Adam Ledger

also I have a pretty picture to add additional meaning to post

Attached Images

VIP FOR ZETA1.jpg (81.6 KB, 15 views)

Country Boy

So what about it?

Adam Ledger

lol I slapped this up a week ago give me a minute to find it again and ill elaborate.

v8archie

It's clearly not worth noting carefully at all

Adam Ledger

yes clearly lol because this guy says so

Adam Ledger

ok archie its not as interesting as your ideas you are right its just a random array of symbols i printed just as all of my posts are

v8archie

My meaning was that since you can't remember why the function should be in any way something to note carefully, it can't be all that worth noting. If it were worth noting, you'd have remembered.

Adam Ledger

i did not arrive at the above function via any form of random parameter analysis, it arose after quite an extensive calculation involving the zeta function on the complex plane, and if something strikes me as significant ill normally share something about it.

I can remember the exact circumstance because i just study these kind of things all day, every day, and I'm unemployed so yes i mean literally all day. I can put up a graph for anyone sincerely interested in number theory and my general advice.

almost everything in number theory relates to the zeta. its pointless to bother explaining further ill probably misphrase something it will allow you to paint me as an idiot and besides, you have already made it clear that my work isn't of any interest to other mathematicians ... hmmmk?

Joppy

Personally I don't think this is an argument about the possible importance of your findings or your credibility or what you can and can't remember or your employment status.

It's simply an argument of why create a new thread about something you don't pose any sort of question or statement for.

People on this forum won't respond well to you just blurting out your thoughts or some seemingly arbitrary function or idea. Give it purpose and meaning without expecting others to find the significance themselves.

v8archie

But you haven't. You have, to use your own words, just slapped this up without any indication as to why you believe it might be interesting or useful to anybody.

Even now you aren't communicating anything of any use to anybody. You haven't even communicated what you were trying to achieve when you found this.

The problem isn't in your mis-phrasing of things, its that you haven't explained anything in any of your posts up to now. We are left to guess what they are supposed to be about.

As an aside, I disagree that the Zeta function is important in almost all of number theory. It is an important functions, but I think it is important in very little number theory. It is more important in Analysis, but even then not in a very large part of analysis.