
Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum 
 LinkBack  Thread Tools  Display Modes 
May 15th, 2008, 11:16 AM  #1  
Newbie Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5 Thanks: 0  natural numbers from sets....not very natural
Hi people, first post here. For some reason the other day, I started writing a small math paper, not academic or anything, more a simple demonstration of how maths can come about, aimed mainly at my little brother who is 8 and for my own fun/interest. Now I like to always think of how mathematical ideas came about and the history of techniques etc. I am familliar with math history and number theory. One thing that I don't like the idea of is Cantor's method for introducing the natural numbers through sets, where we have the empty set, or null set = 0 then the set whos only member is the empty set = 1, and so on. I am not having a go at Cantor or sets, sets are really useful and great ideas and Cantor is clearly a brilliant mind but it doesn't seem natural, or too abstract. Below I will post the first page of what I wrote and would love to hear feedback. none of it is new but it provides a simple view of how to introduce math through natural things. Also think an 8 year old may prefer it to sets Quote:
I would like to continue this and i think the natural progression of subject would be: Number system (base 10), subtraction, negative numbers and the number line, multiplication and division. I would love to hear your thoughts. Thanks  
May 15th, 2008, 11:52 AM  #2 
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms 
Sets are a good basis for mathematics (though other bases can be used instead), but they're terrible for pedagogy. I would teach numbers as counting to children (ages perhaps 15), and move to numbers as distance (around perhaps age 45: going from the discrete to the continuous). Only much later (high school or early college) would I reverse this by showing that integer problems are, generally speaking, far more difficult than realnumber problems. Only *after* that would I introduce the formalist bases for all mathematics: ZermeloFrankel set theory, Peano/Robinson arithmetic, the Axioms of Choice and Foundation, etc.

May 16th, 2008, 03:38 PM  #3 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,270 Thanks: 1958 
Eight is old enough for the approach to take into account the child's abilities. For instance, does he like mathematical problems or puzzles? Would he have the tenacity and patience to "solve" the following: CROSS ROADS +  DANGER where each letter consistently stands for a different specific digit? 
May 16th, 2008, 06:16 PM  #4 
Newbie Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5 Thanks: 0 
I didn't mean it was to teach an 8 year old, I was merely saying that i liked the idea of coming up with all of maths from nature. Obviously my brother knows what counting is and distance and crossing the road and a number of activities, if he wasn't interested in this then i wouldn't try to force him. I said it was just fun for me to write this too and a good way to introduce maths? 
May 17th, 2008, 12:55 AM  #5 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,270 Thanks: 1958 
Is he sufficiently interested (and able) to solve the problem I posted above?

May 17th, 2008, 01:49 AM  #6 
Newbie Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5 Thanks: 0 
I wasn't really writing this for him, and he probably doesn't have that much of an interest and probably wouldn't be able to solve that. It was more just a fun little thing for me to do and i thought it would appeal to a younger audience. 
May 17th, 2008, 01:58 PM  #7 
Global Moderator Joined: Dec 2006 Posts: 20,270 Thanks: 1958 
There's nothing I can see in your approach that would make it interesting to youngsters. Also, it doesn't draw attention to the fact that, for example, five books, five coins, five sheep, etc., share something: "fiveness"!

May 18th, 2008, 05:51 AM  #8  
Global Moderator Joined: Nov 2006 From: UTC 5 Posts: 16,046 Thanks: 938 Math Focus: Number theory, computational mathematics, combinatorics, FOM, symbolic logic, TCS, algorithms  Quote:
 
May 18th, 2008, 07:06 AM  #9  
Newbie Joined: May 2008 Posts: 5 Thanks: 0  Quote:
Again I think that sounds a little too abstract, just as the set example I gave.  
May 18th, 2008, 01:47 PM  #10 
Senior Member Joined: Oct 2007 From: Chicago Posts: 1,701 Thanks: 3 
Skipjack means the object delimited by the noun phrase five markers shares the property of fiveness with the object five coins. That property is the property of having 5 member, hence the name 5ness. The problem with the statement "it's too abstract" is that math is abstract. Everything done in math is done on either an abstract object, or a generalized token. I don't see how "fiveness" is any more abstract than calling a "something" a "1", and a "nothing" a "0". (pedantry follows) What something are we discussing? Can it be anything? (nevermind the abstract required to understand the concept of "anything".) Does it have to be a book? a box? What about a gallon? (and why that unit of measure?) The something versus nothing distinction is more natural, as evidenced by the fact that certain indigenous cultures have names for only those two concepts certain other cultures have "none", "one", "few", and "many" but I wouldn't call it less abstract, and the concept of "kness" as a noun is a more useful abstraction than the distinction between something and nothing, as it also encompasses that distinction. I'm inclined to agree with CRG, but I think sets should be introduced and played with a little earlier, although I think the utterly abstract formalities should be left for later in the education. 

Tags 
natural, numbers, setsnot 
Thread Tools  
Display Modes  

Similar Threads  
Thread  Thread Starter  Forum  Replies  Last Post 
Natural numbers  yo79  Math Events  2  April 7th, 2013 03:11 AM 
Natural numbers  EulerRules  Number Theory  9  March 5th, 2013 10:39 AM 
power set of the natural numbers  blabla  Real Analysis  2  February 25th, 2012 02:31 PM 
natural numbers !  rose3  Number Theory  1  January 13th, 2010 09:41 AM 
quations in natural numbers  damgam  Algebra  7  December 21st, 2008 04:24 AM 