July 21st, 2013 05:51 AM 
Simple Proof of Fermat's Last Theorem and Beal's Conjecture  MrAwojobi  Number Theory  21  January 8th, 2011 10:11 AM 
On The Beal Conjecture And Fermat's Last Theorem.  Don Blazys  Number Theory  15  April 3rd, 2009 10:04 PM 