My Math Forum An elementary proof of the Fermat’s Last Theorem

 Number Theory Number Theory Math Forum

 September 6th, 2015, 04:20 AM #1 Senior Member   Joined: Oct 2011 Posts: 135 Thanks: 1 An elementary proof of the Fermat’s Last Theorem Fermat's Last Theorem (main case: n is prime): For integers A, B, C and prime n>2 the equal $\displaystyle A^n+B^n=C^n$ does not exist. The essence of the contradiction: If Fermat’s equality $\displaystyle A^n+B^n=C^n$ exists then A+B-C=0 and $\displaystyle A^n+B^n0 and A is the base of a degree$\displaystyle A^n$, then the digit$\displaystyle (A^n)_{(t+2)}=x$; 0b°) if$\displaystyle a_{[t+1]}=xn^t+1$, where digit$\displaystyle a_{(t+1)}=x>0$и t>0, then the digit$\displaystyle [(a_{[t+1]})^{n-1}]_{(t+1)}=[-x]=n-x$. So, let us assume that for a prime number n>2, relatively prime A, B, C, and A'[or B']≠0 1°)$\displaystyle A^n=(C-B)P$[$\displaystyle =aP=C^n-B^n$, where$\displaystyle P=p^n$and /for convenience/ a=C-B] where, as known, 1a°) P'=p'=1 (a consequence of Fermat's little theorem), 1b°)$\displaystyle [U=] A+B-C=un^k$, where k [>0] – the number of zeroes after the digit u' (i.e.$\displaystyle U_{[k+1]}≠0$). 1c°) g – any integer solution [which exists!] of the equation$\displaystyle (Ag)_{[k+2]}=1$. An elementary proof of the Fermat’s Last Theorem Let's multiply the equation 1° by the number$\displaystyle g^n$from 1c° received the new equality 1°: 1°) A$\displaystyle ^n=(C-B)P$, where P$\displaystyle =Pg^{n-1}$, A$\displaystyle =Ag$, A$\displaystyle ^n=A^n*g^n$and A$\displaystyle _{[k+2]}=$A$\displaystyle ^n_{[k+2]}=1$; k and n are const. Let us show that the ending (C-B)$\displaystyle _{[k+2]} $, or a$\displaystyle _{[k+2]} $, is also equal to 1. To do this, the number P will be represented in the following form: P=q$\displaystyle ^{n-1}+$Q$\displaystyle n^{k+2}$[this is the KEY to the demonstration], where q and Q are integers. 2°) a'= q'=1, which is deduced from 1°b. 3°) From the identity A$\displaystyle ^n_{(2)}=[(a''n+1)(q''n+1)^{n-1}]_{(2)}= $(cf. 0b°)=$\displaystyle =[(a''n+1)(-q''n+1)]_{(2)} $[=0] we find: a''=q'' and the degree of endings A$\displaystyle ^n_{/2/}=[(a''n+1)_{[2]}]^n$, from here (cf. 0a°) we find the digit [A$\displaystyle ^n]_{(3)} $: 4°) [A$\displaystyle ^n]_{(3)} $(=0 – cf. 1°) = a'' and therefore a''=q''=0 (otherwise [A$\displaystyle ^n]_{(3)}≠0$). And then, we makes calculations 3°-4° with all subsequent digits [until the (k+1)-th] of the numbers A, P and a, with the result equality A$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=$P$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=$a$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=$(C-B)$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=1$and 5°) [A-(C-B)]$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=$[A+B-C]$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=$U$\displaystyle _{[k+1]}=0\$, which contradicts to 1b°. Thus FLT proved. Victor SOROKINE
September 6th, 2015, 04:24 AM   #2
Senior Member

Joined: Sep 2015
From: 4th Dimension

Posts: 146
Thanks: 13

Math Focus: Everything (a little bit)
Quite scary
Quote:

 September 7th, 2015, 05:28 AM #3 Senior Member   Joined: Apr 2014 From: Glasgow Posts: 2,068 Thanks: 692 Math Focus: Physics, mathematical modelling, numerical and computational solutions Could a moderator please move this to the number theory subforum? This is not high school algebra.
September 7th, 2015, 05:45 AM   #4
Math Team

Joined: Dec 2013
From: Colombia

Posts: 6,973
Thanks: 2295

Math Focus: Mainly analysis and algebra
Quote:
 Originally Posted by Yash Malik Quite scary
It's almost certainly nonsense. I wouldn't waste my time reading it.

 September 7th, 2015, 12:44 PM #5 Math Team     Joined: May 2013 From: The Astral plane Posts: 1,595 Thanks: 620 Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff. @victorsorokin I can't read it myself, but if you feel you have an actual proof why are you posting it here and not trying to get published?? -Dan
 September 7th, 2015, 05:01 PM #6 Senior Member   Joined: Dec 2013 Posts: 1,112 Thanks: 41 This guy is genius and he deserves the Fields medal! He is right! All the international mathematical community confirms his proof. Let him send it to some mathematical journal. He will surely be published. Do not debate with him. It will be loss of time. Do not waste your time. Just applaud loudly!
September 7th, 2015, 06:04 PM   #7
Senior Member

Joined: Apr 2015
From: Barto PA

Posts: 170
Thanks: 18

Quote:
 Originally Posted by mobel This guy is genius and he deserves the Fields medal! He is right! All the international mathematical community confirms his proof. Let him send it to some mathematical journal. He will surely be published. Do not debate with him. It will be loss of time. Do not waste your time. Just applaud loudly!
Somehow I detect just a slight note of facetiousness in your reply. Evidently
the OP has posted various editions of
his 'proof' on numerous sites for many
years using the last name 'Sorokine'.
His 'math' is well beyond my ability to
comprehend. Perhaps Professor Wiles
could have a look.

September 7th, 2015, 06:58 PM   #8
Math Team

Joined: May 2013
From: The Astral plane

Posts: 1,595
Thanks: 620

Math Focus: Wibbly wobbly timey-wimey stuff.
Quote:
 Originally Posted by uvkajed Somehow I detect just a slight note of facetiousness in your reply. Evidently the OP has posted various editions of his 'proof' on numerous sites for many years using the last name 'Sorokine'. His 'math' is well beyond my ability to comprehend. Perhaps Professor Wiles could have a look.
Professor Wiles is currently working on Fermat's Second to Last Theorem.

-Dan

September 8th, 2015, 09:54 PM   #9
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 135
Thanks: 1

Flt

Quote:
 Originally Posted by topsquark @victorsorokin I can't read it myself, but if you feel you have an actual proof why are you posting it here and not trying to get published?? -Dan
This topic is forbidden in all major forums.

September 8th, 2015, 10:04 PM   #10
Senior Member

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 135
Thanks: 1

Flt

Quote:
 Originally Posted by topsquark Professor Wiles is currently working on Fermat's Second to Last Theorem. -Dan
An elementary proof - this is a task for the crazy.

 Tags elementary, fermat's, fermat’s, proof, theorem

,

,

,

,

### barlow's equations fermat

Click on a term to search for related topics.
 Thread Tools Display Modes Linear Mode

 Similar Threads Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post talisman Real Analysis 0 November 1st, 2012 04:16 AM MrAwojobi Number Theory 17 September 2nd, 2011 11:04 AM george gill Calculus 5 May 14th, 2011 02:13 PM meteuzun Number Theory 3 February 10th, 2010 12:10 PM HairOnABiscuit Real Analysis 4 December 17th, 2009 11:37 AM

 Contact - Home - Forums - Cryptocurrency Forum - Top