
Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
April 7th, 2016, 03:05 PM  #1 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2016 From: London Posts: 3 Thanks: 0  Finding a solution for Riemann's hypothesis
Hello to everyone. During this month I've been trying to proof the Riemann hypothesis but, unsurprisingly, I haven't proof that it is correct or wrong. I want to discuss some of my ideas and some of the mathematics that I've been with someone. If anyone is interested PM me.

April 7th, 2016, 07:36 PM  #2 
Senior Member Joined: Feb 2016 From: Australia Posts: 1,838 Thanks: 653 Math Focus: Yet to find out. 
I'm glad you said unsurprisingly . Good luck on the $1m!

April 8th, 2016, 12:36 AM  #3 
Banned Camp Joined: Apr 2016 From: Australia Posts: 244 Thanks: 29 Math Focus: horses,cash me outside how bow dah, trash doves 
ok ive been working on these kinds of problems for more than a month and so why don't you just go ahead and post your ideas, then ill tell you what I think.

April 30th, 2016, 10:52 AM  #4 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2016 From: KY, USA Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Riemann Ideas
If no one else will start, I will. Caveat: I'm not a mathematician and I really can't read formulas, but I feel like I grasp the concepts. So I may need translations if you reply in formulas. First point of interest: There is a prime quadratic sieve that is basically a visual representation of the Sieve of Eratosthenes (see graph at Quadratic Sieve  from Wolfram MathWorld) Without a formula I don't know how to express it, but a look at that graph indicates that there is a strict mathematical order to the primes. They are the whole numbers on the number line that are not intersected by line segments connecting whole numbers 2 and above on the upper and lower bounds of the parabola. To me that eliminates any idea of random primes, and it isn't because I have seen a graph that extends beyond 1000's of primes, it just seems that if it were not true, then we have to admit that the use of graphs is an illegitimate representation of mathematical ideas, sorry Mr. Descartes. (If I am making a false assumption about mathematics here, please enlighten me.} Second point of interest: I have heard it stated that a Fourier transform of the values of the points on the 1/2 line where the nontrivial zeroes are (i.e., 14.13..., 21.02..., 25.01..., etc., see Riemann Zeta Function Zeros  from Wolfram MathWorld) will give the primes. If this is true, then a Fourier transform of the primes will give values of the nontrivial zeroes on the 1/2 line (Fourier Transform  from Wolfram MathWorld) So, these 2 points, to me, represent 2 legs of a geometric proof that requires 1 more leg, connecting the sieve to the transforms. Anyone able to speak to this? 
April 30th, 2016, 04:10 PM  #5 
Newbie Joined: Apr 2016 From: KY, USA Posts: 2 Thanks: 0  Correction to above
Correction, the transform and the sieve are connected, as they both contain the prime numbers. The third leg is to prove the zeroes always correlate with the primes.


Tags 
finding, hypothesis, riemann, riemanns, solution 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Help with Riemann's Hypothesis  robinlrandall  New Users  2  August 23rd, 2014 03:10 PM 
Riemann Hypothesis.  mathbalarka  Number Theory  0  October 31st, 2013 12:54 AM 
Do you believe the Riemann hypothesis?  Eureka  Number Theory  1  September 12th, 2011 01:07 PM 
The Riemann Hypothesis and what it say  MyNameIsVu  Complex Analysis  2  April 16th, 2009 07:51 AM 
Riemann Hypothesis  Whoever  Number Theory  72  February 11th, 2009 06:03 AM 